BREAKING: Trump’s Lawyer Double Agent? Just Stabbed Him In The Back With What He Gave To FBI
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
SOURCE : https://goo.gl/YQqb23
Conservatives were stunned when the news broke that the FBI had raided the office of President Trump’s personal attorney. The pretense for this raid was in the context of the ongoing investigation into the 2016 Presidential election, and whether or not there was any interference.
Initially, this investigation was constantly called the “Russia collusion” story, but much like “global warming” that is now called “global climate change” this too has transitioned due to the lack of evidence. Despite over a year of constant investigation, examination and questioning, the Special Counsel Robert Meuller haven’t presented anything that looks like collusion, or influence or anything that would implicate the Trump campaign.
They have, however, uncovered a few liberal inconsistencies that have caused investigations into those who insisted that there was Russia collusion, to begin with. However, as the investigation pivots and moves in another direction, the investigation that was supposed to look into foreign interference, is now investigating an accusation of infidelity between President Trump and a famous porn star.
Liberals everywhere seem extremely concerned with this alleged affair that would have taken places over a decade ago. That interest led to the raid, and subsequent seizure of documents and possible evidence from President Trump’s personal attorney earlier this week. The Slot gleefully reports that while this is potentially damaging, because of the personal files that this attorney no doubt has, it could be even worse, if the attorney has recordings of the President speaking confidentially, and off the record:
“Donald Trump’s associates are reportedly freaking out because his lawyer, Michael Cohen, may have inadvertently handed the FBI a gold mine of private business and political conversations he secretly recorded. In an amazing twist of fate, the recordings that Cohen attempted to use as leverage against Trump’s associates may have come back to haunt all of them, and I, for one, could not be more amused.
The Washington Post reports that, according to one source, it was Cohen’s ‘standard practice’ to secretly record business calls. The source knows this because, apparently, Cohen, a beneficiary of New York’s one party consent laws, played the recordings for top Trump advisors. Two other sources said he recorded political conversations, too.Though they don’t know where Cohen kept the recordings, Trump’s allies are worried that the FBI may have gathered them when they raided Cohen’s office earlier this week. Oops!”
From the Post:
“Cohen, who served for a decade as a lawyer at the Trump Organization and is a close confidant of Trump, was known to store the conversations using digital files and then replay them for colleagues, according to people who have interacted with him.
‘We heard he had some proclivity to make tapes,’ said one Trump adviser, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation. ‘Now we are wondering, who did he tape? Did he store those someplace where they were actually seized? . . . Did they find his recordings?’
Investigators were also looking for any records related to adult-film star Stormy Daniels and ex-Playboy model Karen McDougal, who both received payments after alleged affairs with Trump.
In New York, a hearing was scheduled Friday over Cohen’s efforts to prevent the government from using material seized in the raids.
It is unknown whether Cohen taped conversations between himself and Trump. But two people familiar with Cohen’s practices said he recorded both business and political conversations. One associate said Trump knew of Cohen’s practice because the attorney would often play him recordings Cohen had made of his conversations with other top Trump advisers.”
“In the event that the FBI did obtain any of the recordings, however, they would by subject to review by the Justice Department and even a federal judge, who would make sure that the conversations were relevant to the search warrant and to protect attorney-client privilege for any non-criminal matters.
As this Nixonian tale unfolds, former Watergate prosecutor Nick Akerman confirmed to the Post that in any search for evidence, people being recorded discussing potential crimes they committed sure does help. ‘If you are looking for evidence, you can’t do any better than people talking on tape.’ Thanks, Nick!”