Day: May 24, 2018

Left-Wing Media Tries to Spin Spygate, Cartoonist Scott Adams Exposes Their Lies

source: https://goo.gl/Bcy7ua
This week, we’ve learned bombshell revelations about what the FBI did to try to take Donald Trump’s campaign down. Naturally, the left-wing media tried to distort the facts in order to protect former President Barack Obama. However, cartoonist Scott Adams shut them down with just one tweet.

The unfolding drama of #SPYGATE can be a bit hard to follow. But it boils down to this: Obama, the Democrats, and their flunkies in the deep state tried to destroy Trump’s campaign. Using a made-up “dossier” of lies, they tried to frame Trump as a Russian puppet. The same dossier that CNN tried to break as “news” was used by our DOJ to acquire warrants to spy on Donald Trump. Meaning, they used false information to get a warrant to spy on an American citizen. Very illegal.

It only gets worse from there. The FBI, most likely on orders from Obama, sent at least one informant into the Trump campaign. This person pretended to be a Trump ally, trying to work his way into the team. His goal was to gather as much dirt on Trump as possible. Either so the FBI or DOJ could prosecute Trump over something he did wrong. But, Trump didn’t do anything wrong, so they got nothing.

Their entire scheme was built around the assumption that Trump was as corrupt as the Democrats. It all fell apart when they learned that he wasn’t. Big surprise.
Only now are we learning that agents in the FBI went to such great lengths to undermine our democracy. Think about it: Obama’s people tried to take down a legitimate candidate for President, to make sure Hillary Clinton won. Yeah, I think that trumps Watergate.

But what has the left-wing media done? Like sailors trying to bail water out of a sinking ship, they’ve tried to spin #SPYGATE. They are desperately hoping the American public doesn’t learn the truth about what the last administration was up to. Good luck.

Scott Adams, free thinker and creator of the comic Dilbert, decided to weigh in on the issue. Like much of his writings, he managed to expose the left’s stupidity in just a signal tweet.

President Donald Trump on Sunday demanded an investigation into whether the FBI or Justice Department infiltrated or surveilled his campaign for political purposes. Ever since, the spin has been intense, what with those who formerly had called Trump’s charges of spying a conspiracy theory suddenly deciding that any infiltration of his campaign by an informant was done to protect him.

If it all seems a bit much to take in, Scott Adams stepped up Wednesday to compile everything the mainstream media’s written about #SPYGATE so far into just one tweet. [Source: Twitchy]
That pretty much sums up what the media is trying to do. They first denied President Trump’s claims that Obama was spying on his campaign. Yet when the cat got out of the bag, they had nothing. They can’t go back and deny what they originally said. Also, they can’t ignore the fact that we know the FBI sent a spy.

What do they do? They actually tried to say the spy was there to “protect” Trump. Suurrrre. We’re buying that. Because you normally send spies into an organization (without their knowledge) to protect them. I guess it’s opposite day.

This is exactly why Americans have lost their faith in the mainstream media. They are so dishonest at this point. Journalists can’t even keep track of their own lies. Scott Adams brilliantly humiliated them with just a few words.

Because of their liberal bias, the media has given up on being honest, factual, and fair. They go out of their way to protect Democrats and slander Trump and his supporters. Even when the facts are plain as the nose on their faces, they try to spin it. It only ends up hurting them.

As you can imagine, many people online commended Adams’ comments.
We are about to see one of the most significant moments in American history. President Donald Trump has already ordered the DOJ to investigate this scandal. On top of that, they are reopening Hillary Clinton’s email server case.

There’s a very good chance that ALL the bones in the last administrations’ closet are going to come tumbling out. By the way, that’s why the left-wing media is so scared.

Mueller’s Latest Request Proves He’s at THE VERY END of His Rope

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/XGQn8z
Robert Mueller is at the end of his rope.

In a desperate effort to keep his sham Russia probe going, Mueller asked a federal judge to REJECT the “right to a speedy trial” against the 13 so-called election-interfering Russians and asked for an INDEFINITE DELAY to the trial.
So, in other words, it will never happen, and he can keep this garbage in the news through the 2018 midterms.

Clearly, Mueller has no case, and this witch-hunt should have ended eons ago.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller asked a federal judge Tuesday to reject the four-decade-old speedy trial law in the case against 13 Russians and three Russian companies and has asked for an indefinite delay to the Russian collusion trial.

It is the second time Mueller tried to delay the trial. Judge Dabney L. Friedrich, a Trump appointee, rejected the earlier request without comment and ordered the case to go forward.

One of the Russian companies — Concord Management and Consulting — entered the U.S., hired American lawyers, and demanded a speedy trial. The Speedy Trial Act is a 44-year old federal law that dictates that a federal criminal case must begin within 70 days from the date of the indictment.

The “complexity” of the case warrants excluding the speedy trial law and delaying the trial, Mueller argued in Tuesday’s court filing.

A “district court can, on its own motion or at the request of a party, grant an excludable continuance if ‘the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,’” Mueller wrote.

“This case also warrants a continuance and exclusion of time to accommodate the voluminous discovery at issue and to allow sufficient time for the Court to resolve certain outstanding procedural issues unique to discovery in this case,” he continued.

Former federal prosecutor and National Review Contributing Editor Andrew C. McCarthy told TheDCNF it was too late for Mueller to claim that the complexity of the case warranted a delay.
“Speedy trial rights belong to the defendant, and if the defendant pushes for a trial within the 70 days, the government has little cause to complain,” McCarthy said. “If the case was too complex, the government had the option of holding off on seeking an indictment until it was ready to proceed to trial. When a prosecutor files an indictment, it is tantamount to saying, ‘We are ready to go.’”

Mueller originally filed the indictment against the Russians on Feb. 16, charging that they “engaged in a multi-year conspiracy” to interfere with the 2016 presidential election. Because none of the defendants were U.S. citizens, law experts said it appeared unlikely that the case would ever go to trial.

McCarthy called the indictment “more theater than prosecution.”

On May 9, Eric A. Dubelier, a partner with Reed Smith, a prestigious American law firm that represents Concord, entered a not guilty plea in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. He also repeated his client’s interest for a speedy trial.

Dubelier has repeatedly notified the court he would insist on using “discovery” to review the “evidence” the special counsel had accumulated about their charge of Russian collusion. His use of discovery would compel Mueller to turn over the U.S. intelligence about Russian activities.

In response, Mueller informed the court on May 16 his office was prepared to enter two terabytes of Russian social media into the record, thereby flooding the docket with a huge amount of evidence, all of it in Russian. The volume could fill 3,000 CD-ROM discs.

It’s “inappropriate for a prosecutor to manufacture complexity and then contend that things are too complex,” McCarthy told TheDCNF. “If a prosecutor is disclosing mountains of foreign language materials without an understanding or explanation of their relevance to the case, that is a delaying tactic and an attempt to chew up the defendant’s resources.”

The tactic “is apt to make the presiding judge very angry,” he added.

Dubelier contended the voluminous evidence against the 13 Russians did not apply to Concord.

Friedrich has yet to rule on Mueller’s request for a delay.