Day: May 29, 2018

Just In: Susan Rice’s $50 Million Secret Just Revealed From Obama And It’s A Huge Problem

source: https://goo.gl/M3xWSK
At the end of 2017, former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, that served under President Obama became embroiled in controversy. Rice made headlines in the international news outlets for her intentional “unmasking” of several officials within the campaign of Donald Trump. But what she also made headlines over was for her salary. Rice has a net worth of approximately $50 million dollars yet was only making $172,000 a year.

The Washington Post previously reported on it and alleged that the millions of dollars in net worth came from various inheritances as well as personal investments for Rice and her husband. However, as of five years ago those inheritances equaled $20 million. Meaning that there is an additional $30 million that is unaccounted for that she made during her time in the White House.

During her service, she spent a large part of her time in the administration opposing oil. In 2012, NPR wrote that Rice owned stock in TransCanada. Which was the company responsible for the Keystone XL project that the administration opposed? This means that while the President was deciding whether to oppose it or support it Rice had a vested financial interest in it.

CDP reported,
“According to the NPR article, she owns stock valued at somewhere between $300,000 and $600,000 in TransCanada. Furthermore, they state, “… about a third of Rice’s personal net worth is tied up in oil producers, pipeline operators, and related energy industries north of the 49th parallel — including companies with poor environmental and safety records on both U.S. and Canadian soil.”

Remember how the Obama administration was pushing for “clean energy?” Apparently, that means only to United States citizens, and not the people that are supposed to govern them.

The Post does try to say that there is nothing shady about Rice’s dealings with the oil industry. They say that the connections “go back 20 years” when she was working somewhere else. However, the stunning hypocrisy is real among Democratic voters, who are clamoring about climate change, yet never mention a word about what Rice was involved in.

It also represents a huge conflict of interest. Rice’s wealth has essentially doubled since 2012. How many other things was she investing in while being an adviser to the Obama administration? It’s easy to think that her wealth had increased due to the fact she was advising Obama on certain issues.

It was clear that Rice was set to be somewhat of a human shield for Obama’s failures, starting with the Benghazi incident. Those eventually rose until the “unmasking” scandal came to light. It was so bad that Judge Andrew Napolitano, often dubbed “America’s Judge,” was calling for Rice to be arrested and jailed.

Rice was also brought up during the Syrian strike that President Trump did back in April. The strike was about the gassing that had been going on. That brought up a conflicting narrative, as Rice stated in January that claimed the gas had been removed from Syria. The conflicting reports left two solutions, and neither proved well for Rice. A life in the public sector pays very well, but it doesn’t make people extremely wealthy. Rice’s net worth has to be called into question, especially if Trump wants to continue to “drain the swamp” of the people that are there. Her career was filled with scandals, but this is just adding more fuel to the fire.”

The American government is not a playpen for the rich and wealthy. It is not an opportunity to become rich and make money. As many have said before if you leave public service richer than you were before than you are not doing it correctly. Because that is not meant to be the purpose of public service it is meant to be service for the betterment of the American people. Anyone who takes advantage of that should be ashamed of themselves because there is no honor is taking advantage of the American people.

This is symbolic of what the Obama administration represents. Corruption, conflicts of interest, and power struggles. While the Democratic party has pointed the fingers at Republicans for their “tax cuts for the rich” and for “selling out to corporate interests” in reality, they are no better and are exactly the same. The only difference is that they pretend to be different in the media and in front of everybody else. Because the truth is is that they socialize with Hollywood predators like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby while preaching equality and justice and there is no honor in any of that.

Share if you agree

Share if you believe that the American people deserve better

Share if you think that Susan Rice should be punished for what she did and her money taken from her

Share if you agree that public service should not be about becoming rich but about serving the American people

FOLLOW us on Facebook at Right Wing News!

Obama Blindsided By Huge Investigation Into Who He Gave $48 MILLION To Hours Before Exiting White House

source: https://goo.gl/itLn2Q
Corruption until his very last day in office!

According to two sources and State Department grant records, in the final days of the Barack Hussein Obama administration, a $48 million State Department grant to a for-profit company for IED and other bomb removal services in Syria was rushed for approval. This grant has received scrutiny just a few weeks into Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s tenure.

This type of bombing and ordnance removal is considered extremely dangerous work but critically important for the safety of returning communities which were displaced by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Since these terrorist organizations tend to leave IED booby traps intended to maim or k**l returning families or government workers.

Late in the summer of 2016, a joint effort by foreign non-governmental organizations, NGOs, from Western Europe, local Iraqi groups, and Janus Global Operations, worked under State Department funding to clear bombs in Iraq. Janus, a for-profit company which is coined to be the largest munitions management and demining company in the world. And it present time the only American company which specializes in this type of work. In 2016 alone they cleared thousands of explosives planted by ISIS in Ramadi.
Then comes Optima which is a British company that calls itself the “leaders in explosive threat mitigation.” In mid-2016 Optima was surveying an area in Fallujah littered with IEDs and planning a major clearing operation.

Now here is where things get interesting. Despite the expertise and experience of these two companies and others operating in the region, in the final days of December 2016, as the Obama regime was coming to a end, state department officials in the Office of Near East Asia, Office of Assistance Coordination facilitated funding for a non-competitive grant to Tetra Tech.

Tetra Tech is an engineering company which specializes in construction management and has vastly limited experience in munitions and ordnance clearance than Janus, Optima, or NGOs such as HALO Trust, FSD/Crosstech, Mechem, and others. And this is the first time Tetra Tech has worked with The State Department’s PMWRA office. Needless to say all this has raised a few eyebrows.

Could this be another one of the Obama Regime’s kickbacks? We will just have to wait and see.
Here is more on this via The Free Beacon:

“According to the website USAspending.gov, the State Department’s PMWRA Office provided the grant money for “Syrian Conventional Weapons Destruction” with the funds doled out in tranches for work performed over the course of two years and two months.

The first award of $8 million was provided Dec. 29, 2016, with another $8 million coming March 29, 2017. The State Department doled out another $30 million May 5, 2017, and provided the final $2.4 million Sept. 21, 2017.

While the publicly available grant award information is currently listed for $48 million, it was eventually worth more than $150 million as Germany and other countries directed funds to Tetra Tech for Syria’s IED clean-up efforts, sources said.

A Defense One report in August 2016 noted that the State Department had just secured $86 million from 26 countries for demining efforts over the next three years.

The awarding of a “no-bid” grant, instead of allowing several companies to compete for a government contract through the paper-intensive and time-consuming government bidding process, raised immediate questions about the project’s selection process in the government contracting community, the sources said.

Patrick Kernan, a government contracting attorney who previously served as the chief of contract fiscal law for the Multinational Force in Iraq as a U.S. Army Judge Advocate General, said a U.S. government agency providing a grant to a large, for-profit company is unusual and raises legal red flags.

Whether it broke any laws or State Department procedures and rules, he said, would depend on internal paperwork and whether the officials involved precisely followed all the agency’s grant rules.

“[It] sounds like a way to circumvent the strict sole-source contracting rules by pushing money into a grant process,” which provides far less oversight than the regular contracts, he said in an email. “It sounds like a pretty broad problem that needs some legislation to fix.

Photo Goes Viral As Liberals Rage And Blame Trump For It, Except It Was Obama Who Did It

source: https://goo.gl/UeDZ7v
The left never ceases to take advantage of the opportunity to portray Republicans in a negative light. Especially when it comes to immigration issues. Despite Congressional and Senate Republicans being willing to work with them and compromise. Instead, false articles regarding “caged migrant children” are circulating on the internet. While people are assuming this happened recently it really happened several years ago under the Obama administration.

Zero Hedge reported,

“A photograph of two migrant children sleeping in a cage at an ICE detention facility quickly went viral on Sunday after several prominent liberals tweeted it in a white-hot rage at President Trump’s immigration policy.

After a laundry list of journalists and public figures angrily tweeted the photo – including CNN’s Hadas Gold, NYT Mag’s editor-in-chief Jake Silverstein, Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau and former LA mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, they deleted their tweets in shame when it emerged that the photo was taken in 2014, under Obama. Indeed – nobody thought to check the date on the attached article, published in June of 2014.

The award for the lamest excuse goes to CNN’s Hadas Gold, who wrote “Deleted previous tweet because gave impression of recent photos (they’re from 2014).” Jake Silverstein, editor-in-chief of NYT Magazine, threw his family under the bus for “distracting” him.

Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau cranked up the virtue-signaling up to eleven, tweeting “Look at these pictures. This is happening right now, and the only debate that matters is how we force our government to get these kids back to their families as fast as humanly possible.”
The photos themselves were actually part of an article that was published by The Arizona Republic. It focused on migrant children who came to the country illegally because they were brought by their parents. They were later arrested by United States Customs and Border Protection agents and were sent to Nogales processing facility in Texas.

The Independent reported,

“Donald Trump has lashed out after old photos of immigrant children in steel cages that were taken while Barack Obama was in the White House were linked to the current administration. The US president launched a scathing attack on journalists and Democrat voters who shared the old photos on Twitter in order to highlight the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigrants.

“Democrats mistakenly tweet 2014 pictures from Obama’s term showing children from the Border in steel cages,” Mr Trump tweeted on Tuesday. “They thought it was recent pictures in order to make us look bad, but backfires. Dems must agree to Wall and new Border Protection for good of country…Bipartisan Bill!”

The old images gained increasing traction on Twitter – with critics monopolizing on them to express outrage at the Trump White House. But the images being shared are four years old and were of detainees in a holding cell where hundreds of mostly Central American immigrant children were being processed and held at the US Customs and Border Protection Nogales Placement Center on 18 June 2014 in Nogales in Arizona. Local news site AZ Central alerted people to the fact they had published the initial photos which were being falsely connected to the Trump administration.

The outrage over the old images was partly spurred by the unrelated revelation Homeland Security “lost track of” almost 1,500 illegal-immigrant minors after they were released. The acting assistant secretary for Children and Families at the Department of Health And Human Services, Steven Wagner, addressed the whereabouts of immigrant children during his testimony before the Senate last week – stating the department was “unable to determine” where some 1,500 immigrant may be located.

The misplaced fury over the photos also comes after the Trump administration’s controversial new policy of taking children away from parents caught unlawfully crossing into America with them on the southern border. The White House has said the practice is a deterrent to illegal immigration. US Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a “zero tolerance” approach to illegal border crossings earlier in May. “If you are smuggling a child then we will prosecute you, and that child will be separated from you as required by law,” he warned.”

Creepy Hillary Showed Up At Memorial Day Parade Dressed For Blizzard, Horrified People Made Her Regret It

source: https://goo.gl/CvG8Wc
For a couple of weeks I have been seeing Hillary Clinton in coats and scarves, which is very weird considering it’s hot out most places. One wonders exactly what is under that coat she is wearing. There are rumors of a back brace, but it is hard to tell. Something isn’t right… but then it never is with Hillary Clinton. The Clintons are corrupt grifters and are always up to something. That’s just who they are.

Hillary and Bill Clinton and Gov. Andrew Cuomo marched in Monday’s town Memorial Day parade. It’s a local parade for the Clintons, which makes this even stranger. At one point, Bill Clinton looks confused and has to be steered back on course after the parade. Hillary gets winded and can’t keep up. Neither of these people has the health and vigor of President Trump and it shows big time. When you show up for a Memorial Day parade dressed for a blizzard, people automatically wonder what is wrong and it shows all over their faces. I’m sure that the Clintons regretted the outing afterward. It was embarrassing on numerous fronts.

Hillary and Bill walked in the New Castle/Chappaqua parade again this year. They do this every year, but this year was just weird. It’s a tradition that has kept her in the media spotlight for several years, even after her failed run for president. This time, it didn’t go as planned and showed how weak both of them are. Just sad. Wonder how she’ll dress this summer.Hillary gave an interview after the parade and it was evident she was out of breath. She had obviously prepared and scripted what she would say. Her rhetoric involved Benjamin Franklin and was, well… just odd. “Every year, we should remember,” she said, mispronouncing the word, “that we’ve got work to do to keep that republic,” talking about America. That doesn’t even really make sense.

Hillary walked off and left Bill as he talked with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. That was when Bill wandered off confused about where he was supposed to go. He had that signature mouth-open and dazed look he usually sports in public. It’s like he’s not all there anymore. Alzheimer’s comes to mind, or Parkinson’s. The same afflictions you could attribute to Hillary, if you were so inclined.

Cuomo just left, leaving Bill to wander aimlessly, while shaking hands and looking confused. Nice. So much for taking care of your own.
But it is Hillary and her mysterious heavy coat and scarf that is causing tongues to wag. According to Heavy.com, people are wondering if Hillary Clinton has a back injury or a back brace. That’s what some people are theorizing after Clinton was repeatedly photographed with a mysterious rectangular-shaped bulge protruding under her jacket. It hasn’t been proven though and the strange bulge that periodically appears has been attributed to everything from a wireless microphone to the bulkiness of her jackets. She had that same bulge in Boston and at a forum recently as well.

Photos taken on Memorial Day 2018 didn’t put to rest the speculation. The strange bulge appears to possibly be visible again under Clinton’s coat and she appeared a little too bundled up for a day in late May. Make that a lot bundled up. Clinton posted a photo of herself on Memorial Day in a light blue jacket that raised questions again about her back and a bulge on it. “Just returned from marching in the annual Chappaqua Memorial Day Parade with everyone from Governors to Girls Scouts. Today we honor those who have made the ultimate sacrifice for their country to keep us safe here at home,” the tweet says. However, photos from other angles showed the back bulge in a more pronounced fashion. There are other photos from behind that also show that mysterious bulge.

I’ve also noticed, especially at the forum where Clinton was sitting down or when she speaks at a podium, she looks oddly stiff. Hillary did not use to make use of a scarf the way she does now either. It’s intriguing. Clinton has been photographed recently wearing large scarves. Although she has always had a penchant for the scarf-over-coat look, she has been wearing particularly large scarves that seem strategically positioned over her shoulders and upper back. At first, I thought it was to hide her neck. As people get older, their necks get looser. But that does not explain the bulky coat with a bulge in the back. This is a very recent development.
Hillary’s health has always been a valid topic. I personally don’t think she is physically capable of being Commander-in-Chief the way President Trump is. Then there’s the whole relief that this corrupt, vile woman will never be president. We dodged a bullet on that one. It may not have been a challenging set of stairs, but walking in the New Castle, New York Memorial Day parade was no easy task for Hillary Clinton, either.