Day: May 23, 2018

Trump Supporters Can Help Build The Wall In New Congress Plan

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/qVRjqa
Since the very first day of Donald Trump’s campaign, he promised a border wall to protect the United States—are you ready to pitch in and help him get it up?

It was this promise that compelled many Americans to his side. But, after a year and a half in office, it seems we are no closer to this hallmark campaign promise.

It’s not Trump’s fault. Obstructionist Democrats and insider republicans have refused to give him the funds to start construction. They know millions of Americans want the wall. Also, they know the wall is needed to protect America from drug cartels and terrorists. Yet they still refuse to support it.

That’s not going to change the reality. Trump is going to get his wall.

We’ve seen him make good on his word, again and again. It’s about time people stopped doubting him. Already he’s achieved victories we thought impossible. He’s undone all of Obama’s legacy in just a year. Anyone that thinks he can’t get that wall built is living in a dream world.

Now we have learned that one conservative candidate has a brilliant idea for getting the funds.

From Breitbart:

A Tennessee congresswoman is introducing a bill that would allow the American people to donate money to help build President Donald Trump’s famed border wall.

Rep. Diane Black, a Tennessee Republican who is also running for governor of her state, promised to introduce H.R. 5876, legislation that would create a “border wall trust fund” to which average citizens could donate. The funds would be used for “whatever it takes to build the wall,” according to Fox News.

“While Democrats block commonsense border security and put illegal immigrants before our families, we are going to put America first. Real immigration reform cannot be achieved without a secure border — President Trump has been clear about this since day one,” Black said in a May 18 statement. “The most important job of the federal government is the safety and security of the American people, and if citizens in our country wish to contribute to this effort, they absolutely should be given the opportunity.”

This is very interesting. Considering how passionate Americans are to see the border secured, this could bring in the cash very quickly.

If this bill is passed, I wouldn’t be surprised if we got the money in a day. Congress greatly underestimates the American people. Liberals hate us. They think we’re selfish, stupid, and easily manipulated. But despite their best efforts at controlling us, we struck back by electing Donald Trump. Is there anything the American people can’t do?

The concept of creating a fund like this will eliminate the government’s control over the project. Congress is delaying the wall, simply over funds. Even though Trump promised Mexico will ultimately pay for it. It’s the only power Congress has in stopping the wall. But if this fund is created, they will lose entirely. Enough money could be raised in short order.

You better believe liberals are panicking over this bill. If it gets passed, they’re done. They know the money would be raised in a matter of time. They would not be able to stop the building of the wall. Their scheme to use illegal immigrants to manipulate the government would be dashed. Don’t be surprised to see plenty of opposition to this bill.

All the more reason to support it.

BREAKING News Out Of Russia… THEY BUILT IT!!! THIS IS NOT GOOD FOR AMERICA!

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/xGND4S
Russian president Vladimir Putin has unveiled a new weapon. The unmanned underwater Poseidon drone carries nuclear warheads and is capable of creating a 300-foot tsunami that would destroy any coastal city.

In his state of the nation address, Putin proudly touted Russia’s newest weapon. During the address to the Federal Assembly on March 1, Putin described a plethora of nuclear weapons he said Russia was developing. But one of these proposed weapons, an autonomous submarine, stood out among the depictions of falling warheads and nuclear-powered cruise missiles.

The Russian government reportedly leaked a diagram of such a weapon in 2015 that suggested it would carry a 50-megaton nuclear bomb about as powerful as Tsar Bomba, the largest nuclear device ever detonated.
The nuclear-powered underwater drone capable of destroying enemy naval bases and causing huge tsunamis is under construction in Russia, according to a state news agency, TASS. The Poseidon will be able to carry a nuclear warhead with a capacity of up to two megatons, a source told TASS.

The drone will have a speed of 60-70 knots and will be operational at a depth of more than 1km. According to the chief naval commander and as reported by the Mirror UK, the trials of the drone’s basic element, the small-sized nuclear powerplant, have already been carried out.
“It will be possible to mount various nuclear charges on the ‘torpedo’ of the Poseidon multipurpose seaborne system, with the thermonuclear single warhead… to have the maximum capacity of up to 2 megatonnes in TNT equivalent,” the source claimed. With its nuclear munition, the underwater drone “is primarily designed to destroy reinforced naval bases of a potential enemy,” the source added.

Rex Richardson, a physicist, told Business Insider: “A well-placed nuclear weapon of yield in the range 20 MT [megatons] to 50 MT near a sea coast could certainly couple enough energy to equal the 2011 tsunami and perhaps much more. “Taking advantage of the rising-sea-floor amplification effect, tsunami waves reaching 100 meters [330 feet] in height are possible.”

According to a Kremlin translation (PDF) of Putin’s remarks, the Russian president said the autonomous drone would quietly travel to “great depths,” move faster than a submarine or boat, “have hardly any vulnerabilities for the enemy to exploit,” and “carry massive nuclear ordnance.” “It is really fantastic,” he said. “There is simply nothing in the world capable of withstanding them.”

Russia’s president also claimed that the Poseidon will have “hardly any vulnerabilities” and said it would carry a “massive nuclear ordinance”. Russian Navy Commander-in-Chief Sergei Korolyov later said that the new weapon would enable the fleet to accomplish a broad range of missions in waters adjacent to the enemy territory.

New York Judge Just Censored Trump’s Twitter Account

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/pXAXfc
A federal judge in New York just delivered a blow to President Trump’s Twitter account.

She is censoring our America First President.
The Knight First Amendment Institute filed a lawsuit against President Trump’s Twitter account, claiming it’s unconstitutional for the president to block Twitter trolls, and this insane judge agreed.

U.S. District Court Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald said Trump’s Twitter account is a “public forum” and users cannot be excluded on the basis of their views.

So now, President Trump cannot silence abusive trolls – he just has to “take it.”

However, Twitter its self can exclude Trump supporters from the platform based on their views.

Liberal logic.
A federal judge in New York ruled Wednesday that President Donald Trump cannot lawfully block critics from his personal @realDonaldTrump Twitter account.

U.S. District Court Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald explained Trump’s Twitter account is properly thought of as a “public forum” from which users may not be excluded on the basis of their views.

“We hold that portions of the @realDonaldTrump account — the “interactive space” where Twitter users may directly engage with the content of the President’s tweets — are properly analyzed under the ‘public forum’ doctrines set forth by the Supreme Court, that such space is a designated public forum, and that the blocking of the plaintiffs based on their political speech constitutes viewpoint discrimination that violates the First Amendment,” the decision reads.

For purposes of the First Amendment, a public forum is an open space reserved for free exchange or expression of opinion. Government interference in such spaces is subject to a high degree of judicial scrutiny.
The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University organized the lawsuit.

Sick Judge Just Ruled Against Trump – He Can’t Protect Himself From Vicious Attackers

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/BXz9qm
In a bizarre ruling that has many shaking their heads, a federal judge has deemed it unconstitutional for President Donald Trump to block anyone on social media. It is a victory of sorts for far left hecklers like Rosie O’ Donnell, Stephen King, and many others, even of the not so famous variety.

Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, ruled that it is unconstitutional for President Trump to block anyone on the social media platform simply because they disagree with him or his policies. The judge states that because President Trump is a government official, using social media in his official capacity as a public forum. The president cannot censor dissent or opposing views as this is considered viewpoint discrimination and in violation of the First Amendment.

Judge Buchwald issued the ruling in a lawsuit filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University stating the fact that President Trump’s Twitter account predates his time in the White House is irrelevant. The fact is that he is in the White House now and serving as the President. He works for the American people, all of them, even those that strongly disagree or troll him on the internet.

She suggested in her 75-page opinion that Trump could have ignored his opponents’ reply tweets, stating in her ruling – “This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, ‘block’ a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States. The answer to both questions is no.”
According to the Hill, “the court’s ruling is a major win for the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which brought the lawsuit on behalf of seven people who were blocked from the @realDonaldTrump account because of opinions they expressed in reply tweets.

Buchwald, who was appointed by former President Clinton, rejected Trump’s argument that the First Amendment does not apply in this case and that the president’s personal First Amendment interests supersede those of the plaintiffs.

She suggested in her 75-page opinion that Trump could have ignored his opponents’ reply tweets.

“No First Amendment harm arises when a government’s ‘challenged conduct’ is simply to ignore the [speaker], as the Supreme Court has affirmed ‘that it is free to do,’ ” she wrote. “Stated otherwise, ‘a person’s right to speak is not infringed when government simply ignores that person while listening to others,’ or when the government ‘amplifies’ the voice of one speaker over those of others.”

Buchwald explained that blocking someone on Twitter goes further than just muting them.

“Muting preserves the muted account’s ability to reply to a tweet sent by the muting account, blocking precludes the blocked user from ‘seeing or replying to the blocking user’s tweets’ entirely,” she said.”

The lawsuit also named White House social media director and assistant to the president Daniel Scavino as Defendant in the lawsuit. However, in an interesting twist on the ruling Judge Buchwald did not order President Trump or Scavino to unblock the individual plaintiffs in the case or those previously blocked for dissenting views or prohibit them from blocking others from the account based on their views as the plaintiffs’ had asked.

Instead she stated her belief that a declaratory judgment should be sufficient, stating in her ruling – “Because no government official is above the law and because all government officials are presumed to follow the law once the judiciary has said what the law is, we must assume that the President and Scavino will remedy the blocking we have held to be unconstitutional.”

Naturally, the left took this portion of the ruling to mean that all those previously blocked must be unblocked immediately. Director of the Knight First Amendment Institute, Jameel Jaffer, tweeted a screenshot of that specific line from Buchwald’s opinion with the caption – “Clock’s ticking @realDonaldTrump & @DanScavino.