Day: June 7, 2017

BREAKING: Trump Just Announced New FBI Director And Shocks Everyone With Who He Picked

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
There’s been much nail biting and anticipation from the country, waiting to see who would replace James Comey as director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Despite the fact that everyone hated Comey before he was fired, this didn’t keep the left from complaining and crying foul when the President fired him.

The short list for replacements was also a source of much pain and suffering for liberals (of course, because what does President Trump do that they aren’t pained to the point of death over). They included names like Rep. Congressman Trey Gowdy and the well-respected Sheriff David Clarke. However, just hours before James Comey is to testify about his actions to Congress, the President has finally let the Nation in on who he’s endorsing for a replacement.

This comes not a moment too soon since the entire country is ready to get past the much hoped for scandal by the left, and move toward letting the President do his job. The report of the nomination came, of course, on Twitter (because how else would our POTUS let us know about something like this):
Via Breitbart News:

“President Donald Trump has nominated Christopher Wray as the new FBI director.

‘I will be nominating Christopher A. Wray, a man of impeccable credentials, to be the new Director of the FBI,’ the president announced on Twitter on Wednesday morning. ‘Details to follow.’

Wray served as the Associate Deputy Attorney General in former President George W. Bush’s administration and was promoted to the assistant attorney general for the criminal division, before he left to work in the private sector as a partner at the Washington law firm King & Spalding.

During his time in government, he oversaw the highly publicized Enron case and oversaw the legal aspects of the war on terror after 9/11, according to King & Spalding’s website.

He also served as Governor Chris Christie’s personal attorney during the bridgegate scandal.

Last week, Christie praised Wray as an “outstanding lawyer,” after it was revealed that he was under consideration.

“He has absolute integrity and honesty, and I think that the president certainly would not be making a mistake if he asked Chris Wray to be FBI director,” Christie said.

Trump’s choice earned praise from Norm Eisen, a Brookings Institute fellow and former ethics czar for former president Obama.

“Good choice. Oversaw Enron case, which I also spent years of my life on,” Eisen wrote on Twitter. “He was very fair. I endorse.”
Finding someone with bi-partisan love was always going to be a challenge, but it looks like the President may have done it.

Even the New York Times doesn’t seem to have anything bad to say about him:

“Mr. Wray is a safe, mainstream pick from a president who at one point was considering politicians for a job that has historically been kept outside of politics. Mr. Wray, a former assistant attorney general overseeing the criminal division under President George W. Bush, is likely to allay the fears of F.B.I. agents who worried that Mr. Trump would try to weaken or politicize the F.B.I.

Mr. Wray, two administration officials said, is a hybrid pick for Mr. Trump: He is a seasoned criminal lawyer, who bonded with Mr. Christie when both were young attorneys in the Justice Department, and a highly regarded criminal defense lawyer who represented Mr. Christie in the aftermath of the scandal over traffic jams that rocked his governorship.

That his political skills were honed in the crucible of scandal gave him an edge over the other finalist, John S. Pistole, the former deputy director of the F.B.I. and head of the Transportation Security Administration, the officials said. He managed to soothe and counsel the volatile Mr. Christie, a Trump ally.”

I’ve no doubt that the liberal media will be all over this, finding things to pick apart about the guy who has dared to find favor with our President, but for now it’s nice to know that the wheels of justice might be moving forward and America can start putting the pieces of our law enforcement back together again.

Until tomorrow, when everyone has time to dig up dirt on the guy. Enjoy the peace now, because the games are about to begin.

Muslim-Loving U.S. Mayor Instantly Regrets Flooding Town With Refugees After SICK Surprise On His Doorstep

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Ever since Trump cracked down on migrants invading our country, liberals around the country have been fighting tooth and nail, continuing to blast our president as being a racist, even though Trump’s true intentions are to keep our country safe. Many Americans in these cities are outraged at how their cities and towns are being invaded by illegals and refugees, as these liberal mayors and governors continue to put their own agenda above the will of the very people who they were elected to represent. Well now a mayor in Vermont is getting a brutal wake-up call after infesting his town with Muslims, after the nasty gift that was dropped in his lap by pissed off residents in his town.

Angry Americans in Rutland, Vermont, have just gotten huge revenge against both Obama and Mayor Christopher Louras, voting out the five-term mayor who worked hand-in-hand with Obama to force the influx of Syrian refugees in Vermont, where Louras helped negotiate the controversial refugee settlements with a federal contractor despite the angry outcries of his people.
“Mayor Louras had negotiated an unpopular refugee deal behind closed doors with the United States Committee for Refugees and Immigrants,” WND reported. “USCRI is one of nine exclusive contractors that get paid by the U.S. State Department for every refugee they place into U.S. cities and towns.”

But after his antics went against the will of the people, his entire career as a mayor went down in flames last week during in the tiny city’s recent election, where his opponent David Allaire completely slaughtered him, winning by 52 percent of the vote.

“That’s not just a win, that’s a drubbing,” said Don Chioffi, an activist who supported the upstart candidate Allaire. WND reports that Louras came out last year and announced that the city would be taking in hordes of Syrian and Iraqi refugees, without even giving a second thought to what the people of Rutland wanted. WND reported:

Louras came out last April and “announced,” much to the surprise of his residents, that the city would be taking in up to 100 Syrian refugees in fiscal 2017 along with others from Iraq. The announcement divided the city among those who wanted to welcome the refugees – no questions asked – and those who thought the refugee program was being dictated without any local input and with very little information. Protests and counter-protests were organized, attracting national media attention.

Unfazed by the division it caused in Rutland, a State Department contractor opened an office and started placing Syrians into the community.
More than 98 percent of Syrian refugees are Sunni Muslim while about 75 percent of Iraqi refugees are either Sunni or Shiite, and they’re just now starting to show up in a small town that doesn’t have a single mosque.

But Louras would soon pay a hefty price for his reckless disregard for the sentiments of his citizens, as City Councilor David Allaire won a four-way race for mayor, stopping Louras from gaining a sixth term.
Similarly to how the mainstream media was in the bag for Hillary Clinton throughout the presidential election, Incumbent Allaire got no help from the local media, and it was thought that cocky Louras would simply walk away with the election. But the will of the people in the end prevailed, and supporters were able to bypass newspapers and TV stations by using social media to get their message out about Louras’ plan to infest their city with unvetted vermin from the Middle East. Local activist Don Chioffi, an ACT for America chapter leader in Rutland stated:

“In their sacrilegious and diabolical effort to squelch the truth, they won’t put it out there, so it’s hard to emphasize how important this victory is because the leftist media just doesn’t give you a fair shake, and we went into it expecting that. We knew we wouldn’t get a fair shake.”

This story just proves that no matter how many malcontents we have in positions of power actively plotting for the destruction of our country, WE THE PEOPLE will always win, as we refuse to have the blood of our ancestors who fought and died for this country to simply be pissed away by these liberal asshats. More cities and towns across America need to do exactly what the town of Rutland did, and send these morons a clear message that we will not comply with their globalist and borderless society BS agenda!

El Chapo’s Cash Won’t Be Used On Trump’s Wall So Look Who Showed Up With $21 Bil For It Overnight

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
President Donald Trump was recently presented with an incredible surprise of who could be paying for one of his most important and expensive campaign promises when Texas Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to use $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. The ingenious and perfectly ironic funding source for this important safety feature was met with as many road blocks as the idea for the wall itself. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.

The only thing that’s been holding America’s safety and security back is the ability to fund the 40-foot tall wall that’s expected to stretch approximately 1,000 miles along the U.S. – Mexico border. Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date.

“Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported.

Original estimates for the cost of this project came in at $12 to $15 billion, however, Bernstein Research, who calculates total building cost believes it could actually come in somewhere around $15 billion to $25 billion. The Department of Homeland Security agrees, estimating a specific $21.6 billion price tag for this massive project, according to Politifact. While that total is in excess of the $14 billion taken from El Chapo upon his arrest, the financing problem could soon be solved if Alabama Senator Luther Strange gets his way.

Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.

Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called Sanctuary Cities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.
The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.

Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.

This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.

The next best thing to using a drug lord’s seized money earned from abusing our border is to make Sanctuary Cities pay for it. They can’t make their own laws to harm people and force other people to pay for it too.