Day: May 24, 2018

WATCH: Santa Fe Survivor Shuts Up Nancy Pelosi LIVE On CNN – Her Face Says It All

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/AvMK1f
Nancy Pelosi was made to look like a fool when she was confronted by a teenager who showed up logic and common sense. The teenager is a girl who recently survived the horrific events at the Santa Fe High School and made Nancy look like she could barely answer a question during the town hall event with CNN. It was so bad that even CNN’s Chris Cuomo got involved and chipped in a few pointers, leaving his fellow Democrat in the wind as she was on her own and couldn’t even muster an answer that wasn’t scripted, let alone anything that utilized common sense and reality.

They were talking about arming teachers and that’s where Pelosi struggled. Most teachers probably shouldn’t be armed, but every school in the nation should have armed and well-trained police to protect our students. We have guards at other places like banks, airports, and even public transportation areas like large train stops where people wait to go places like work, school, or a friends house. If Americans get protection in those locations, then why can’t our most precious children have the same benefit and protections while they’re in a house of learning?

Pelosi couldn’t even get an answer out that didn’t make people laugh at her. Her answer was so bad that she mentioned background checks. Meanwhile, background checks for legal firearm owners are already something that one must go through to do things the legal way. However, how does a background check stop a criminal from illegally attaining a weapon? It does not.

Pelosi followed with more “prayers” – the same thing Democrats constantly criticize Conservatives for. She then stated that arming teachers is not the answer. It may not be, but hiring armed police sure sounds great to most people who are in school with no protection.
Then Cuomo stepped in and pushed Pelosi for more because she seemed quite hypocritical on the topic.

Amanda Prestigiacomo wrote more: “Where does the government stand on arming and training our teachers, much in the way we use air marshals on airplanes?” asked Santa Fe senior Alexis Wilson.

Pelosi offered sympathies to Wilson over the s******g but concluded that she and her Democrat colleagues “do not think that is the solution.”

“Following a tragedy like this all we want to do is pray for the families, but I do not support arming teachers and the rest,” Pelosi stated.

Cuomo, moderating the town hall event, pressed Pelosi about her seeming hypocrisy on the issue.

“There’s a little bit of an either-or problem with how we’re trying to approach solutions. … The building we’re in now, the building you work in, the point of entry there is secure,” he said. “You don’t walk in with a trench coat with a shotgun underneath your jacket, and get in. It doesn’t happen, you know this.”
The CNN cameras panned to Wilson in the audience, who was clapping to show support for Cuomo’s pushback.

“Why can’t that be part of the equation?” Cuomo asked. “Talk about universal background checks, fine. Talk about mental health, how to identify them, money for treatment. But why either-or? Why not make the schools safer?”

“The children should not have to be worried about going to school as a place that violence can occur,” Pelosi responded. “You have to get to systemically stop people from having g**s who shouldn’t have g**s in the first place.”

It was a breath of fresh air to hear Cuomo push Pelosi and ask “why not make the schools safer?”

Does Nancy Pelosi want safe schools or is she too bent on pushing an anti-2A agenda? At her age, does she even care anymore? Why does Nancy Pelosi struggle so bad with a common sense approach to protecting children? If every school has armed police who are brave and well-trained, then it would most likely curb a lot of senseless violence.
Pair that with an overhaul of people individually treating each other better and we have one of the easiest ways to prevent more tragic incidents from happening. Armed guards and people treating each other better could easily be the answer.

People like Nancy Pelosi always ignore the reason “why” people commit horrible acts of violence. Instead, they focus on the item, not the reason why the person commits the act.

What is your idea for protecting schools? Do you think Nancy Pelosi was highly unprepared for the CNN town hall?

Write your ideas in the comment section below and share this story with a teacher or someone who has kids in school.

BREAKING News About Barack Obama… IT’S NOT GOOD!!!

source: https://goo.gl/LF51nL
In the wake of the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, many assumed then President Barack Obama’s tears were insincere; and it turns out, they were right. Leaked emails prove the Obama White House was using emotional propaganda to brainwash the public into accepting the degradation of their human rights.

Propaganda isn’t new to politicians, but it’s nice to have confirmed what most of us already know: gun control is literally being pushed on us by using emotional brainwashing. Obama advisers sought to “tap people’s emotions” for a huge gun-control push after the Sandy Hook shooting.

Rahm Emanuel famously said that “you never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” and apparently that included the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre. Two days after the horrific school shooting, the Chicago mayor advised then-Education Secretary Arne Duncan to “tap peoples emotions” as they discussed how to leverage the tragedy to push for gun-control restrictions, according to emails published Wednesday by the Baltimore Post.

“What are your thoughts?” asked Duncan in an email with the subject line “CT shootings” dated Dec. 16, 2012. Emanuel advised him to move quickly. “Go for a vote this week asap before it fades,” he said. “Tap peoples emotion. Make it simple assault weapons.” Duncan replied, “Yup- thanks,” to which Mr. Emanuel responded, “When I did brady bill and assault weapons for Clinton we always made it simple. Criminals or war weapons.” –Washington Times
The 10-minute exchange came about two years after Emanuel, who served for five years as senior adviser to President Bill Clinton, left his post as White House chief of staff under President Barack Obama to enter the 2011 Chicago mayoral race.

This is simply more evidence of what we already knew: the easily manipulated have been being brainwashed by high-level politicians to accept their own disarmament and slavery. But it gets worse. As the emails progress, the two tyrants discuss how to create more buzzwords to further manipulate the emotionally weak and shape public opinion to push their dictatorial anti-gun agenda.

Duncan added: “Gun show loophole? Database? Cop-killer bullets? Too complicated?”Emanuel: “Cop killer maybe. The other no,” to which Duncan replied, “Got it.” –Washington Times

The emails were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request submitted last summer to the Education Department, according to the Baltimore Post’s Ann Constantino.
Nicole and Josh Landers, the co-founders of the Parent2Parent Network in Baltimore County, said the email exchange “demonstrates a shocking political conspiracy to draw upon an agenda rather than focus on the murders of 20 school children and 6 educators from Sandy Hook.” Ms. Landers, who participated in last month’s roundtable discussion on school discipline with Betsy DeVos, has decried the 2014 federal guidance’s impact on school safety and the learning environment. “It appears that former Secretary Duncan was and is using the gun control platform to deflect from his failed educational policies which have negatively impacted nearly 51 million students and over 3 million teachers nationwide,” they said in a statement.

Humans have proven to be easily manipulated. There are some in the United States that march around begging for the government to forcibly take away their fundamental human rights. As if that’s not disturbing enough, those same people were brainwashed by the politicians they trusted to accept their fate as a lesser human so the government can grow and exert even more power over them. Unfortunately, there will be leftists who defend these actions unwilling to admit their very opinions were manipulated and decided for them.

It’s no longer a conspiracy theory, but a fact that people are being brainwashed using their emotions against them to accept a totalitarian agenda.

“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” -Often attributed to Mark Twain, yet the original source is unknown for certain.

Nancy Pelosi Can’t Say Enough Bad Things About the Trumps – But Look Where Her Son Was Spotted

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/HX425i
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) spends her days going back and forth between mocking President Trump and having aphasia episodes where she slurs her speech, talks nonsense and forgets what she is saying. Today, she inappropriately went after the President and said that North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is likely having “a giggle fit right now” over President Trump’s letter calling off their planned summit in Singapore next month. It’s not exactly comforting to know that an addled elder Democratic stateswoman finds the prospect of nuclear war funny.

Kim “got global recognition and regard,” Pelosi went on. “He’s the big winner. When he got this letter from the President saying ‘okay, never mind’ — he must be having a giggle fit right there now in North Korea.” Pelosi said that it was clear Trump didn’t know what he was getting into in the negotiations with Pyongyang and mocked the language used in his “very chummy, palsy-walsy letter.”
While Pelosi is bad-mouthing President Trump who has virtually kept all of his campaign promises, you should see who her son was spotted with over New Year’s. It says volumes about the duplicity of someone like Nancy Pelosi. Her son, Paul Pelosi Jr., spent New Year’s Eve at the President’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. He actually shared a couple of photos of himself with Ivanka Trump on Instagram.

It looked like a fantastic party and even Pelosi’s son looked like he was having the time of his life. While his mother is out there smiling in front of the President and then disparaging him behind his back, it would appear that her son is just fine hanging out with the Trump clan at Mar-a-Lago. Funny, huh? The President, his family, and members of his Cabinet all attended the swanky New Year’s Eve party at the Palm Beach property. Since Pelosi’s son was invited it appears that he is a friend of the family. I’ll bet you anything that Nancy sees herself as one too. I highly doubt that President Trump views her that way though.

Paul Pelosi Jr.’s older sister, Christine, said she’s not surprised by her brother’s appearance at the Mar-a-Lago party. “He is just an adventuring guy,” she said. “Maybe he had a golf game.” Or maybe he enjoys the company of Ivanka and the rest of the family. I don’t know whether Pelosi’s son is a member or a guest… it either cost him $600 or $750 just to get in and there wasn’t a golf ball in sight.
It appears that when a good party is afoot, liberal Democrats are as sweet as pie and want to hobnob with the popular kids. But when they get in front of the cameras, their politics turn accusatory.

Pelosi is certainly not alone in going after the President today over doing the right thing with North Korea. Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) tweeted that the Nobel Peace Prize some speculated Trump could receive for helping denuclearize the Korean Peninsula “will have to wait.” I might remind him that President Trump said he did not seek that prize. He was trying to negotiate true peace, but he will never do so if it hurts the US. Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) tweeted that “the art of diplomacy is a lot harder than the art of the deal,” adding he was amazed that the administration was surprised at North Korea’s behavior. They weren’t, Bob. President Trump announced earlier this week that he thought the meeting would not happen. Perhaps you were on a golf course somewhere yourself.

Rep. Brian Schatz (D-HI) tweeted that National Security Adviser John Bolton “must be stoked” and “this is what happens when amateurs are combined with warmongers.” That is an inexcusable remark. Other Democrats expressed concern that the chances of a military confrontation are increasing after today’s action. And so it goes. But I have no doubt that all of them would literally wish to go to a Trump party or have dinner with the man.

Many times what occurs in public for politicians is far different than their private lives. Ivanka Trump and Chelsea Clinton are friends. Nancy Pelosi’s son attends their parties. And I am sure that President Trump is cordial to all of them and some of them are even friendly to him. But it’s vexing to have someone like Nancy Pelosi get up there and mock, insult and deride a sitting President, while her family goes to events with the Trumps. It’s so very Democratic.

Paul Pelosi Jr., son of House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, appears to be quite the nonpartisan partier. He is involved in various business ventures and I’m sure that Paul is his own man. I have no idea what his politics are, but he seemed to be having fun that night. Perhaps his mother could learn a thing or two from her number one son.

Michelle Obama About To Lose It After Trump Rips Her Favorite Freebie From Her Greedy Hands

source: https://goo.gl/9eftYc
The White House has shared some shocking information with the public that might have the Obama family and their supporters a little ticked off after they see the stunning irresponsibility just exposed. Taxpayers especially won’t be happy to read this as this comes directly out of their pockets, one way or another, and they don’t even get to taste the fruit of their labor as the Obama family sucked them dry for $114 million – the amount the Obama’s used for their own personal luxury and campaign funds.

The White House revealed on their website that the Obama family cost taxpayers about $114 million to pay for family vacations and campaigning. Some of the details were revealed and the numbers were quite staggering. One could only imagine spending even a small portion of that on a vacation. Some families struggle to make it to one vacation per year, but sure would love the chance to go on vacations that cost millions!

This numerical disaster might tie into the fact that Congress may go after Barack’s pension. They were somewhat prompted to look into this after he charged $400,000 for a speech, but Obama had done something to put a stop to that. He previously vetoed a bill that would curb the pension of former presidents if they earned $400k or more in income. Sounds sneaky, right? Now that he put that bill on hold while he was in office, he was free to earn more than $400,000 – especially at once, something many might consider a ripoff just to have a single person give a speech. The logic here is that there’s no need to pay someone a six figure pension when they’re already making six figures on their own. Obama blocked that from becoming a reality and now he’s taking advantage of it.

Some political figures would like to rip that pension from the hands of Barack and Michelle, and any other president who finds ways to earn over $400,000 on their own. Do a former president and his wife really need $200,000 pensions if they’re making an extra $400,000 on the side?
USA Today reported: “Last year, then-president Barack Obama vetoed a bill that would have curbed the pensions of former presidents if they took outside income of $400,000 or more.

So now that former president Barack Obama has decided to accept $400,000 for an upcoming Wall Street speech, the sponsors of that bill say they’ll reintroduce that bill in hopes that President Trump will sign it.

The Obama hypocrisy on this issue is revealing,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and sponsor of the 2016 bill. “His veto was very self-serving.”

Chaffetz and Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, the sponsor of the companion Senate bill, say they will re-introduce the Presidential Allowance Modernization Act this month. The bill would cap presidential pensions at $200,000, with another $200,000 for expenses. But those payments would be reduced dollar-for-dollar once their outside income exceeds $400,000.

The issue isn’t a partisan one — or at least, it wasn’t last year. The bill passed both the House and Senate with no opposition, and no veto threat had come from the White House.”

The information from the White House that discloses the amount spent by the Obama on travel and campaigns simply adds insult to injury as people slowly realize that President Trump has been more fiscally responsible. The numbers don’t lie.

As provided from the White House: “Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained records from the U.S. Department of the Air Force and the Secret Service in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and two FOIA lawsuits for travel expenses by the families of former President Barack Obama and President Donald Trump.

The total for Obama travel is $9,028,346.90 for this production of documents. Added to the previously released costs, the known total for travel expenses for the Obamas is now $114,691,322.17.

The total for President Trump’s travels in this production is $2,821,367.34. Added to the previously released costs, the known travel costs are now $10,381,792.35.

Judicial Watch obtained new Obama travel records from the Secret Service as the result of a May 2017 FOIA lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security (No. 1:17-cv-01007)). Judicial Watch’s lawsuit produced the following travel records showing a total of $9,028,346.90 for Obama travel: