Day: May 17, 2018

As Robert Mueller’s Coup Attempt Reaches 1 Year, Rudy Giuliani Rips Him Apart

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/SjhKum
As Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s coup attempt against President Donald Trump reaches the one-year mark, fed-up Rudy Giuliani delivered a harsh warning for the deep state operative. You won’t want to miss this.

Finally, Amerian patriots are beginning to see the Trump administration fight back in a substantial way with the recent addition of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani. Instead of just playing defense, Giuliani is on the offensive and going after Mueller and his team of Democrat lawyers.

During a recent interview on Fox News‘ The Ingraham Angle with host Laura Ingraham, Giuliani said that the Special Counsel has nonthing on Trump and it’s time to go after Mueller and his gang of traitors who are being protected by Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the Department of Justice.
When Ingraham told Giuliani that even the mainstream media has recently admitted that Mueller has failed to come up with any connection between Trump and the Russians, Giuliani had some harsh words. “That’s been true from day one. It’s true today. They’re not going to be able to invent any evidence of that, and it’s a shame… plus they won’t answer Congress on how much money this is costing the American people. It’s costing us a fortune,” Giuliani said.

When Ingraham responded by suggesting that Mueller’s team will focus on some kind of obstruction claim, Giuliani lit them up. “For what? To recommend impeachment? They don’t get to do that. I mean, they get to send a report to Rosenstein on what they found. I guess they could gratuitously include a recommendation, but really they shouldn’t,” Giuliani replied.

In regards to any accusations brought against Trump, Giuliani said, “We can produce a memo for him that rebuts them a thousand percent.”

Ingraham then said that Mueller’s team may focus on Donald Trump Jr. and a meeting he had with a Russian woman who tricked him into meeting her in order to discuss the lifting of sanctions. Giuliani quickly put it into perspective, saying that when he was campaigning for president, all kinds of people approached him on a daily basis claiming to have information on Hillary Clinton. Giuliani said that he simply dismissed these random people who approached him to offer information.
When Ingraham asked if there was a single aspect of Mueller’s attacks on Trump that concerned him most, Giuliani said, “Yeah, their inability to reach a conclusion that is obvious and their unwillingness to recognize the damage this does to our country all over the world. There’s no reason for this investigation. There never was a good reason for it in the first place. This was engineered by Comey.”

Rudy Giuliani said that James Comey was responsible for starting the investigation by leaking information through a professor. “Comey should be under investigation, and the Clinton people wanted him fired before we did for what he did to her. That was totally unethical. Totally unethical to reveal all the facts incriminating her and then this specious argument that she shouldn’t be prosecuted,” he said.Then, Laura Ingraham asked if Rudy Giuliani thinks that Robert Mueller gave James Comey immunity.

“No, I don’t. I have no idea if he gave him immunity. I don’t know why he’s not being investigated. That troubles us because a lot of the President’s statements contradict Comey. They are much more logical than Comey’s but they contradict his. If you want to just believe Comey then you’re walking into a trap and Comey’s not been investigated. So, I don’t think we would sit him down for an interview unless Comey was investigated and treated in the same way,” Giuliani replied.

“I would represent any President through this kind of torture. This is not right for our country. That’s why I’m doing this. I’m doing it pro bono and I’m doing it because I believe that this is just plain wrong,” Giuliani added, according to Real Clear Politics.

Ingraham asked Giuliani what the optimal timeline is for Mueller to wrap up his report, and he replied, “They should do it today. As soon as possible. I think that they have the facts from which they can write their report. If you can write a fair report, fine, write it. If you’re going to write an unfair report, write it, and we will combat it. We’re ready to rip it apart, and we’re ready to rip them apart if that’s what they want. We would rather peacefully settle this and get it over with,” Giuliani warned.I could not agree more. Mueller’s time is up, and the country is tired of his political warfare against President Donald Trump. The fact that he was even allowed to begin the Russian investigation is absurd and an embarrassment to every American. In my opinion, it’s time for Trump to rip the Mueller investigation apart.

Mueller Hits PEAK DESPERATION – Look What He’s Planning to do NOW

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/Ny95nG
Things are not going so good for Special counsel Robert Mueller and his sham Russia witch-hunt.

Now, he’s looking to validate the debunked probe by dropping 2 terabytes of UNTRANSLATED social media content from so-called “Russian operatives” who “interfered” with the 2016 election.This is another stunt by team Mueller to keep this fraud probe in the news.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Wednesday revealed his office is prepared to flood two terabytes of Russian social media content — without any translation — into the court record to comply with a discovery request by one of the defendants in his collusion case.

The government’s lead attorney, Jeannie Sclafani Rhee, confirmed her office had compiled two terabytes of Russian-language social media content and confirmed little of it was translated.

“The government did not translate every single word and doesn’t have to,” she told the court.

The tactic was denounced by Eric Dubelier, the American attorney retained by Concord Management and Consulting — one of the three Russian companies indicted by Mueller last February as part of a broad indictment against 13 Russian individuals in his Russian collusion case. The defendants are accused of “conspiracy to defraud the United States” for interfering in the 2016 presidential election, the indictment said.

“We are most concerned with the release of massive amount of social media in Russian,” Dubelier told U.S. District Court Judge Dabney L. Friedrich, a Trump appointee. “They had five weeks to ramp up on discovery. There has been no, no discovery.”

A terabyte is the equivalent of 1,024 gigabytes of information. Another way to measure the quantity of information is that Mueller’s social media content could fill nearly 1,500 CD-ROMS.

One of Concord’s chief weapons against Mueller has been the Russian company’s request for discovery — the examination of evidence Mueller has collected concerning the charge of Russian collusion. The defense tactic could be used to embarrass Mueller and the U.S. intelligence community, as reported earlier by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Mueller originally filed the indictment as a high profile case to prove Russian collusion to “interfere” with the 2016 election. His only successful case in his investigation into Russian collusion was former Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos’ guilty plea to a single-count indictment.
Mueller’s case against the Russians was “more theater than prosecution,” said former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy, in describing the original indictment.

But Concord, one of the named defendants, hired an American law firm and asked for a “speedy trial” under federal rules. The firm notified the court the Russian company insisted on the right of discovery.

In a related move, Dubelier filed a motion on May 14 in which he told the court he moved “for an in camera inspection of the legal instructions provided to the grand jury regarding Count One of the Indictment.” He said the information could be used “to determine whether the instructions provided could support a motion to dismiss.”

Dubelier also denounced Mueller as illegitimate. He said in the filing that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein “licensed a Special Counsel who for all practical political purposes cannot be fired, to indict a case that has absolutely nothing to do with any links or coordination between any candidate and the Russian Government.”

“The risk here is acute, that is, a foreign corporation with no presence in the United States is indicted in an unprecedented case of a type never before brought by the DOJ for conspiring to defraud the United States purportedly by not complying with certain regulatory requirements that are unknown even to most Americans,” he continued.

The case resumes June 15.

Good Grief! Dems Now Claim the NRA is Part of Trump’s ‘Russia Collusion’

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/oXFM7U
For crying out loud, when will this absurd “Russia” story end?

If it’s up to Democrats, never.
They want to keep this insane story, that Americans are tired of, going and going.

Now, Senate Democrats claim they have documents that show the NRA “helped” the Russians collude with President Trump.Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee say they have obtained documents that suggest Russia used the National Rifle Association (NRA) to help President Trump‘s 2016 campaign.

The Democrats on Wednesday released a document outlining preliminary findings from their investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. It states that the Kremlin may have “used the NRA to secretly fund Mr. Trump’s campaign.”

“The Committee has obtained a number of documents that suggest the Kremlin used the National Rifle Association as a means of accessing and assisting Mr. Trump and his campaign,” the document reads.

The Democrats identified two figures of particular interest: Maria Butina, a Russian national living in the U.S., and Alexander Torshin, the deputy governor of the Central Bank of Russia. The Democrats noted that Butina, who worked as an assistant to Torshin, has refused to cooperate as a witness.

The document says that Butina and Torshin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, were key parts of the Kremlin’s effort to use the NRA to aid Trump.

“[Butina and Torshin] repeatedly offered the campaign back channels to Russia and relayed requests from President Putin to meet with Mr. Trump,” the committee said.

Both Butina and Torshin have ties to former NRA President David Keene and hosted him for a pro-gun conference in Russia. Butina founded Right to Bear Arms, the Russian equivalent of the NRA, and also started a business with former Trump adviser Paul Erickson.The Democrats said they have requested from Butina an interview and documents related to Torshin’s efforts to arrange a meeting between Putin and Trump. They are also looking into “possible use of the National Rifle Association (NRA) by Russia to contribute money to the Trump campaign,” according to the document.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is reportedly investigating whether the NRA accepted illegal contributions from Russians in the 2016 campaign. The NRA and its lobbying arm spent $30 million in support Trump’s campaign.

The Democrats noted Erickson and Keene have refused to cooperate.

The Hill has reached out to the NRA for comment.

The release from Democrats came after Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released hundreds of pages of transcripts of the panel’s interviews with participants at a controversial Trump Tower meeting in 2016. Donald Trump Jr. took that meeting after being promised dirt on then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton‘s campaign.

In their document, the Democrats said the transcripts are interviews with just five of the eight participants in the meeting.

“We still do not know the full story about the June 9 meeting at Trump Tower or, more broadly, the degree to which the campaign cooperated or communicated with Russia,” the Democrats said.

Liberals Can’t Impeach Trump, So Now They’re Trying to Get Him Assassinated

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/RccMMB
Everything liberals try to use in their attempts to get President Trump impeached has failed – from accusations of “racism” to their twisted Stormy Daniels narrative.

Robert Mueller’s Russia witch-hunt is also a bust, and after a year of intense investigation, no proof has been uncovered to show Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.
Now, in a desperate attempt to get rid of President Trump and his America First agenda, liberals are resorting to the unthinkable.

Celebrities, lying liberal media staffers, and reporters are all sending out a string of “dog whistles” to their unstable base, in hopes that someone will assassinate President Trump.
Chris Cillizza, a far-left staffer at the anti-Trump CNN, claims that a now-deleted tweet of his that flashed what looked like a rifle’s crosshairs over video of President Donald Trump, was an error. For a whole lot of reasons, this is difficult to believe, especially when you look at the basement-rated CNN’s history of “assassination dogwhistles” aimed at the president.

Intent matters, so we must first take a look at what CNN believes. This is fairly easy because time and again and again, CNN has told us that it believes images, rhetoric, and symbols can provoke and be to blame for violence, murder, and even political assassinations. CNN makes no secret of this belief.

And so, if CNN believes images, words, and symbols inspire violence, what are we left to conclude when CNN itself engages in behavior that it claims inspires violence?

The asking of the question answers the question.

Based on CNN’s own beliefs, it is perfectly reasonable to believe that when CNN tells its audience that Trump is “unmoored,” “unhinged,” and “un-American,” that this is what I call an “assassination dogwhistle” — a dangerous message sent out in a world filled with bad people that says the man in the Oval Office is a threat, mentally ill, and not one of us.

It is also reasonable to say the same about the following:

CNN’s parent company, Time Warner, was one of the sponsors of a play that depicts the gruesome assassination of President Trump. CNN has not only defended this sponsorship but encouraged people to go and see the play.
What’s more, with a glossy television and online profile, CNN rewarded a thug who attempted to rush Trump on stage during a campaign rally. CNN even portrayed this man as a victim. The message being sent here is crystal clear.

Watch CNN staffers “joke” about Trump’s plane crashing.

Worse still, in the run-up to Trump’s inauguration last year, CNN played a dangerous game of “What If” to inform its pro-Obama audience that if Trump were assassinated, the Obama administration would remain in power.

If CNN believes images promote violence, why did CNN point what looked like a sniper scope at Trump’s Oval Office window and then broadcast those images?

Which brings me to Cillizza’s appalling “crosshairs” tweet — here is a look:

I recorded the tweet if you want it pic.twitter.com/zkcbkOvulD

— Kevin (@kevinh07) May 15, 2018

Again, Cillizza claims it was all an accident, but based on CNN’s history above, we have every right to be skeptical of his denial. Moreover, Cillizza is a raging Trump hater, documented liar, and how odd these CNN “mistakes” never happen to Democrats.