CNN’s Cuomo Accidentally Exposes Dems DEEP STATE Plot Against Trump on LIVE TV

CNN’s Cuomo Accidentally Exposes Dems DEEP STATE Plot Against Trump on LIVE TV

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/RUZ1bq
Leave it to CNN to blow their own “liberal” cover, during a LIVE Town Hall featuring Nancy Pelosi.

Town Hall host Chris Cuomo was trying to help his fellow liberal comrade Nancy Pelosi out of a tough situation, when she was cornered by a law student and asked why, after a year, no evidence has been produced proving President Trump colluded with Russians to “steal” the election from most unlikable political candidate ever, Hillary Clinton.
Pelosi tried to wiggle out of the answer, by claiming if Mueller DID find “collusion” we wouldn’t know about it yet…..Never mind that the entire city of D.C. is one GIGANTIC LEAK. Cuomo jumped in to help Nancy, and in the process he gave away the entire DEEP STATE plot against President Trump.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was hit with a direct question right out of the gate at a CNN town hall Wednesday night with the Democrat, being asked where’s the evidence of Russian collusion?

Joshua Gonzalez, a law student at Georgetown University, fired the first question of the night.

“If Trump actually colluded with the Russians, why isn’t he found guilty of it after a year of investigation?” Gonzalez inquired. “Wouldn’t there be some kind of concrete proof by now?”

Ignoring the reality that Washington leaks like a sieve anytime there’s negative news on President Donald Trump, Pelosi claimed we wouldn’t know what Mueller’s probe has produced.

“Well you know there is an investigation going on under counsel [Robert] Mueller,” Pelosi replied. “And that is where — we wouldn’t have any idea what is going on in that, and nor should we know what’s going on in that investigation.”
With Mueller’s investigation having just passed the one-year mark, Pelosi displayed patience in saying the process — to destroy Trump? — needs more time.

“But it takes time, and I trust counsel Mueller and his work,” she told the law student.

CNN host Chris Cuomo chimed in to note a “problem,” that being if Mueller waits too long to release his findings, DOJ guidelines would require him to wait until after the November election — it’s not clear if the liberal host realized he effectively exposed the Democratic Party’s agenda.
“Do you believe that Mueller should put out whatever he has before the election to give voters some sense of where he is?” Cuomo asked Pelosi, setting the stage for what may be an unprecedented move.

Mueller was appointed under a narrow Justice Department regulation for special counsels, Section 600.8(c), which states that he “shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.”

Pelosi looked past this requirement to say, “Well, I think that Mueller should do what he thinks is right.”

But then, this is the party that has a unique attitude about rules, preferring to make them up as they go along.

Trump And Kushner Score Major Victory—And It’s All For America’s Safety

Trump And Kushner Score Major Victory—And It’s All For America’s Safety

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/NoioGQ
One of Donald Trump’s messages during the campaign was “Make America Safe Again.”

He vowed to be the law and order President—unlike his predecessor. Now a new bill passed by the House will go a long way in achieving his goals.

Enforcing our laws and bringing criminals to justice is vital in keeping our society safe. But, all too often, the prison system fails in a big way. Criminals serve their time in prison, only to come out and break the law again. A system originally designed to reform criminals makes them worse.

What can be done to end that cycle? Is there something our leaders can do to both help convicts change their lives and keep our streets safe?

Trump aid and son-in-law Jared Kushner thought so. He championed for reform that will help criminals turn their lives around. Kushner worked with our lawmakers to craft a bill that would transform how our system treats convicts.

And the House overwhelmingly supported it.

From New York Post:

The House by an overwhelming 360-59 vote passed a bipartisan reform bill Tuesday that provides more education for federal prisoners and gives them a second chance after their release.

The bill would also boost current inmates’ chances for a GED, vocational and college courses as well as substance abuse and mental health help, Jeffries told lawmakers on the House floor.

The legislation is a priority for the White House, thanks to the advocacy of Jared Kushner, who saw how his father, Charles, was treated in federal prison. The president’s son-in-law worked closely with the bill’s authors and helped host a prison reform summit at the White House last week with President Trump.

“America is a nation that believes in the power of redemption,” Trump said Friday. “America is a nation that believes in second chances, and third chances, in some cases. And, I don’t know, I guess even fourth chances.”

That vote is significant. The vast majority of our leaders in the House voted for this bill. Both liberals and conservatives. That tells you how effective Kushner can be to bring people together.

After all, Trump doesn’t surround himself with chumps.

But why would this bill be a win for American citizens? The goal is to reform criminals. What good is it to send people to jail, only for them to return to crime afterwards? This bill will go the extra mile in ensuring those criminals who want to change their lives have the opportunity to do so.

That will result in more Americans empowered to live in peace and safety. More Americans working hard to gain a better life. And fewer Americans reliant on the government, one way or another.

The bill must go to the Senate, where it’s fate is currently in question. I can’t imagine any senators opposing it. We’ll have to wait and see.

BREAKING News Out Of China… PRESIDENT TRUMP NEEDS TO TAKE ACTION NOW!!!

BREAKING News Out Of China… PRESIDENT TRUMP NEEDS TO TAKE ACTION NOW!!!

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/pJPSmy
A United States government employee assigned to the American consulate in Guangzhou, China suffered a mild traumatic brain injury similar to those reported by diplomats in Cuba. The unnamed worker reported, “subtle and vague, but abnormal, sensations of sound and pressure.”

The government employee experienced the symptoms from late 2017 until April of 2018,according to the U.S. State Department. “The employee was sent to the United States for further evaluation. On May 18, 2018, the Embassy learned that the clinical findings of this evaluation matched mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI),” Jinnie Lee, U.S. Embassy spokesperson in Beijing, told Gizmodo by email. “The Chinese government has assured us they are also investigating and taking appropriate measures,” Lee continued.

But this isn’t the first time a sound weapon has been used on American diplomats. Cuba has been accused of using a similar device to cause brain trauma in Americans at the embassy in Havana.
It all started in the fall of 2016. Several of the affected diplomats were recent arrivals at the embassy, which reopened in 2015 as part of Barack Obama’s reestablishment of diplomatic relations with Cuba.

The Daily Mail reported that one diplomat described being jolted awake in a Havana hotel room by a grinding, blaring cacophony. When he moved a few feet across the room, the noise stopped. When he got back into bed, the agonizing sound hit him again; as if, he told doctors, he had walked through some invisible wall cutting straight down the middle of his room.

Whether they heard anything or not, the consequences have been unmistakable — symptoms ranging from nosebleeds, nausea, dizziness and severe headaches to mild brain damage and permanent hearing or memory loss. Oddly, as soon as some of the victims left Cuba, they stopped hearing noises. –SHTFPlan

The mysterious illnesses reported by U.S. government employees in Cuba are allegedly thought to be either a “sonic attack” or perhaps malfunctioning surveillance gear. It’s not known yet whether the injured government worker in China was targeted with any such device, despite reporting similar symptoms as the diplomats in Cuba.

The U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou says that it hasn’t had any other reported cases of strange sounds being heard by American officials, but is taking the issue seriously. “If you have concerns about any symptoms or medical problems that developed during or after a stay in China, consult a medical professional,” the State Department said in a public release. “While in China, if you experience any unusual acute auditory or sensory phenomena accompanied by unusual sounds or piercing noises, do not attempt to locate their source. Instead, move to a location where the sounds are not present,” the release said.

The Cuban government continues to deny they attacked U.S. diplomats with a sonic weapon, and very little additional information is known about those who suffered through the strange ordeal. After months of investigations, U.S. officials concluded that the diplomats had been exposed to an advanced device that operated outside the range of audible sound and had been deployed either inside or outside their residences. It was not immediately clear if the device was a weapon used in a deliberate attack, or had some other purpose.

ALERT: The “Big One” Is Coming Fast, AND IT’S NOT JUST IN CALIFORNIA!!!

ALERT: The “Big One” Is Coming Fast, AND IT’S NOT JUST IN CALIFORNIA!!!

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/V1bVCg
A massive earthquake many are calling “the big one” is overdue to strike California, either on along the San Andrea fault line or the Hayward Bay fault line. But this earthquake is still a threat even to those who don’t live in the Golden State.

The second-largest city in the United States, Los Angeles, sits atop 100 geological faults. A big earthquake is an inevitable part of its future and almost everyone is afraid of that massive earthquake dubbed “the big one.” But this earthquake is a threat to many who have chosen to not reside in California.

Ten years ago, while at the U.S. Geological Survey I led a team that created the ShakeOut Scenario, our best scientific estimate of the consequences of a big earthquake on California’s San Andreas fault. We estimated about $50 billion in direct losses from the earthquake itself. The fires triggered by the earthquake would double those losses. The business disruption costs over the next six months caused by disruption to water, power, and transportation doubles the total again to more than $200 billion. –Lucy Jones, MarketWatch
But that $50 billion in losses translates to the national economy as well. More than 40% of the total imports to the United States come in through the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Even if the damage to those port facilities is minimal, the railway lines that carry goods to the rest of the country run across the San Andreas fault, where they will be upended 20 to 30 feet by a big earthquake. No other port on the West Coast has the capacity to pick up more than a fraction of that cargo. Pipelines that carry fuel from the refineries in Los Angeles to supply most of the need in Arizona and Nevada also cross the San Andreas and will be broken. The transport of fuel and train cargo cannot resume until the fires started when those pipes break have been put out and the roads and railway lines can be repaired.

Effects will be felt across the country, not just by those immediately impacted near the fault lines. The true cost of a future California earthquake will only be seen in the years and maybe even decades after the actual event occurs. According to MarketWatch, one could argue that San Francisco never regained the central economic role it had before the 1906 earthquake. That’s the last time an earthquake above magnitude 7.7 hit the state. The cost of the next great earthquake will be seen in the ability of California communities to inspire their residents to stay, to put up with discomfort, inconvenience, and even deprivation to fight for the future of their homes.

Being prepared is the best way to shield yourself from any possible negative effects of a major earthquake in California. Since prepping is a daunting task and it’s often difficult to know where to start, we suggest a book titled The Prepper’s Blueprint. It’s a great resource for those beginning a prepping regimen and for more advanced preppers who may have overlooked the economic impact of a California earthquake.

Meghan Shocked To Learn Harry Called Ex Girlfriend Hours Before Wedding

Meghan Shocked To Learn Harry Called Ex-Girlfriend Hours Before Wedding

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/MdaQ1a
A friend of the royal family has spilled the beans — or, rather, the tea — about a secret phone call Prince Harry made just hours ahead of his wedding to American actress Meghan Markle. The new Duchess of Sussex was shocked to learn what was said during the call between Harry and his ex-girlfriend, Chelsy Davy.

According to Vanity Fair, Prince Harry got in touch with his ex-girlfriend, 32-year-old Chelsy Davy, after discovering that she had received an invite to his wedding ceremony but not the reception at Frogmore House, and the conversation acted as closure for the former couple.

“It was their final call, a parting call in which they both acknowledged Harry was moving on,” said a family friend. “Chelsy was quite emotional about it all, she was in tears and almost didn’t go to the wedding. In the end, she went and promised Harry she wouldn’t try and gatecrash the party.”

The 32-year-old, who dated the prince from 2003 to 2010, attended the ceremony of Meghan Markle’s wedding to Prince Harry on Saturday. She is reported to have arrived with fellow ex-girlfriend Cressida Bonas, with the pair spotted chatting together ahead of the ceremony.

Many social media users were quick to point out the jewelry designer’s more somber face during the service. While many joked that her pensive face screamed ‘it should have been me’, others admitted that they could relate to her. Body language expert Judi James, says that Chelsy’s feelings were evident during the wedding. [Source: Daily Mail]

Prince Harry and Chelsy Davy were together for the better part of seven years, between 2003 and 2010. After first meeting while she was a teenager and then getting together during Harry’s gap year in Cape Town, Zimbabwe-born Chelsy moved to the UK to study in Leeds and be closer to the young royal.

The 32-year-old businesswoman has previously said that she and Harry split as a result of the intense media interest surrounding their relationship, which she called “scary” and “uncomfortable.” When the couple broke up in 2010, she retreated once again to her native Zimbabwe, unable to handle the headlines. However, she was invited to the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s wedding in 2011.
Chelsy went on to establish an enviable career at solicitor’s firm Allen & Overy. In an interview in 2016, she said that she believes that she and Harry “will always be friends.” However, it’s likely that won’t sit well with Meghan, who must be furious that Harry was still calling his ex in the days and hours leading up to the royal wedding.
Those who viewed the ceremony were largely able to identify with Chelsy’s heartbreak at watching another woman marry her prince. After all, Chelsy and Harry were together for much longer than him and Meghan, but the American actress ultimately won his proposal and his hand in marriage.

Many fans of the royal family would have liked to have seen Harry pick Chelsy over Meghan, as Chelsy would have been a far better fit for royal life. For one, she has much better “breeding” than Meghan, whose family created all sorts of drama in the weeks leading up to her wedding. Chelsy also has a good job and “real world” experience which would have made her relatable to the general public. Meghan’s just an out-of-touch Hollywood actress.
Indeed, now that several days have passed since the royal wedding, many have been left wondering if Harry married the wrong girl. No doubt his family would have been relieved had he picked Chelsy over Meghan, if only for the fact that Chelsy’s family surely wouldn’t have embarrassed them the way that Meghan’s did. Chelsy would have been another Kate Middleton, while Meghan is more like the red-headed step-child who never quite fit in. I suppose it’s too late for Harry to change his mind now, though.