Day: April 24, 2018

WATCH What Macron Does When Trump Slaps Liberal Reporter For “Asking Stupid” Question

Source: https://goo.gl/hvVBM1
And once again the left wing mainstream media in this country has to prove how biased they really are against the right and our President, Donald J. Trump.

This time during a sit-down between President Trump and French President Macron, ABC News’ Jonathan Karl was once again up to his usual tricks. He actually yelled out a question which had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the issue at hand.

Karl asked “Mr. President, what about Michael Cohen? Are you considering a pardon?”

To which the President replied “Thank you very much. Stupid question,” right before he moved on to another reporter.

Trending: Kellyanne Brutally Slams Michelle Obama And Now She’s Being Called A Racist For It

But what’s really great about this whole exchange between Karl and Trump is the smile on Macron’s face when he heard the President’s response. It was priceless.
And of course, the leftist journalist Karl is not happy about the exchange.

Now, this would all be ok. No issue with asking a question like this, although when our president is with the head of another nation it’s disrespectful. You can just tell Macron was very happy to see that response and would probably love to say something like that to his own press.

This is how the mainstream media would treat Barack Hussein Obama:
Can you all see the huge smile on that reporter’s face as she slobbered all over President Obama? It’s like she is a pre-teen girl meeting her newest pop music boy band sensation. These people in the media protected and carried water for President Obama for 8 years, and they still continue to protect him to this day.

The press is supposed to be objective unless otherwise stated like in the case of Sean Hannity and Mark Levin. And that is fine, but the issue is that these people in the mainstream media pose as being objective just to forward their own agenda, and that’s not right.

Here is more on the Cohen saga via The Daily News:

“WASHINGTON- Attorney General Jeff Sessions has decided against recusing himself from the investigation into President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, but will consider stepping back from specific questions tied to the probe, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Sessions recused himself from the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election that’s now led by special counsel Robert Mueller, a decision that angered Trump and left Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in charge of the inquiry. Sessions, who was a top adviser to Trump’s presidential campaign, announced in March 2017 that he had decided he should steer clear of “any matters arising from the campaigns” for president.

Trump has called Sessions weak for doing so and said he never would have named him as attorney general had he known the recusal would follow.

By staying involved in the Cohen probe, Sessions is entitled to briefings on the status of the investigation, which is being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Southern District of New York. That could put Sessions in the position of being asked by Trump, who strongly condemned the FBI raid on his longtime lawyer, to divulge information about the Cohen investigation.

Sessions could also weigh in on specific decisions by prosecutors, including whether to pursue subpoenas and indictments.

The attorney general may be asked about his role in the Cohen investigation when he testifies before congressional panels on Wednesday and Thursday. The investigation into Cohen’s finances and past work was opened based in part on a referral from Mueller.

The Justice Department declined to comment specifically about decisions on recusal in the Cohen investigation, saying only that Sessions follows appropriate procedures.

“The attorney general considers his potential recusal on a matter-by-matter basis as may be needed,” the department said in a statement. “To the extent a matter comes to the attention of his office that may warrant consideration of recusal, the attorney general would review the issue and consult with the appropriate Department ethics experts.”

But Geoffrey Berman, the acting U.S. attorney in the Southern District, has recused himself from the Cohen probe, according to a U.S. official. It’s unclear what triggered his recusal.

Rosenstein, as the No. 2 official at the Justice Department, is responsible for coordinating and resolving any conflicts between the Mueller probe and the Cohen investigation. In a sign of how senior Justice Department officials can become involved in investigative matters, Rosenstein approved an FBI raid earlier this month on Cohen’s home, office and hotel room that seized a trove of information.

Trump denounced the raid as “an attack on what we all stand for” and repeated that it was a “terrible mistake” for Sessions to recuse himself from the Mueller prob

Nunes Just Announced New FBI Evidence That Will End The Trump Investigation

Source: https://goo.gl/fCLbm3
The question begs to be asked why the left continues to use the tired narrative of Russian collusion for their epic 2016 presidential loss over and over again despite being disproven over and over again and despite nearly two years of being unable to find even one shred of evidence to support this tired narrative nearly two years after the fact. Why continue with this farce? After all, Russians and Democrats share the same economic ideas of socialism, and both use terms like “worker’s rights” and “equality” as a smokescreen to confiscate or redistribute the wealth of few to many, themselves.

Many of these people still cannot accept the fact that the American people did not want Hillary Clinton in the first place, nor have they ever and they simply keep latching onto the same tired narrative in the hopes they will eventually uncover something they can use to impeach President Donald Trump.

Still, this long-winded, expensive, frivolous investigation begs an important question – How pray tell did these people ever even get the idea Russia meddled in our election in the first place? It is a very important question that too few people have been asking. Yet one Congressman has been asking and his findings could stop this witchhunt in its tracks.

According to Fox Business –

Trending: Kellyanne Brutally Slams Michelle Obama And Now She’s Being Called A Racist For It

“House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said Sunday his review of FBI and Justice Department ‘electronic communication’ documents shows no intelligence was used to begin the investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election.
‘We now know that there was no official intelligence that was used to start this investigation. We know that Sidney Blumenthal and others were pushing information into the State Department. So we’re trying to piece all that together and that’s why we continue to look at the State Department,’ Nunes told Maria Bartiromo on ‘Sunday Morning Futures.’

Nunes, R-Calif., cited the Five Eyes agreement as a way of knowing no intel was used. The U.S., along with Canada, the U.K., Australia and New Zealand, make up the ‘Five Eyes,’ or countries that share intelligence in a more-trusted fashion than other arrangements, like NATO, particularly due to years of trust and a common language.

‘We are not supposed to spy on each other’s citizens, and it’s worked well,’ he said. ‘And it continues to work well. And we know it’s working well because there was no intelligence that passed through the Five Eyes channels to our government. And that’s why we had to see that original communication.’

The California Republican said he is now investigating the State Department due to signs of ‘major irregularities,’ in an effort to figure out how information about former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos – who reportedly met with a foreign policy expert and Cambridge professor with connections to the CIA and Britain’s MI6 in London in 2016 – was obtained by the FBI.

‘We know a little bit about that because of what some of the State Department officials themselves have said about that,’ Nunes said, adding that ‘We have to make sure that our agencies talk and they work out problems. We have to make sure that they don’t spy on either American citizens or that we’re not spying on British citizens.”

Still, Nunes doesn’t know whether the former secretary of state and then-Democratic challenger to Trump in the election, Hillary Clinton, was pulling the strings of the investigation launched against her political opponent. However, he said it is known that two long-time Clinton associates – including Sidney Blumenthal – were ‘actively’ giving information to the State Department, which ‘was somehow making its way to the FBI.’
Due to this mounting pile of evidence proving President Trump is innocent of any sort of Russian collusion? When is Attorney General Jeff Sessions going to indict Hillary and those around her for their crimes? Former FBI Director James Comey, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Acting Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe, FBI Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Counsel Lisa Page, are among the names on the list of people who are accused of abusing our legal system for political purposes? Rep. DeSantis recently sent a letter to Sessions cosigned by ten colleagues calling for an investigation into several Obama-era officials for potential violations of federal statutes.

Adam Schiff, a California Democrat and ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, responded to Nunes’ comments on Sunday, calling the information regarding Papadopoulos which led to the initiation of the investigation “well-founded.”

Hillary Clinton Fantasizes About Her ‘Instrumental’ Role in Irish Peace Process… Again

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/Cpc7gS
Source: https://goo.gl/nJXyvW
There she goes again.

That Walter Mitty would-be-world-famous-diplomat who saved the island of Ireland and brought the peace that had eluded its leaders and negotiators for three centuries has come back.

Who are we talking about?

Well, that would be Hillary Clinton, Savior of the Celtic Isle.
It’s hard to believe, but Clinton is once again replaying her make-believe claim that she played an important role in the Irish peace process.

Don’t believe her. It wasn’t true when she made it up years ago and it’s still not true. She didn’t play any role. None at all.

By all accounts, (except her own) Hillary was a by-stander who accompanied her husband to Ireland — as any first lady would. But unlike her predecessors, Hillary had fanciful delusions about her own relevance and importance in the historical Irish peace process.

Her easily exposed fibs and exaggerations have been well documented.

The particular lines of lies about Ireland started during her 2008 presidential campaign when Clinton told National Public Radio that she played an “instrumental” role in ending the century’s old “Troubles” between the Irish Catholics and Protestants in order to shore up her involvement in something — anything — outside of domestic policy.

We exposed her growing embellishments in several columns in 2007 and 2008 and showed that it was only Bill and Hillary who believed that she had anything to do with the peace process — and they didn’t recall it when they wrote their multi-million dollar memoirs.

Even the Obama campaign vehemently denied that she had any role whatsoever. After that, she laid low for a while.

But now she’s on the loose again. In an interview at the all-women’s club, The Wing, on April 3, Hillary gratuitously threw in this line:

“I was involved in the Irish peace process and the Good Friday Accord.”

It was a throw-away line. They weren’t discussing Ireland in any way, shape, or form.

What the heck would make her go down that road again?

Just being Hillary! Remember how she landed under sniper fire in Bosnia? Except the imaginary snipers turned out to be innocent little girls handing her bouquets of flowers.

She’d been thoroughly and publicly humiliated by those dedicated public servants who actually did play a role in Ireland. David Trimble, the head of the Northern Ireland delegation who ceaselessly negotiated for peace and shared the Ulster Nobel Peace Prize for the success of the Good Friday Accord, called Hillary’s claim “a wee bit silly.” He said, “I don’t want to rain on the thing for her, but being a cheerleader for something is slightly different from being a principal player.”

Former U.S. George Mitchell, who spent years working for the peace, barely mentioned her in his book, “Making Peace,” saying only that she “encouraged women in Northern Ireland to get involved.” He also confirmed that she wasn’t “directly involved” in the process at all.

And Mitchell never referred to her in his speech at the U.N. when he received the U.N. Peace Prize.

Former IRA leader Gerry Adams, who was publicly legitimized and rehabilitated by Bill Clinton, politely recalled that “I met the senator on many occasions when she was first lady, and subsequently when she became a senator for New York State. I always found her to be extremely well informed on the issues.”

So meeting Gerry Adams and knowing the issues makes one influential in the peace process?

But throughout her campaign for the presidency in 2008, Hillary and Bill Clinton boldly rewrote history, claiming that her success in bringing peace to Ireland was all part of the vast experience that made her qualified for the White House.

BREAKING News Out Of Philadelphia… Here’s What We Know

Source: https://goo.gl/yUUP1L
In the wake of an increased call for firearm safety and further regulation, the Philadelphia Police Department has announced that their first gun buyback event of the year in North Philly.
Partnering with Yoni Nadav, owner of Official Unlimited (Broad & York streets) PPD’s 22nd District is offering total immunity to anyone who turns in a weapon, as well as a $75 credit to Mr. Nadav’s store. Gift cards are in limited supply and will be given out on a first-come-first-serve basis, Philly News reports.
Handguns, shotguns and rifles can be exchanged for $100 Ralph’s gift cards, and assault weapons can be swapped for $200 gift cards at two LAPD gun buyback events Saturday. LA Times
With more cities and states joining this movement, this mind-set to turn in your firearms and get money or gift cards, a new program has been launched that targets AR style firearms, the AR Buy Back.
On Tough Issues, Incentives Can Lead to Action
The AR Buyback program is designed to be as simple as possible for families and young people who, like us, feel communities would be safer with fewer assault rifles in the hands of teens and young adults.

If a young person with an assault rifle decides he or she is willing to give up that weapon, we have set up a simple process that pays them fair market value for their weapon(s), as an incentive to change.

The Assault Rifle Buyback Fund is a Doing Business As (DBA) designation of Grant Partners Inc. (GPI)
GPI was established as a Florida not-for-profit corporation in 2009 and granted 501(c)(3) (not-for-profit) status by the Internal Revenue Service in 2011. Our mission is to work with other charities and not-for-profit entities to accomplish charitable and educational purposes, and to assist with the startup needs of new charities and not-for-profits.

We are not affiliated with or funded by any political parties or partisan groups.

To verify our tax-deductible status with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as a 501(c)(3) designated organization, please use the following site and enter our EIN #, which is 27-1285567:

https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/pub78Search.do?searchChoice=pub78&dispatchMethod=selectSearch

For questions or to request additional information, please Contact Us.
They claim they are not affiliated or funded by any “political Parties” yet by their own words, they are clearly affiliated with March For Our Lives:

ARbuyback
If you were inspired by the March For Our Lives this weekend, please consider donating at ARbuyback.org. Your donations will fund the buyback of assault rifles from families who want to voluntarily turn them in.

At the March For Our Lives, we had a chance to speak to people who understood that if we want meaningful, lasting change we need to start now. The Assault Rifle Buyback Fund is here to give families and people wanting to support families a way to start now. Join us!

We’re at the March for Our Lives doing our part to make a difference for families who are ready to change. We’ve spoken to many families today that are ready for something to happen. Help us help them!
Assault weapon is a made up term. Put a extended mag in a hunting rifle and there’d be no difference. So the next take away would be semi-auto rifles, then handguns.
AR does not stand for assault rifle, it stands for Armalite Rifle the company that created the first AR. he verb Assault describes an action, I was assaulted, he is assaulting someone, she used a gun to assault him. Assault is the action taken. Johnny used a knife to assault Jimmy, this does not make the knife an assault knife. Johnny used a big knife, a blue knife, etc… Big, blue are adjectives, they describe the knife, assault cannot describe something because it is an action word, a verb. The anti-gun movement used the verb “assault” simply to scare people, to make people perceive the weapon (gun) as its own entity capable of action in its own right, making it appear almost alive; therefore an “assault weapon” appears as though it could almost act on its own, that is a scary thought indeed, but it can’t. Words do matter, and using them correctly matters even more when it comes to protecting the Rights of an individual. There is no “assault” weapon, only weapons used in the act of assaulting someone, in the act of an assault. When my grandmother was punishing me she wasn’t using an assault spoon, she was using a wooden one, think about it.
.”