Day: May 29, 2018

Roseanne’s Show In Jeopardy After Twitter Mob Attacks Her As ‘Racist’

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/1PVPz8
President Donald Trump supporter Roseanne Barr triggered liberals in a major way. The reboot of her hit show “Roseanne,” where her character plays a supporter of the president, has triggered them before, but what she said about a former Barack Obama adviser sent them over the edge.

Roseanne Barr was commenting on a tweet that stated Wikileaks founder Julian Assange said that the Obama administration had spied on not only President Trump but French presidential candidates too.

One of the commenters wrote a response that caught Barr’s attention. “Jarrett helped hide a lot,” referencing former advisor to President Obama, Valerie Jarret.
Barr got right on that with a now-deleted tweet that some called racist. “muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj,” she wrote.
When another person called her tweet out as “racist,” Barr struck back. “Muslims r NOT a race,” she wrote.

“ISLAM is not a RACE, lefties. Islam includes EVERY RACE of people,” she wrote in another tweet. And it was not the first time this week that she triggered the left on Twitter.

The first time she triggered them was when she, incorrectly, stated that former first daughter Chelsea Clinton was married to a nephew of billionaire progressive George Soros. “Chelsea Soros Clinton,” she wrote in the first tweet followed by another that read “she’s married to soros nephew,” in a tweet she deleted. She added, “soros’ goal; the overthrow of us constitutional republic by buying/backing candidates 4 local district attorney races who will ignore US law & favor ‘feelings’ instead-and call everyone who is alarmed by that ‘racist’.”

“as soon as americans unite against disinfo mkultra classist narrative, the better we will all b,” she said in another tweet, referencing the old CIA mind control operation from the 1970s.

Chelsea Clinton quickly fired back and defended herself and Soros. “Good morning Roseanne – my given middle name is Victoria. I imagine George Soros’s nephews are lovely people. I’m just not married to one. I am grateful for the important work @OpenSociety does in the world. Have a great day!” she wrote.

“I’m sorry-Chelsea Clinton IS NOT married to a nephew of George Soros-i apologize for the mistake!! #Sorry,” Barr wrote in one tweet explaining that she had made a mistake. “CORRECTION: CHELSEA CLINTON IS NOT MARRIED TO A SOROS NEPHEW. HER HUSBAND IS THE SON OF A CORRUPT SENATOR, SO SORRY!” she said in another, with a link to a Snopes story debunking the rumor.

But it was Barr’s comment about Jarret that drew the most attention. Progressives came out of the woodwork to attack the sitcom star, who is one of their favorite new enemies. Many of them called out the ABC Network in an attempt to get Roseanne’s show canceled.

“Hi @ABCNetwork, if you’re going to continue to air @RoseanneOnABC, maybe you should tell @therealroseanne to quit calling Black people monkeys. Just a free idea from me to you,” legal analyst Imani Gandy wrote.
“if i may: perhaps a more important story with Roseanne isn’t what she’s saying, because this is what she’s done for awhile….it’s about ABC’s silence on this,” New York Times writer Sopan Deb wrote.

“Here’s a vile, unstable celebrity that Trump has personally championed, @therealroseanne, calling Valerie Jarett—a black former senior adviser to America’s first black president—the offspring of monkeys. Are you okay with this @ABC? Are the advertisers for her show?” Washington Post reporter Brian Klaas wrote.

The attacks got the best of Barr who apologized and said she would quit Twitter. “I apologize. I am now leaving Twitter,” she wrote. “I apologize to Valerie Jarrett and to all Americans. I am truly sorry for making a bad joke about her politics and her looks. I should have known better. Forgive me-my joke was in bad taste,” she said.
It is a shame that the speech sensors on Twitter got to Roseanne Barr. Her comment was in poor taste, but it was not directed at Jarrett’s race. Any implication that it was is just an example of the speech police attempting to use what she said to silence her. The question is how long will it be successful?

BOMBSHELL REPORT: ‘Trump Jr Russia Meeting’ Was a CLINTON Deep State Set Up

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/kXvW5j
By now we all realize that this entire Russia sham is one gigantic Deep State set up, right?

If you don’t know by now, you’re learning it everyday, as more and more evidence comes out that shows how Obama’s Deep State plotted, schemed and spied in order to set up a “Russia collusion” fairy tale, to pin on President Trump in order to take him down.
Case in point, the meeting Don Trump Jr. had with a Russian lawyer inside Trump Tower is now being outed as another “set up” after the lobbyist at the meeting just admitted he has a personal relationship with the Clintons and their staffers.

NEW YORK — In recently released testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, a key participant at the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with President Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr. said that he “knows” Hillary Clinton and has a personal relationship with her that dates back to the late-1990s.

Besides describing a direct connection to Clinton, Russian-born Washington lobbyist Rinat Akhmetshin also testified that he “knew some people who worked on” Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Akhmetshin was one of the participants at the June 9, 2016 Trump Tower meeting that has been the subject of much news media coverage related to unsubstantiated and collapsing claims of collusion with Russia. All meeting participants generally agree the confab focused largely on the Magnitsky Act, which sanctions Russian officials accused of involvement in the death of a Russian tax accountant, as well as talk about a Russian tax evasion scheme and alleged connections to the Democratic National Committee.

Trump Jr. previously explained that he took the meeting thinking it was about “opposition research” on Hillary Clinton and was disappointed that it wasn’t.

Last week, Breitbart News reported that email transcripts and other information disclosed in Akhmetshi’s testimony reveal a significant relationship between the lobbyist and the controversial Fusion GPS firm that produced the infamous, largely discredited anti-Trump dossier.

The Russia collusion conspiracy was sparked by the dossier produced by Fusion GPS, which was paid for its anti-Trump work by Trump’s primary political opponents, namely Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) via the Perkins Coie law firm.

Now it has emerged that in his testimony, Akhmetshin related a personal connection to Clinton via attorney Ed Lieberman, whose late wife Evelyn previously served as Clinton’s chief of staff when she was First Lady. Evelyn Lieberman also served as Bill Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, and famously transferred Monica Lewinsky out of the White House to the Defense Department.

Akhmetshin said that he first met Ed Lieberman in the fall of 1998, when Lieberman “was attorney for my first employer here in” Washington, DC.
The New York Times previously reported that Lieberman in 1998 arranged for Akhmitshi’s position at “an organization pushing what he described as a pro-democracy agenda for Kazakhstan.” Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh says he met Akhmetshin through Lieberman.

In his testimony, Akhmetshin described taking an Acela train to New York the day of the June 9, 2016 Trump Tower meeting, and says that Lieberman “may” have been with him.

He says that in the following exchange:

A. I have taken morning Acela train to New York on June 9th.

Q. On June 9th? Did you travel with anyone?

A. I might have been there with Lieberman or I might be traveling alone.

Akhmetshin says his dealings with Lieberman in New York that day were “personal” and centered on a scholarship program that he claims Lieberman started. “And he was in New York that day to discuss arrangements with Metropolitan Museum with kind of taking care of that scholarship award,” Akhmetshi stated.

Akhmetshin says that while he was in New York, he had lunch with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who countered the Magnitsky Act along with Akhmetshi. There, Veselnitskaya told him about the scheduled meeting that day at Trump Tower, but she didn’t say anything about him attending.

He claims that after he had lunch with Veselnitskaya, she called him and asked him to attend the Trump Tower meeting, but she didn’t suggest any role he would play at the meeting or why he should attend.

‘SUICIDE’ FBI Agents Are TERRIFIED to Testify Against Comey and McCabe

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/2vwjS9
Sources say that disgruntled FBI agents scared to death to speak out against Comey and McCabe and the disgraced bureau.

According to reports, agents don’t trust Congress to protect them under current laws and claim whistleblower protection is ineffective against FBI retaliation.
Sources say FBI never punishes anyone who retaliates against whistleblowers.

Even as a new Rasmussen poll shows a majority of voters believe senior law enforcement officials broke the law to stop Donald Trump from beating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election, rank-and-file FBI agents who want to testify against their superiors to Congress feel they can’t due to an ineffective whistleblower protection law.

These agents believe the sluggishness of the law exposes them to an inordinate risk of reprisal, so they have remained in hiding and afraid to speak the truth.

This story is based on interview transcripts with two FBI agents that one former White House official provided The Daily Caller. A third special agent also reached out to The Daily Caller to provide information about the current state of the Bureau.

The former White House official who maintained direct contact with at least two agents told TheDC they are “hunkering down because they see good people being thrown to the dogs for speaking out and speaking out does nothing to solve the problems.” He believes that “Congress and DOJ are so weak and clueless and can’t be trusted to follow through.”

According to transcripts he shared with TheDC, one special agent said, “It’s a question of basic credibility — Congress, the executive, and oversight are not seen to have any gravitas or seriousness. The inmates have been running the asylum and they don’t respect, much less fear, their overseers. We know we’ll be hung out to dry.”

The agent added, “And don’t get me wrong, there are still a few good people scattered about, but main Justice and the bureaucrats are running the show, want to run out the clock on this administration, and keep the status quo.”

Another special agent, when asked about being subpoenaed, said, “This is a great opportunity for senior or [soon to be retiring] guys, not for someone like me. It’d be suicide. I hate to say it, but neither the judiciary nor the executive branch is wielding any kind of effective oversight right now, and the top managers know it.”

He continued, “You still have a ton of bad people in place. Unless that changes, and I haven’t seen any degree of seriousness on the part of ranking members nor staffers, I’m not meeting with anyone nor willing to be subpoenaed. I’m not coming forward until they get their act together. Right now, it’d be sacrificing a career for cheap political points.”
TheDC has learned that the bureau has already warned agents that the agency will come back viciously against all those “behind destroying their narrative, and will go after their families and friends, too.”

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley defended the Whistleblower Protection Act he spearheaded after FBI agents insisted that only subpoenas would bring them forward to Congress.

“I’ve worked hard to strengthen legal protections, especially for FBI employees. You have a right to cooperate with Congressional inquiries, just as you have a right to cooperate with the Inspector General. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying.”

Sen. Grassley’s law does an appropriate job at protecting whistleblowers from unfair prosecution, but it is not prosecution that prevents agents from stepping forward—it is the possibility of going bankrupt from attorneys’ fees when defending themselves against retaliatory legal actions by their agency.

For example, an FBI agent who came forward as a government whistleblower in 2013 told TheDC he experienced “personal humiliation, stress-related illnesses, and a huge financial loss, requiring my wife (who had undergone two cancer surgeries) to go to work so we could make ends meet.”

However, despite the whistleblower protection law, it seems the agency’s retaliation will likely not be investigated as the process is, as one agent put it to TheDC over email, “slow by design and at the end of the process they will never be held accountable.”

That agent went on to say, “Even with the enactment of the new law, what is the deterrent for retaliation against Whistleblowers? The FBI executives will just stall, ignore, and run out the clock until the victim runs out of money for legal fees or else retires.”

He added, “That is why the new Whistleblowers want to be subpoenaed. They simply don’t have the resources to fight the inevitable retaliation that will ensue, regardless of the new law.”

REPORT: Here’s How The Obama’s Are RAKING IN Cash Post-Presidency

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/SfyCNL
The Obama’s are seriously raking in the cash post-presidency, which is a good thing considering they don’t have the luxury of using our taxpayer dollars for their lavish vacations.

Not only have they exploited their status by signing a lucrative Netflix deal and charging a whopping $400k per speech, but now both Barack and Michelle have signed a joint book deal valued at over $65 million.
It’s good to be the post-president. You still get all the acclaim and the armed security and lots of chances to use and abuse a version of the bully pulpit — but you also get to make a whole lot more than $400,000 a year.

According to insiders, the Obamas are cashing in on the presidency in a way that may be outpacing even the Clintons. Along with speaking fees of around $400,000 a gig, the Obamas just reportedly nailed down a massive contract with Netflix to go along with their even larger book contract.

In its report on how the Obamas were able to secure their big deal with Netflix — through a former campaign donation bundler to whom Obama gave the U.S. ambassadorship in the Bahamas from 2009 to 2011 — the New York Post highlights some of the eye-popping numbers.

The Netflix deal, an entertainment industry insider told the Post, could be valued at $50 million. How much of that money will end up directly in the pockets of the Obamas is unclear, but the company the couple formed to broker the deal, Higher Ground Productions LLC, will surely not have a cash flow problem anytime soon.

And the huge Netflix contract isn’t the biggest deal the Obamas have landed: They’ve also reportedly signed a joint book deal with Penguin Random House valued at over $65 million. Michelle’s memoir, the first book planned in the series, is supposed to be released in November.

In its initial report on the Netflix deal, the Post stated that Obama said that the purpose of the series will be to “promote greater empathy and understanding between peoples and help them share their stories with the entire world.”

Obama 2012 campaign supporter Ted Sarandos, the creative-content chief of Netflix, helped secure the deal, an entertainment industry source told the Post. Sarandos and his wife, Nicole Avant, daughter of another major Obama donor, Clarence Avant, helped bundle $600,000 in contributions for Obama in 2012.​