Day: June 23, 2017

Obama’s DHS Head Admits: Russia DID NOT Rig U.S. Election
Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Under oath, Jeh Johnson also admits Dem lack credible evidence for their narrative

(Infowars) – The Russian government did not interfere with or alter votes in the 2016 election, said former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson under oath.

“To my current knowledge, the Russian government did not through any cyber intrusion alter ballots, ballot counts or reporting of election results,” Johnson told the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday. “I know of no evidence that through cyber intrusion, votes were altered or suppressed in some way.”
The Democratic National Committee also turned down his agency’s offer to protect its network despite being warned about hacks, Johnson said.

“Sometime in 2016, I became aware of a hack into systems of the Democratic National Committee,” he continued. “…I pressed my staff to know whether DHS was sufficiently proactive, and on the scene helping the DNC identify the intruders and patch vulnerabilities.”

“The answer, to the best of my recollection, was not reassuring: the FBI and the DNC had been in contact with each other months before about the intrusion, and the DNC did not feel it needed DHS’s assistance at that time.”

Soon after, the DNC’s emails were released by WikiLeaks just prior to the Democratic National Convention last summer, leading to DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schulz’s resignation days later.

Johnson then attempted to salvage the narrative in his testimony, saying the Russian government under Vladimir Putin’s orders “orchestrated cyberattacks on our nation for the purpose of influencing our election,” despite the fact he admitted they lack tangible evidence showing the Russians had any measurable effect on the U.S. election.

It’s worth noting that that former FBI Director James Comey offered to write an op-ed last summer making the case that the Russians were meddling in the U.S. election, but the Obama administration rejected the offer, likely confident that Hillary Clinton would win regardless of outside interference.

“The White House shut it down,” one source told Newsweek magazine in March. “They did their usual – nothing.”

BREAKING: Trump Just Gave Susan Rice & Barack H. Obama TERRIBLE News

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
The Angry Patriot reported earlier this week that the official government records revealing Obama’s spying had been secretly moved to the Obama Presidential Library preventing a probe.

Now, Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, has revealed that President Trump has the power to retrieve the documents, which are still considered federal records (via The Gateway Pundit).

Watchdog group Judicial Watch filed a series of lawsuits attempting to obtain valuable information relating to the “unmasking” of then-candidate Trump and his associates during the 2016 presidential election.

American spy agencies are continuously monitoring foreign communications, and there is a frequent incidental capture of American persons communicating with foreigners.

It is a violation of our constitutional rights to be subject to a search without a warrant. Thus, the identity of American persons captured in these communications is masked to protect their identity.

Investigators can order an “unmasking” if the identity of the U.S. person is essential to an ongoing investigation. There are strict guidelines preventing unjustified unmasking.

However, it has been discovered that former National Security Advisor Susan Rice was unmasking people associated with the Trump presidential campaign during the election.
This unmasking was politically motivated and highly controversial. It was also most likely illegal. However, former President Obama hid the documents detailing the unmasking at his presidential library before leaving office.

Any documents in a presidential library are sealed for five years ensuring that the documents proving Susan Rice’s guilt are kept hidden. However, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton claims that President Trump can obtain the records if he requests them.

“Yes, they are still federal records. They are under the control of the national archives and he can get ’em,” explains Fitton. “If he needs them to conduct his official duties he can get them. Subpoenas issued by Congress can get them. Special Counsel Mueller, if he decides to actually investigate real crimes like the unmasking, the illicit surveillance, the leaking–-he could get them if he issued subpoenas.”

Obama must be shaking in his boots. The former president painstakingly attempted to cover-up evidence of his administration’s crimes.

All President Trump needs to do is ask for the records, and we will know the truth.

What do you think about this comment below.

Trump: I Did Not Record Conversations With James Comey

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
President Donald Trump on Thursday tweeted that he did not record his conversations with then-FBI Director James Comey, putting to rest one of the biggest lingering mysteries surrounding the drama between the president and the FBI head he later dismissed.

Trump tweeted in May, shortly after he fired the FBI boss, that Comey “better hope that there are no ‘tapes’” of their conversations.

Media reports surfaced soon after Comey’s firing that revealed the existence of memos detailing conversations between the president and Comey.

The White House dodged questions about whether tapes existed until Thursday.
“Lordy, I hope there are tapes,” Comey told Congress during testimony earlier this month.

The former FBI head said Trump asked for his “loyalty” during a January dinner, and that the president told him to “let it go” in regard to an investigation into former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Comey said in his testimony to Congress that he took that as a request from Trump to end the probe of Flynn.

During a press conference earlier this month, Trump denied asking Comey for his loyalty and pushing for him to drop the Flynn investigation.

“I hardly know the man, I’m not going to say I want you to pledge allegiance. Who would do that? Who would ask a man to pledge allegiance, under oath?” Trump said.

REVOLT! Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein Calls for Investigation into Obama, Lynch, & Hillary

Check The My New Channel : https://goo.gl/pAHH18
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
James Comey testified the ex-attorney general Loretta Lynch requested that he call the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails a “matter.”

Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee Thursday, noting that Lynch’s request made him feel “queasy.” Feinstein said she would have had “a queasy feeling, too.”

In an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Feinstein, the committee’s top democrat, said she didn’t know if Lynch was providing cover for the Clinton campaign, but said the request would have given her “a queasy feeling, too.”

“I think we need to know more about that,” the California senator said. “And there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the judiciary committee take a look at that.”

Feinstein was firm, however that an investigation into Lynch’s conduct with the Clinton campaign should be separate from the current Congressional investigation into potential ties between President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia.
“I don’t think we should mix the two,” Feinstein said. “I don’t know whether it’s obstruction of justice. I don’t intend to draw any conclusions until investigations are finished,”
Comey stated that when he asked Lynch if she was going to authorize him to confirm the existence of the Clinton email investigation, her answer was, “Yes but don’t call it that. Call it a ‘matter’.” When Comey asked why, he said, Lynch wouldn’t give him an explanation. “Just call it a matter,” she said.

Comey said that it made him very uncomfortable as it was NOT the truth.

“I don’t know whether it was intentional or not but it gave the impression that the Attorney General [Lynch] was looking to align the way we talked about our work with the way the political campaign was describing the same activity, which was inaccurate,” Comey added.

When asked by Texas Sen. John Cornyn if it would be fair to say Lynch had a “conflict of interest” in the Clinton email investigation, Comey answered in the affirmative. “That’s fair,” he said.

When Obama and the Clintons lose Diane Feinstein, it is significant. This could be a huge turning point. Feinstein is one of the most powerful leaders the Democrats have and she comes with incredible credibility.

This could very well be the crack in the door that swings it wide open.

The Comey hearings told us more about the Obama Justice Department than it did the Trump administration. Comey testified that Trump did not obstruct justice, but that Lynch did.

I may disagree with Feinstein most of the time, but she has proven over the decades to prefer honesty and integrity over partisan politics. She is also a bulldog. When she bites, she does not let go.

I have no doubt that she already has her team doing their own digging. We know that the more she digs, the more she will find.

Dianne Feinstein loves her party and she is smart enough to know that this whole issue is damaging. I expect that she will be uninvited to any further Clinton and Obama Christmas parties!