BREAKING: Sarah Palin Suing New York Times For Defamation

BREAKING: Sarah Palin Suing New York Times For Defamation

Sarah Palin is suing The New York Times for defamation, according to documents filed in federal court Tuesday that were obtained by The Daily Caller.

The lawsuit has to do with an editorial the NYT ran on June 14 that falsely smeared Palin as inciting the 2011 shooting of Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords by a mentally ill man. There is no evidence to support the NYT’s implication that Palin played a role in inciting the Giffords shooting.

“Mrs. Palin brings this action to hold The Times accountable for defaming her by publishing a statement about her that it knew to be false: that Mrs. Palin was responsible for inciting a mass shooting at a political event in January 2011,” Palin’s suit states.

“Specifically, on June 14, 2017, The Times Editorial Board, which represents the ‘voice’ of The Times, falsely stated as a matter of fact to millions of people that Mrs. Palin incited Jared Loughner’s January 8, 2011, shooting rampage at a political event in Tucson, Arizona, during which he shot nineteen people, severely wounding United States Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, and killing six, including Chief U.S. District Court Judge John Roll and a nine-year-old girl.”

The lawsuit states that the paper “published and promoted its Editorial Board’s column despite knowing that the linchpin of its ‘sickening pattern’ of politically-incited shootings was the false assertion that Mrs. Palin incited Loughner to murder six people, among them a child and federal judge, and seriously wound numerous others.”

It goes on to state: “As the public backlash over The Times’ malicious column mounted, it responded by making edits and ‘corrections’ to its fabricated story, along with half-hearted Twitter apologies–none of which sufficiently corrected the falsehoods that the paper published. In fact, none mentioned Mrs. Palin or acknowledged that Mrs. Palin did not incite a deranged man to commit murder.”
Palin claims the editorial “exceeded the bounds of legality, decency and civility by publishing the false and defamatory column.”

The full lawsuit can be seen below.

Sarah Palin sues the New York Times for defamation by Peter Hasson on Scribd
In the NYT’s editorial, which has since been updated, the editors claimed there was a “clear” link to incitement between Jared Loughner’s attempted assassination of Giffords, and a map Palin had created that placed crosshairs over districts that Republicans needed to flip in the 2012 election. No such link exists.

CNN’s Jake Tapper pointed out in response to the NYT editorial that “even way back in Jan 2011 we knew that Loughlin’s obsession began 3 years before the Palin map.” Tapper made that same exact point back in 2011 when he worked for ABC.

After harsh criticism in the media, the NYT finally added a correction that read: “An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established.”

The NYT editorial followed the attempted mass assassination of Republican lawmakers by a left-wing Bernie Sanders supporter, who espoused anti-Republican rhetoric on his Facebook page and belonged to several anti-GOP groups on Facebook, including one titled, “Terminate The Republican Party.

Whoa! Look What Melania Did To ALL Of Michelle’s Nasty Friends Sent To Ruin Her White House Dinner

Whoa! Look What Melania Did To ALL Of Michelle’s Nasty Friends Sent To Ruin Her White House Dinner

Michelle Obama may still be enjoying her ongoing post-presidential vacation, but that doesn’t mean this vindictive woman is ready to let go and just allow her replacement to shine in her new role. Perhaps she thought Melania Trump was an easy target when Michelle’s disgusting friends were sent to the State Dinner to do her dirty work, but their nasty plan didn’t exactly work as well as they had hoped. At some point, liberals need to stop underestimating the Trumps or face perpetual humiliation.

On top of being the picture of class, elegance, and compassion, nothing could burn Mrs. Obama more than Melania’s skyrocketing approval ratings. She’s won over the world with the way she carries herself, which is a refreshing sight for sore eyes use to seeing Michelle for eight years, who also seems to refuse to just go away. At the recent White House State Dinner, Melania was blindsided with a reminder that the Obamas are still sticking around and stalking them, even when they’re a world away in Indonesia. That still didn’t stop the classy couple from getting the perfect, effortless revenge.

Perhaps it’s Melania’s perfection that the left can’t stand since they have nothing else to criticize her for. However, the liberal media just found something to target her for and are probably wishing that they just stuck to their duties of their job rather than doing Michelle any favors in their reporting of this event.

The Mirror reports:

“Melania Trump’s style has come a long way since Donald’s election campaign and we’ve seen her sporting much more tailored looks. But her most recent outfit to meet Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House, has been met with a bit of criticism.”

Melania wore a summery yellow gown that was not only fit for the season and reflective of her cheerful personality, but she looked stunning and appropriate it in. That opinion was apparently not shared among her detractors who thought it wasn’t the right ensemble for the occasion and criticized her appearance.

The main complaint seemed to be that her bold choice in pattern and color was better suited for a garden party rather than a formal event. However, the tailoring, neckline, and sleeve suggest otherwise and people who don’t dress nearly as classy as Melania are in no place to offer their two cents – especially when they have recently praised Michelle’s horrifically risque attire at an Italian cathedral that actually does have a very specific dress code.
While Michelle’s liberal media friends were quick to slam Melania for her dress, Melania handled it with class, making them regret their remarks by just being her incredibly elegant self. She didn’t have to do or say anything specifically since the comparison to the left’s “queen Michelle” was all too easy to make with pictures from her most recent vacation before this current one she’s on, which proved whose attire is really inappropriate.
It was only just a few short weeks ago that Michelle was spotted globe-trotting in Europe wearing several shirts that were holding on for dear life as to not expose her private parts. Even though she’s entitled to look as tacky as she wants, she didn’t even consider the venue when getting dressed. Since the left wants to condemn Melania for this very thing, they should be sure that their favorite first lady isn’t guilty of worse before making the ridiculous comparison.
“There are often subtle messages behind Melania’s outfits and perhaps with the yellow hue, she wanted to convey a sense of intellect as well as encouraging cheerfulness and inspiration,” the Mirror’s report continued. We can agree with this and as long as people are suggesting hidden clothing messages, Michelle’s speaks volumes as to the “woman” she is, which is nothing like Melania.

If the worst that Michelle and her media minions can say about Melania is that she wore a cheery dress to a supposedly somber occasion, then our first lady is excelling in her role. She’s not just a political icon, she’s a fashion icon and proves that with every dazzling ensemble she wear…and wears well. Surely this is a shocking sight to see after almost a decade of Michelle’s tasteless, often classless, and always unattractive outfits. She can keep her designers who want to dress her and not Melania because the Trumps have style down in spades and don’t need anyone’s help to look like Michelle.

Tennessee Issues Hilarious Response To California Travel Ban

Tennessee Issues Hilarious Response To California Travel Ban

The Tennessee Senate fired back at the California state government in a biting joint resolution issued in response to California’s travel ban.

The resolution encouraged the governor of Tennessee and the Speakers of the Tennessee House of Representatives and Senate to enact a similar travel ban against California, and urged the other 48 states of the Union to not follow California’s example.

California’s attorney general recently added four states to a list of states deemed to have laws discriminating against LGBT people. California has banned state-funded travel to these states as a show of opposition to those laws, all of which were passed to better protect religious liberties. Tennessee, which is included on that list, pointed out the folly of such a travel ban in the bulk of a joint resolution.
The resolution further stated that California’s travel ban was an attempt to “[impose] their unfounded moral judgment” on other states, and amounted to one sovereign entity telling another sovereign entity how to conduct its government.

Tennessee’s senate resolved to send a copy of this resolution to state legislatures throughout the nation to encourage them to “[take] action against this type of blackmail.”

BREAKING: Loretta Lynch “Pleads Fifth,” Wants to Hide Her Sick Crime

BREAKING: Loretta Lynch “Pleads Fifth,” Wants to Hide Her Sick Crime

A bipartisan letter was released last week requesting comment from former Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Lynch has refused to comply with the letter as she continues to prevent an investigation into her old boss Barack Obama.

However, members of Congress should not expect cooperation from the disgraced Attorney General. When she was asked to testify about the Iran deal, Lynch refused to cooperate and repeatedly pled the Fifth (via The Washington Free Beacon).

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), and then-Representive Mike Pompeo (R-KS), launched an investigation into Obama’s Iran deal last year and requested comment from the then-Attorney General.

Lynch never acknowledged the investigation and asked her underling, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik, to take the heat for her.

Peter Kadzik replied to the request for comment by refusing to answer any of the questions posed. He claimed the administration was unable to comment publicly on the details of the $1.7 billion Iran deal.

Late into Obama’s presidency, his administration negotiated a secret deal with the Iranian government. The final deal was a huge win for the Iranian government and American hostages were released shortly afterwards.

Obama denied that the $1.7 billion was paid in exchange for the hostages. However, representatives from his administration have remained remarkably silent about any other possible motivations.
Sen. Rubio and Rep. Pompeo were outraged that the Obama administration refused to cooperate when they were still in power.

“It is frankly unacceptable that your department refuses to answer straightforward questions from the people’s elected representatives in Congress about an important national security issue,” the pair wrote in a follow-up letter. “Your staff failed to address any of our questions, and instead provided a copy of public testimony and a lecture about the sensitivity of information associated with this issue.”

“This has become the Obama administration’s coping mechanism for anything related to the Islamic Republic of Iran—hide information, obfuscate details, and deny answers to Congress and the American people,” the letter continued.

Lawmakers close to the Iran deal claim that the Obama administration refuses to answer any questions because the answers would be more damning than any consequences of ignoring a congressional inquiry.

We can expect Lynch to maintain this strategy as Congress probes her role in the unmasking of American citizens. However, Lynch no longer has the Obama administration in power to cover her illegal acts.

What do you think about this comment below.

BREAKING: New Evidence Proves Michael Flynn Was Framed, What’s Your Response?

BREAKING: New Evidence Proves Michael Flynn Was Framed, What’s Your Response?

Michael Flynn is a hero and a dedicated Army legend who understands the threat of radical Islam. He was a staunch supporter of President Trump early on. Unfortunately, he fell victim to the vindictive Deep State and had to resign from his position as National Security Advisor.

New evidence, via Circa, confirms what we patriots have known all along. Flynn’s fall was carefully orchestrated by enemies in the unelected Washington establishment. Bitter FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe brought down Flynn in the act of political revenge! Flynn is innocent!

McCabe was out to get Flynn due to his involvement in a sexual discrimination case leveled against the FBI Deputy Director by one of the bureau’s top anti-terror agents.

Supervisory Special Agent Robyn Gritz was highly respected in the FBI. Her counter-terrorism work was praised by all her colleagues. During her time, she tracked down terrorists, rescued hostages, and was even on the case to find the disappeared agent Robert Levinson in Iran.

Her prestigious career was cut short by the conniving of Andrew McCabe, who recently has been the force behind the Russia probes into the Trump administration. McCabe is one of the biggest puppets the Deep State has it its disposal.

Gritz went to work under McCabe in 2012. Under him, she began receiving negative reviews for the first time in her career. Eventually, the truth came out: this was a case of sexual discrimination. McCabe was doing all he could to sabotage Gritz–including tarnishing her reputation.
Eventually, Gritz’s case went national. She became the central figure on a media exposé into harassment and discrimination in the FBI. Michael Flynn, who was familiar with Gritz due to her counterterrorism work, took up her cause.

Flynn wrote a letter in support of Gritz while he was an Army Lieutenant General and Chief of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Other Federal leaders did the same asserting their willingness to serve as witnesses in Gritz’s hearing.

This sent McCabe into a rage. He got the FBI to promptly send a lawyer to block Flynn and the other intelligence officials from contributing to the Gritz case. Flynn even went public in defense of his colleague, offering an interview on NPR in 2015 in which he testified to her work ethic and invaluable service to this country.

Andrew McCabe never forgot what Flint did. He’s been harboring resentment for the last few years. And when he saw Flint placed in such a high post by a President whose loyalties lie with the people (as opposed to the globalist elite), he became hysterical. Thereafter. McCabe was on a mission to destroy Flynn at all cost.

McCabe used his FBI resources to publish the leaks making it look like Flynn was working inappropriately with Russia. It was all a set-up from the start. Flynn isn’t guilty; he attacked by cowardly men in a personal feud.

We have to put an end to the influence of the Deep State. It is a threat to our Republic. These heinous actors are unelected, but they do all they can to thwart our elected President. Trump has to destroy these swamp rats before they destroy him!