Liberal Judge Just Ordered Parents To Do DISGUSTING Thing After Muslim Refugee Raped Their 5 Yr Old

Liberal Judge Just Ordered Parents To Do DISGUSTING Thing After Muslim Refugee Raped Their 5-Yr-Old Daughter

I hope you’re prepared to be angered by the most radicalized liberal bullsh*t you have ever read. This horrible story involves the worst case of liberalism you may have ever witnessed.

Long story short? A five-year-old girl was gang raped and peed on by three Muslims and they didn’t go to jail.

Short story long? Let’s get right into those horrible details that will hopefully have you rally behind the true victim, a 5-year-old girl, and call for the jail time of a horrible judge and terrible lawyer.

Her name is Jayla Peterson and she was raped orally and anally by three Muslim migrants. After raping her in horrible ways, the rapists then urinated on her body. Another Islamic influenced horrendous crime by the sick and sad uncivilized Muslim religion. Do we see a pattern yet with the Muslim migrants? They’re 99.9% worthless people who don’t know how to act when they migrate to another country. They’re generally horrible people who think this is the land of barbaric treatment towards others. I don’t care what culture or religion you’re from, the rape of a five-year-old can’t be justified by anyone. Well, except Muslims. They clearly think this is acceptable behavior. Maybe it’s in their sh*tty Sharia law. What page of their lawbook says it is acceptable to rape and urinate on kids?

five-year-old Jayla Peterson… was orally and anally raped and then urinated upon by three Muslim migrant boys, two from Iraq one from Sudan, in the town of Twin Falls, Idaho as one of the boys videoed the attack.

As if the rape and urination weren’t bad enough, these losers made a video of the attack. I wonder how many “likes” they got from their culture for this.

The rape and urination on a five-year-old story gets worse. That was the disgusting start of a story with a hideous outcome that is NOT the gold standard of American justice, but instead, the liberals obsession with Islam, proving why no liberal should ever hold a position in court or law.
Of all the quotes and sayings from America’s founding, there’s one known to almost all of our citizens, it ends with “and justice for all.” Images of a blindfolded lady liberty holding the scales of justice (supposedly) symbolize the fact that the American judicial system does not see age, color or creed. The judge in this tragic case seems to have tossed all that, with a shocking decision on the guilt of the attackers and then a gag order for everyone involved. There’s a politically correct cover-up going on, and it’s despicable.

Tossed all of that puts it lightly. It’s more like the liberals put American values and the safety of a five-year-old on one of those medieval cannon ball launchers and shot it into the horizon with hopes to not ever see it again. This liberal piece of trash said “bye Felicia” to protecting American citizens and getting first on the list to show love for a lousy religion and their criminals.

Pamela Gellar from Jihad Watch wrote the following account of the courtroom drama:

“Judge Thomas Borreson of Idaho’s 5th Judicial District ordered the little victim’s parents, Lacy and Levi Peterson, to say nothing to anyone – ever – about what was said in the courtroom Tuesday, or to disclose the sentence that he gave to the savage attackers. He did allow them to say that they were unhappy with the sentencing, but threatened to jail them for contempt of court if they disclosed why they were unhappy with it.

Judge Thomas Borrenson deserves to lose his job and spend life in prison with Muslim rapists. How dare he threaten a family whose child was already tortured? How dare he tell a family how to react or what to say/not say about the case where their precious and innocent child was treated like a sexualized goat in Afghanistan? Is this someone who deserves to be a judge? Absolutely not. Judge Thomas Borrenson is unfit to serve the American public and unfit to make intelligent decisions that put criminals where they belong. These three rapists deserve at least 20 years in the slammer. AT LEAST! Judge Thomas Borrenson deserves to spend 20 years with them.

Janice Kroeger, the Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, who was supposed to be trying these boys for their crimes, defended the boys and repeatedly attacked Lacy, the victim’s mother. A therapist for the boys was present, as well as a parole officer and a detective. Everything that was said was designed to portray the perpetrators as victims. Throughout the proceedings, they were repeatedly called victims, and the youngest one was called “the biggest victim of them all.”

JUST IN: 12 Dem Staffers Charged With Voter Fraud In Shock State

JUST IN: 12 Dem Staffers Charged With Voter Fraud In Shock State

Twelve employees in Indiana, working for the Democrat-backed group Patriot Majority USA, have been charged with submitting fraudulent voter registration applications in the lead-up to the 2016 election. (via The Daily Caller)

Patriot Majority USA is dedicated to mobilizing and registering black voters, and has strong ties to former President Bill Clinton, and the former Democrat Senate Minority Leader, Harry Reid.

However, despite the Democrat connections, Patriot Majority USA is a registered nonprofit that is not permitted to promote any particular candidate, or partisan cause.

Eleven temporary canvassers and their supervisor, Holiday Burke, have been charged with submitting fraudulent voter registrations. Each charge carries a maximum sentence of two and a half years in prison.

Authorities became aware of the fraudulent activity after a clerk discovered over a dozen registration forms with inaccurate, and suspicious, information.

The canvassers were registering voters who did not exist, residents who had already registered to vote, and even some minors. All sorts of people were illegally registered.
Patriot Majority USA describes themselves as a grassroots organization, however, the vast majority of the group’s funding is provided by a few anonymous donors.

In 2013, twelve anonymous donors contributed over $1 million each. An additional donor single-handedly gave $6 million to the supposedly community-driven project. The organization also has close ties to labor unions, which contributed over $3 million in 2013. The spending was likely higher during the 2016 election.

Despite the Democrat party’s efforts to fraudulently enlarge their voter pool, Hillary Clinton was still easily defeated by President Trump. President Trump beat Clinton by almost 20 points, receiving over 500,000 more critical votes than his opponent.

Hillary Clinton was so unlikable, and her policy solutions were so obviously disastrous, that the Democrat candidate could not even muster up a win while cheating.

The classic Democrat talking point, that voter fraud does not exist, is starting to look suspicious as they continue to get caught rigging elections.

Do you think Hillary Clinton attempted to steal the 2016 election and failed? Please share the story on Facebook and tell us what you think because we want to hear YOUR voice!

Trump’s Lawyer Just Went on Live TV and Revealed James Comey’s Worst Nightmare

Trump’s Lawyer Just Went on Live TV and Revealed James Comey’s Worst Nightmare

President Trump’s lawyer, Jay Sekulow responded on Live TV about allegations made under oath by former FBI director Comey.

I have no idea what the context of that call was or was going to be. And I can’t speculate on that. But I would say at the outset, George, and you raised this, the issue of the leak from James Comey to his friend at Columbia Law School, that was ultimately leaked to The New York Times, is unprecedented.

I mean, I want everyone to be thinking about this. The current — then current FBI director took contemporaneous notes, put them on a form, used government facilities to do that. If an FBI agent does that, they usually fill out a form 302.

Could you imagine what would happen if an FBI agent then leaked that form 302 out to The New York Times, what the allegations would be? So this was an unprecedented move. And Preet mentioned the issue of executive privilege. The president and the administration wasn’t — they did not invoke executive privilege on this hearing, but on these documents they didn’t know what the contents were.
The president said he is going to address the issue of the tapes, whether the tapes exist or not, next week. That’s a decision that the president will make in consultation with his chief lawyer Marc Kasowitz, and that the president said he’ll address it next week.

But here’s the one thing that’s clear, right now what do you have? A leaked memo that was leaked to The Washington Post, allegedly because he read in The New York Times or he read the tweet, but yet, you know, what’s also interesting is, much of the content of what appeared to be in that memorandum was actually in The New York Times the day before.

And then James Comey made this statement, which I find also troubling. He said he issued the release or the disclosure, or I would say, leak of the information through his friend, not even directly, through his friend in order to draw a special counsel. And the next day he got one.

BREAKING: Chelsea Attacks GOP, Accidentally Humiliates Michelle Obama Instead

BREAKING: Chelsea Attacks GOP, Accidentally Humiliates Michelle Obama Instead

According to Dennis Michael Lynch, sleuth extraordinaire, Chelsea took to Twitter to express her outrage over REPUBLICANS forcing schoolchildren to go hungry. Clinton stated that “research” confirms kids do better when they aren’t hungry, but soon realized her mistake — Michelle Obama’s program JUST got scrapped because kids were going hungry!

Oh, sweet irony. When Michelle Obama got involved in our nation’s school lunch system, she decided that EVERYTHING on the menu should be “healthy” and top-notch. The only problem with her master plan was this: children were refusing to eat the array of disgusting foods put on their plates. Please, enlighten us — what 8-year-old likes eating bean sprouts?
The original tweet Chelsea posted implied that “research showed” that children who aren’t hungry pay more attention in class than hungry ones. We don’t think the research was necessary for this study. Obviously, if you’re hungry, then learning and retaining information is going to be a challenge. We sure are glad that Chelsea was on the case.

Twitter users started calling her out almost immediately. Somehow, she thought it would be a good idea to blame Republicans in a secondary tweet! It’s hilarious, yet sad, that she’s this dense.

If everyone recalls, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue announced a full rollback on Michelle’s plan. Perdue gave a specific reason why this had to happen immediately.

“This announcement is the result of years of feedback from students, schools, and food service experts about the challenges they are facing in meeting the final regulations for school meals.” Perdue continued, “If kids aren’t eating the food, and it is ending up in the trash, they aren’t getting any nutrition — thus undermining the intent of the program.”

Just think, Chelsea, a couple of minutes of research would have saved you from this embarrassment. You inadvertently called out Michelle Obama while blaming Republicans. The beautiful thing about the internet? It NEVER forgets.

Some of the responses Clinton got to her tweets were amazing. There was a systematic breakdown of why she was wrong, and there were facts to support the claim — something that confuses the Left. You cannot just go online and make a bold claim like that with no facts to support what you’re saying! Plain and simple — well, unless you’re willing to look like a fool.

Chelsea seemed to want to respond to the people supporting her, but had nothing to say to the people with those pesky facts. Maybe liberals will never learn to think about what they’re saying. If not, at least we have plenty of great laughs coming up from these fools. They honestly believe they’re doing a great service for the world.

What do you think about this comment below.

Hosts Of ‘The View’ Launch VILE Attack On Barron Trump – They Aren’t Laughing Now…

Hosts Of ‘The View’ Launch VILE Attack On Barron Trump – They Aren’t Laughing Now…

Several weeks ago, 11 year-old Barron Trump was traumatized when he saw Kathy Griffin in a photoshoot, holding a severed, bloody head in the likeness of the president. Barron was reportedly upset thinking the images were real.

The experience was very difficult for the young child, which is why it was truly despicable when the women of The View mocked Barron for it on an episode of their ABC talk show.

Former The View host Star Jones got the ball rolling when she guest-hosted the program last week.

“Our president though cracks me up when he says his son was upset,” Jones said, according to Breitbart. “He has to remember — I wonder how upset he was when he heard his father referred to the kinds of assaults that he would do on women or did they not talk about that?”

“Or making fun of handicapped people,” interjected Joy Behar.

“Yes exactly,” said Jones.

“Or make fun of a Gold Star family. I mean he was horrible,” Behar said of Trump.

“There is a lot to have been embarrassed about if that was your father,” Jones concluded.
Hosts Of ‘The View’ Launch VILE Attack On Barron Trump – They Aren’t Laughing Now…
WRITTEN BY ADAM LOTT (1 DAY AGO)
Share This StorySHARE THIS STORY
Several weeks ago, 11 year-old Barron Trump was traumatized when he saw Kathy Griffin in a photoshoot, holding a severed, bloody head in the likeness of the president. Barron was reportedly upset thinking the images were real. The experience was very difficult for the young child, which is why it was truly despicable when the women of The View mocked Barron for it on an episode of their ABC talk show.
Former The View host Star Jones got the ball rolling when she guest-hosted the program last week.
“Our president though cracks me up when he says his son was upset,” Jones said, according to Breitbart. “He has to remember — I wonder how upset he was when he heard his father referred to the kinds of assaults that he would do on women or did they not talk about that?”
“Or making fun of handicapped people,” interjected Joy Behar.
“Yes exactly,” said Jones.
“Or make fun of a Gold Star family. I mean he was horrible,” Behar said of Trump.
“There is a lot to have been embarrassed about if that was your father,” Jones concluded.

Since their despicable comments, thousands of patriots are calling for The View to be permanently cancelled. There’s already a petition on Change.org called Cancel ABC’s The View that has thousands of signatures. Plus people are also taking to social media to express their outrage and disgust.

Will the ladies on The View apologize for their remarks? Will the show eventually be cancelled due to their inappropriate statements and incessant anti-Trump propaganda? Only time will tell, but in the meantime, thousands of patriots are letting these horrible, spiteful zealots know exactly how they feel.

It’s truly telling of these women that they are incapable of being sensitive to the reaction of an 11 year-old upon seeing such a disturbing image of his father! SHARE this story if you agree The View should be CANCELLED!