After Trump Pardoned Him, D’Souza Wasted No Time Selling Out Obama With Shocking Claim

After Trump Pardoned Him, D’Souza Wasted No Time Selling Out Obama With Shocking Claim

source: https://goo.gl/vSswpk
President Donald Trump pardoned conservative filmmaker and author Dinesh D’Souza, sparking controversy among his critics. If you can recall D’Souza is the man behind movies like “2016: Obama’s America.” In the wake of the pardon, D’Souza wasted no time before coming forward with a shocking claim about former President Barack Obama. It’s a claim that has many eyes and ears on high alert as they dig into the mystery of his claim.

When Barack Obama was in office, D’Souza was prosecuted for using a “straw donor” to make campaign contributions on his behalf which exceeded the established limitations for an individual. Although donors rarely face charges for such violations, especially left wind donors, the investigation into D’Souza’s actions were widely seen as a political witch hunt. But sadly he was forced to plead guilty in federal court back in 2014.

Who can blame D’Souza for feeling the way he felt in America. Former President Barack Obama turned him into a political prisoner for not agreeing with his political views. Just like in Communist Cuba, but with the help of the American justice system.
Compare this to what happened to Rosie O’Donnell for doing the exact same thing via The New York Post:

“Rosie O’Donnell made illegally over-sized campaign donations to at least five Democratic federal candidates, according to a Post analysis of campaign filings.

The liberal comedian has regularly broken Federal Election Commission rules limiting the total any one person can give to an individual candidate at $2,700 per election. The limit applies separately to primaries, runoffs and general elections.

“Nothing nefarious,” the outspoken star and Donald Trump arch-nemesis wrote in an email to the Post. “I was not choosing to over donate.

“If 2700 is the cut off — [candidates] should refund the money,” she wrote. “I don’t look to see who I can donate most to … I just donate assuming they do not accept what is over the limit.”
O’Donnell said she donates often, and uses the online liberal fundraising platform ActBlue. “My anxiety is quelled by donating to those opposing trump [and] his agenda — especially at night — when most of these were placed.”

Alabama Sen. Doug Jones disclosed $4,700 from O’Donnell in his special general election bid last year against former GOP judge and accused child molester Roy Moore, his campaign filings show. Jones’ office didn’t return messages seeking comment.

Pennsylvania Rep. Conor Lamb reported $3,600 from O’Donnell for the special general election he won in a March upset, his filings show. He’s now running for a full two-year term in a different congressional district in November, and O’Donnell put up another $1,000 for that bid.

Lamb’s campaign manager said they will notify O’Donnell of her error and inform her that the extra $900 can be refunded or put toward the primary.

Filings show O’Donnell gave a combined $5,400 in contributions over the limit to the five candidates, and used five different New York addresses and four variations of her name.

O’Donnell donated $2,950 to California Rep. Adam Schiff, a 17-year veteran of the House, for his primary, according to his campaign filings. His campaign didn’t return messages seeking comment.

Lauren Underwood, an Illinois congressional candidate, reported $4,200 from O’Donnell for her primary, filings show. Her campaign didn’t return a message.

And Omar Vaid, a little-known congressional candidate in Staten Island and Brooklyn, reported $3,450 in primary donations from O’Donnell, filings show. Vaid’s finance director said the campaign “inadvertently designated” some of the money to the “wrong election” and would amend its filings.
Asked how much she gave to Vaid, O’Donnell wrote, “I have no idea.”

She said she assumed ActBlue “limits donations to the max allowed.”

She added, “I keep donating” and that her brother Tim handles her money.

She gave more than $90,000 the 2017-2018 election cycle to 50 different federal candidates and committees, filings show.

Both donors and candidates are legally liable for contributions over the limit. But it’s unlikely O’Donnell or her benefactors will be penalized for breaking FEC rules. Contributions over the limit can be refunded or counted toward a different election, and married donors can attribute the money to a spouse

Roseanne Just Got Last Laugh On ABC Days After Network Wrongfully Cancelled Her Huge Show

Roseanne Just Got Last Laugh On ABC Days After Network Wrongfully Cancelled Her Huge Show

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/aKY5xi
It has been a very bad week for Roseanne as she lost her show over a controversial Tweet. However, not all is bad news, in fact, this is about as good as it gets. Unless you have been hiding under a rock this whole week you have probably already heard about the mess Roseanne Barr caused by tweeting out a joke in bad taste about Barack Obama’s former advisor and friend Valerie Jarrett.

Of course, because “Roseanne” was a show which doesn’t constantly attack those who voted for and support President Donald Trump, the show was canceled within a few hours after the tweet was sent although Roseanne had already apologized for it. But the great news here is that it is reporting this whole mess could cause ABC to lose an expected $60 million in advertising dollars, plus the pay of 13 episodes to most of the cast, which means they will be paying between $350,00 to $500,000 per episode since they were already under contract.

Since ABC is linked to Disney they thrive on pushing the agenda forward and this has to stop. My guess is they just used this opportunity to get rid of Roseanne because just like Samantha Bee, who called Ivanka Trump a “C***” on her show, and apologized for it so she wouldn’t be fired, so did Roseanne.
The Washington Times wrote this about the projected loss of ad revenue:

“The abrupt cancellation of ‘Roseanne’ will not come cheap,” said Lacey Rose, television editor for The Hollywood Reporter.

“Although the decision was widely viewed as necessary given the racist nature of star Roseanne Barr’s social media attack on senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, several sources with knowledge of the situation suggest that ABC and parent company Disney could be on the hook for tens of millions of dollars,” Rose reported.

“And that doesn’t include the foregone ad revenue,” she said, citing an industry report from Kantar Media that said that the revival of the 1990s-era sitcom was expected to drive $60 million in advertising dollars.
“The ‘Roseanne’ aftermath: who gets paid?” Ms. Rose summarized.

She also said that her sources reveal that ABC producers won’t be able to invoke the “force majeure clause,” which allows them to cancel contracts due to unforeseen, catastrophic events.
“ABC brass will have to make some tough choices about whether and how to compensate the cast and crew for the scrapped 13 episodes,” Ms. Rose said, adding that the major stars of the canceled show were to be paid between $350,000 and $500,000 per episode.”

Hollywood Reporter provided information about who might be getting paid for the scrapped season considering they may have been under contract.

“Stars Sara Gilbert, Laurie Metcalf and John Goodman expect to be paid for the scrapped season, while what, if anything, the writers will receive remains less clear.

The abrupt cancellation of Roseanne will not come cheap. Although the decision was widely viewed as necessary given the racist nature of star Roseanne Barr’s social media attack on Valerie Jarrett, the former senior adviser to Barack Obama, several sources with knowledge of the situation suggest that ABC and parent company Disney could be on the hook for “tens of millions of dollars.” And that doesn’t include the forgone ad revenue, as broadcast’s No. 1 show was expected to drive at least $60 million in its 11th season, according to Kantar Media. Insiders, meanwhile, denied the “tens of millions of dollars” sum and pegged it at significantly less. ABC declined comment.”

According to those same sources, no conversations were had Tuesday about how all of this will play out since all involved were still in a state of shock. ABC’s top television executives, Ben Sherwood and Channing Dungey, are expected to engage as early as Wednesday with representatives for Tom Werner, whose Carsey-Werner production company produced the original run as well as the revival, on the subject of compensation for the cast and crew. Werner is repped by UTA, which also represents several writers, including showrunner Bruce Helford, on the series.

Per multiple insiders, reps for the stars, including Sara Gilbert, Laurie Metcalf and John Goodman, who recently negotiated new deals for the 11th season at $300,000 an episode (up from $250,000 a year before), are expecting to still be compensated for at least 10 episodes of the season since, as many note, “Their options were exercised.” Or at least that’s the case they intend to make if ABC opts not to pay them for the jettisoned season. “They’ll lawyer up if they have to,” says a source with ties to the show.

Pelosi Desperately Tries to Convince Americans That Trump’s AMAZING Jobs Report SUCKS

Pelosi Desperately Tries to Convince Americans That Trump’s AMAZING Jobs Report SUCKS

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/8EzzDY
Democrats are in big, big trouble.

Poll after poll shows Dems 2018 “blue wave” is looking like more of a “ripple.”
So, when the amazing May Jobs Report came out, you can bet chaos and panic ensued.

It is funny watching Democrats campaign against a good economy, especially after watching them campaign for a bad economy for 8 years.

But that’s exactly what they’re doing.

Instead of being HAPPY for the American people, who are finally receiving all that “hope and change” they were promised, Democrats are trying to convince YOU that an excellent jobs report, actually sucks.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi doesn’t think Friday’s stellar jobs report is a good thing, because it happened under Republican control of the White House and Congress.

“May’s jobs report shows that strong employment numbers mean little to the families hit with soaring new costs under the Republicans’ watch,” Pelosi wrote in a statement to supporters Friday.

Friday’s jobs report showed the U.S. gained 223,000 new non-farm employment jobs in April and saw a drop in key unemployment figures.

Pelosi wants voters to focus on the Republicans’ campaign to repeal Obamacare and tax cuts. She doesn’t want voters to think the tax bill was a net-positive, which is in-line with her “crumbs” comment following the bill’s passage.

“Republicans’ cruel, cynical health care sabotage campaign is already spiking families’ premiums by double digits and pushing millions off their coverage, according to the nonpartisan CBO. Big Pharma continues to hoard the benefits of the GOP tax scam, using their handouts to further enrich executives and shareholders instead of lowering prescription drug costs for seniors and sick kids,” Pelosi wrote.
“Democrats know that the American people deserve A Better Deal, with Better Jobs, Better Wages and a Better Future. We are committed to creating millions of new good-paying jobs and raising wages, lowering the soaring cost of living for families and giving every American the tools to succeed in the 21st Century economy,” Pelosi wrote. “Democrats will never stop fighting for the hard-working middle class families who are the backbone of our nation.”

Trump and Republican leadership in Congress were able to successfully pass the most comprehensive rewrite of the U.S. tax code in 30 years in December. The bill slashed the corporate tax rate from 35 to 21 percent.

Prior to the recent reforms, the U.S. had the highest corporate tax rate of all Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) nations and one of the highest in the world, causing American capital flight for decades. Large U.S. firms have kept some $3.2 trillion overseas since 2005. The worst offenders are in the tech, pharmaceutical and engineering sectors.