Day: April 24, 2018

It’s Fun to Watch The Liberals’ and Never Trumpers’ Coup Dreams Die

Source: https://goo.gl/cbXtaw
Face it: Hillary Clinton will never be Playmate of the Year. We know this because apparently only a former Playmate of the Year can finally be the one to take down Donald Trump and The Smartest Woman Ever™ was demonstrably unable to make that happen. This latest deus ex mockable solution to the problem of America electing a guy the elite disapproves of, convincing America to somehow turn on its President because a decade ago he engaged in in real life what hordes of creepy shut-ins engaged in in their own minds, is simply hilarious.

Trump hooked up with a Playboy Playmate! That’s the last straw!

Yeah, he’s done for now, according to noted Democrat political strategist Chet the Unicorn.

Whatever. The only danger Hottiegate poses to The Donald is carpal tunnel syndrome from thousands of high fives.
So, whatever the lucky Playboy Playmate’s name is joins Stormy Daniels, Pocahontas, not being nice enough to John McCain, telling the truth about illegal aliens, saying “schlonged,” having Russian dressing on his salad, and a thousand other forgotten “WE HAVE YOU NOW!” news cycle topics, on the endless list of WORST THINGS EVER! that were supposed to finally purge the scourge that is Donald Trump.

You liberals and your Fredocon lackeys need to get this through your heads. You are not purging this guy. He’s purging you. Just look at James Comey, who has gone from Tower of Integrity to Looming Doofus. The winding trail from the bottom of that famous escalator to right here and now is littered with the twitching bodies of those who thought they could take on The Donald and win.

And it’s a delight to watch you hacks go nuts about it.

Warning: When Trump denuclearizes North Korea and gets a peace treaty signed, everybody put on ponchos because the haters’ heads are going to explode. In the words of the late, great Marine R. Lee Ermey, it’s going to look like a “modern art masterpiece.”

Contrast that with the situation faced by Andrew McCabe, who now lives under a bus where his former pal Shady James Comey threw him. He’s going to get prosecuted and there’s no pardon for him at the end of that rainbow. See, the thing is he knows he’s hanging out there alone. He knows that no one will help him. And he knows he’s actually guilty of something. All that makes for a very chatty Andy.

He’s an ex-cop and a pretty one at that, so prison’s not going to be much fun. If anyone will spill the beans – and McCabe knows where all the beans are planted – then the smart money is on him. Just think of the agony on the MSNBC panels when McCabe starts talking about the conspiracy to exonerate Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit and the plot to frame the President. He’s got nothing to lose, and flipping on his Deep State crew is now his only way out.

Pity the poor liberals and their cruise-shilling Never Trump minions. It’s going to be hilarious when their scheme to bring down the President brings them down instead.

Dershowitz Just Laid the LEGAL SMACKDOWN on Robert Mueller

Source: https://goo.gl/xjZogt
Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz is the latest, in a growing number of people, who are calling for an investigation into Robert Mueller.

Dershowitz argues that people are so focused on “destroying” President Trump that they’re trampling all over his civil liberties.
By Alan Dershowitz

Just as the first casualty of war is truth, so, too, the first casualty of hyperpartisan politics is civil liberties.
Many traditional civil libertarians have allowed their strong anti-Trump sentiments to erase their long-standing commitment to neutral civil liberties. They are now so desperate to get President Trump that they are prepared to compromise the most basic due process rights. They forget the lesson of history that such compromises made against one’s enemy are often used as precedents against one’s friends. As Robert Bolt put it in the play and movie “A Man for all Seasons”:

Roper: So now you would give the Devil benefit of Law!

Thomas More: Yes, what would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

Roper: I’d cut down every law in England to do that!

Thomas More: And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country’s planted thick with laws from coast to coast — man’s laws, not God’s — and if you cut them down — and you’re just the man to do it — d’you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake.

But today’s fair weather civil libertarians are unwilling to give Trump — who they regard as the devil — the “benefit of law” and civil liberties.

Consider the issue of criticizing Robert Mueller, the special counsel. Any criticism or even skepticism regarding Mueller’s history is seen as motivated by a desire to help Trump. Mueller was an assistant U.S. attorney in Boston, the head of its criminal division, the head of the criminal division in Main Justice, and the director of the FBI during the most scandalous miscarriage of justice in the modern history of the FBI. Four innocent people were framed by the FBI to protect mass murdering gangsters who were working as FBI informers while they were killing innocent people. An FBI agent, who is now in prison, was tipping off Whitey Bulger as to who might testify against him so that these individuals could be killed. He also tipped off Bulger, allowing him to escape and remain on the lam for 16 years.
What responsibility, if any, did Mueller, who was in key positions of authority and capable of preventing these horrible miscarriages, have in this sordid incident? A former member of the parole board — a liberal Democrat who also served as mayor of Springfield, Mass. — swears he saw a letter from Mueller urging the denial of release for at least one of these wrongfully convicted defendants. When he went back to retrieve the letter, it was not in the file. This should surprise no one since Judge Mark Wolf (himself a former prosecutor), who conducted extensive hearings about this entire mess, made the following findings:

The files relating to the Wheeler murder, and the FBI’s handling of them, exemplify recurring irregularities with regard to the preparation, maintenance, and production in this case of documents damaging to Flemmi and Bulger. First, there appears to be a pattern of false statements placed in Flemmi’s informant file to divert attention from his possible crimes and/or FBI misconduct….
Second, contrary to the FBI’s usual policy and practice, all but one of the reports containing Halloran’s allegations against Bulger and Flemmi were not indexed and placed in an investigative file referencing their names. Thus, those documents were not discoverable by a standard search of the FBI’s indices. Similar irregularities in indexing and, therefore, access occurred with regard to information that the FBI received concerning an extortion by Bulger of Hobart Willis and from Joseph Murray concerning the murder of Brian Halloran, among other things.
Third, when documents damaging to the FBI were found by the Bureau, they were in some instances not produced to the defendants or the court at the time required by the court’s Orders.
Wolf also made a finding that directly references Mueller’s state of knowledge regarding the “history”:

BREAKING Oregon Is FIGHTING BACK! HOLY HELL!!!

Source: https://goo.gl/B1Qqhz
“I’ve been told so many times by people in favor of gun control: ‘No one is coming to take your guns.’ This explicitly comes for your guns.” ~ Oregon Rep. Bill Post, R-Keizer

Chris “Badger” Thomas RIGHT WING TRIBUNE–

Some residents of an Oregon county are asking voters to support a proposed ballot measure that would bar local officials from enforcing any gun control law and uphold gun rights outlined in the Constitution.

The proposed Second Amendment Preservation Ordinance was filed with the Deschutes County clerk last week. It would empower the county sheriff to review federal, state and local laws and determine whether they violate the U.S. or Oregon constitutions, ABC News reports.

Oregon politicians have submitted a bill that would ban all “Assault Weapons and large capacity magazines”.

Deschutes County Sheriff Shane Nelson publicly opposed the proposal this month, saying Oregon already has laws on background checks and age restrictions. He noted that among those prohibited from buying a gun are convicted felons, those convicted of misdemeanor crimes involving violence, and those found to be mentally ill.

“I support and defend the Second Amendment and oppose IP 43,” Facebook Page “Oregon Sheriffs upholding the 2nd.”

Filed by an interfaith religious group in Portland, Initiative Petition 43 would also require legal gun owners to surrender or register their assault weapons or face felony charges, according to language released Tuesday.

The group said it aims to get enough signatures to put the measure before voters in the November general election.

They’ll need 1,000 signatures to begin the ballot title drafting process and 88,000 signatures by July 6 to get the measure on the ballot, according to the Oregon Secretary of State website. The initiative could also face court challenges.

“We recognize that there are perfectly legitimate uses of guns for self-protection and hunting that make a lot of sense,” said Rabbi Michael Z. Cahana of Congregation Beth Israel and one of petitioners.

“But assault weapons are not used for either of those purposes. Many of these weapons exist only for killing and do not belong in civilian hands.” ~ Statesman Journal

Gun advocates denounced the proposal, saying it represents an unprecedented attack on the public’s constitutional right to bear arms and would outlaw numerous styles of guns.

Even more controversial is the requirement that legal gun owners would need to give up or register their current guns with authorities. Which is against the 2nd Amendment.

The initiative would require any person in possession of an assault weapon to sell, surrender or remove the weapon from the state, or render it inoperable, within 120 days of passage.

A person that wanted to keep their assault weapon would need to register it with the Oregon State Police. OSP would look at a person’s criminal record — and other information — to determine whether they are “disqualified from possessing the weapon.”

“People who legally own assault rifles or large-capacity magazines will not be required to surrender their firearms, but will be required to register their firearms with the state,” said Penny Okamoto, executive director of Ceasefire Oregon, which is supporting the petition.

Any violation would be a Class B felony.
There is no such thing as an, “Assault Weapon” and these ignorant fools who keep spouting the propaganda to scare the sheep into submission, need to be fought on every level. RWT News

Chris “Badger” Thomas is a Veteran who served our country as an Army Combat Medic.

What Trump Just Did For Macron During Presser Proves Their Friendship is REAL

Source: https://goo.gl/6JJGL6
Never let it be said that President Trump is not a kind and thoughtful gentleman.

He proves that he is, every single day.
And the press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron was not an exception.

President Trump took a moment to brush off a bot of dandruff from Macron’s shoulder, explaining he wanted his friend and French President to look “perfect.”
President Trump paused during comments to reporters alongside French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday to brush a speck of dandruff off his counterpart’s shoulder, remarking that Macron needed to look “perfect.”

The smiling Macron said nothing as Trump told members of the media that reports about the United States’ “special” relationship with France was not “fake news,” then turned to him and removed an unseen particle from Macron’s suit.

“They’re all saying what a great relationship we have, and they’re actually correct. It’s not fake news. Finally, it’s not fake news. It’s a great honor, a great honor that you’re here, in fact I’ll get that little piece of dandruff, that little piece,” Trump said, laughing.

“We have to make him perfect. He is perfect. So it’s really great to be with you, and you are a special friend. Thank you,” Trump said, shaking Macron’s hand.

Macron is in Washington this week for an official state dinner at the White House, his first since Trump’s inauguration last year. The two will also have a one-on-one meeting in the Oval Office to discuss global policy.

“The wonderful friendship we have developed over the last year is a testament to the enduring friendship that binds our two nations,” Trump said Tuesday during a formal arrival ceremony on the South Lawn.

The two leaders have a history of awkward physical contact, famously sharing an aggressive handshake ahead of a NATO summit in Brussels last year.
Macron went on to tell reporters that the gesture from Trump “wasn’t innocent,” but declined to criticize Trump further.

“One must show that you won’t make small concessions, even symbolic ones, but also not over-publicize things, either,” he told Le Journal du Dimanche in May.

Liberals Freak As Rand Paul Helps Trump Move Pompeo To State Department For 1 Epic Reason

Source: https://goo.gl/9qXLe8
Liberals are freaking out after Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) just helped President Donald Trump move CIA Director Mike Pompeo over to be the new Secretary of State. You won’t want to miss the epic reason Paul decided to help, which he dropped on the liberal hacks over at MSNBC.

According to Daily Caller, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) said he had reconsidered his vote on Mike Pompeo for Secretary of State after extensive talks with President Donald Trump and Pompeo over the weekend. During an interview with MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” host Mika Brzezinski on Tuesday, April 24, 2018, Paul laid out exactly why he changed his mind on Pompeo’s passage through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Monday’s vote.

Without a doubt, no one over at MSNBC was rooting for Pompeo to become our next Secretary of State. So, it wasn’t a surprise when Brzezinski started out by trying to put Paul in the hot seat for changing his mind at the last minute by asking him what kind of promises Trump and Pompeo made Paul in order to secure his vote. “Senator, what were those assurances that came at the final moments that you didn’t hear before?” Brzezinski asked.
“You know, you’ve heard me before say that we’ve been at war too long and in too many places. I still believe that. I believe that very strongly. In fact, I think that’s one of my number one jobs up here is to try to see if we can end some of our military involvement around the globe,” Paul replied.

“And so, in saying that, that was one of the reasons I was worried about Director Pompeo because when I’ve asked him repeatedly was the Iraq war a mistake — President Trump has said it’s a mistake, do you say it’s a mistake — I really wasn’t getting a direct answer,” Paul said, according to Politico.
“Over the weekend, both meeting with Pompeo and then also discussing again on the phone with him and the President, you know, every time I talk to the President, I become more and more of the belief that he truly does share my notion that we’ve been at war too long and in too many places. Whether Director Pompeo does or not, he’s telling me yes, that he thinks the President is right,” Paul said.

“The President’s vision for the world is going to be his job. And, I think we’ll hear from him publicly. More specifically, that our foreign policy hasn’t worked in the past and that regime change hasn’t worked. So, these are the things I’ve been pushing for, and I felt like that in the end, I did get some satisfaction,” Paul continued.

“We have also had some discussions on another front with the President over the last couple of days. I’ve been very concerned that the FBI is allowed to look at American’s information without a warrant, and I’ve had some discussions with him over whether or not we could actually have an executive order from the President that simply says from now on we’re going to obey the 4th amendment and the FBI agents will have to get a warrant to look at these foreign surveillance databases. That’s a big step for me too,” Paul added.
“So, in all of these discussions, I came to the point of view that I would give Director Pompeo a chance, and I think that we’ll hear more from him over the next couple of days that hopefully will be heartening to those of the point of view that we need to have less war,” Paul concluded.

Rand Paul hit the nail on the head. Mike Pompeo is the man for the job at the State Department because he knows that President Donald Trump’s vision for the world needs to be his job. The President needs people in his administration who don’t stab him in the back or call him names.

Senator Paul was right to change his mind on Pompeo’s move to the State Department in support of Trump’s agenda. Once again, President Trump has proven himself to be the leader and master negotiator that we needed in the White House.