Day: June 4, 2018

Mueller Screws Trump By Leaking Private Letter, POTUS Responds With Brutal Surprise

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/7yo38t
Robert Mueller and his band of anti-Trump Democratic lawyers are desperate as their bogus investigation to destroy Donald Trump’s presidency is falling apart. In a last-ditch effort, Special Counsel Mueller leaked a private letter from Trump to the press hoping to corrupt the minds of Americans. The president responded by dropping a brutal surprise on Mueller and those leftist losers in the media, shocking them all. Don’t miss this.

Democrats have put all their eggs in the Mueller basket, meaning it’s imperative to the leftist losers that Mueller does as much damage as he can to President Donald Trump. As a 19-month-long internal affairs report is scheduled to come out next week showing all the corruption and crimes committed by the FBI and DOJ in the Hillary Clinton email scandal, the Deep State rats working with Mueller had to do something to damage Trump, now.

They leaked to the New York Times a private correspondence from the president’s attorney, Jay Sekulow, to the Special Counsel. It says, in a nutshell, the president could not commit “obstruction of justice” by firing former FBI Director James Comey. You see, as the president, he can fire anyone in the executive branch that he wants to fire, anytime, for any reason.
The big conflict, the Deep State rats are counting on, is what was in Trump’s mind. Did he fire Comey to stop the Russia investigation? That’s their big question.

This is just ridiculous. Trump kept his cool and turned over one million pages of documents. There were crimes committed but not by Trump or his campaign.

So President Trump used his Twitter feed as a brutal surprise to Robert Mueller and his Deep State rats in response to them leaking those letters. Trump tweeted, “As only one of two people left who could become President, why wouldn’t the FBI or Department of ‘Justice’ have told me that they were secretly investigating Paul Manafort (on charges that were 10 years old and had been previously dropped) during my campaign? Should have told me!”
Trump added another tweet to finish his thoughts on the Deep State handling this bogus investigation. He posted, “….Paul Manafort came into the campaign very late and was with us for a short period of time (he represented Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole & many others over the years), but we should have been told that Comey and the boys were doing a number on him, and he wouldn’t have been hired!”

Trump is pointing out the investigation was a scam from the start. PJ Media’s D.C. Allister reported, “At this early stage, she [Loretta Lynch] and Comey decided not to tell the Trump campaign about possible national security threats [Manafort] regarding his campaign. When the topic was revisited in late spring, they again decided to say nothing.”

The report added, “This choice to remain silent was a deviation from established guidelines. Investigators are tasked with ‘detecting and interrupting criminal activities at their early stages, and preventing crimes from occurring in the first place,’ which is much more preferable than ‘allowing criminal plots to come to fruition.”‘
This is assuming Paul Manafort, or anyone, like Carter Page or George Pappadapolous, were actual “national security threats.” We are coming at this playing along with the Deep State narrative, namely; that these individuals were national security threats even though there was really no evidence to suggest they were.

Manafort was under suspicion of financial wrongdoing and was already being looked at by the FBI, but he had nothing to do with Russian interference in the election — a point supported by the fact that he has not been indicted for any crimes related to collusion.

But let’s play along with they were national security threats, the question is why didn’t Lynch and Comey alert the campaign? Why would they not stop possible crimes and threats to our national security immediately?

Well, we all know the answer. They never were worried about Russians infiltrating the Trump campaign. They were out to set-up Trump and his campaign, and then his presidency, as committing crimes. So they sent out informants (aka spies) to approach Carter Page and George Pappadopolous who fed them bogus information telling them: “Russia has a ton of dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

When neither Page nor Pappadopolous did anything with that information, like taking it to the campaign team, the Deep State rats sent in the Russian female lawyer to meet with Don Trump, Jr. We all know that meeting ended without anything incriminating happening, either.
So obviously the cabal at the FBI and DOJ were not trying to protect our national security, they were setting up Trump. Now, Special Counsel Robert Mueller is running out of time as Americans learn the truth. We know President Trump won’t stop until those responsible are brought to justice.

BACKLASH: Netflix Takes Major Hit From Conservatives

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/2pucho
It won’t be easy to evoke change at Netflix, after all, they’re the most popular “TV network” in America and more valuable than Disney or Comcast.

But what’s happening now, is a start.
Backlash is brewing after the online streaming giant decided to give a platform to the failed progressive agenda by teaming up with the Obamas and disgraced liar Susan Rice.

In a new poll, Netflix took a massive hit, showing “approval” from conservatives has plummeted by 16 percent in less than 5 months.

If this keeps up, and conservatives truly “tune out,” Netflix could end up like a few other once-popular entities who decided to allow their politics to take center stage: Starbucks, Hollywood, CNN, and the NFL.
Republican’s approval of the internet streaming giant Netflix has dropped amid the company’s recent embrace of Susan Rice and Barack Obama, according to polling data obtained by Variety.

A survey by the research firm YouGov found that Netflix’s positive impression rating with Republicans fell by 16 percent since the beginning of 2018. Meanwhile, the company’s positive impression rating with Democrats has risen by 15 percent in the same period.

While Netflix maintains strong overall approval ratings from the American public, data shows that on a general perception scale of -100 to 100 the company scores 62.8 among Democrats and 41.8 percent among Republicans as of May 31.

The fall in approval comes amid the company’s announcing a “multi-year agreement” with Barack and Michelle Obama to help produce films and series for the platform — a mega-deal that was reportedly brokered by former Obama official and campaign fundraiser Ted Sarandos, who’s now Netflix’s chief content officer.

Sarandos recently downplayed claims of political bias, stating that it is “not The Obama Network” and there is “no political slant” to programming.

In March, Netflix also appointed Obama’s former national security adviser Susan Rice to its board of directors. The California-based company also produced over a hundred episodes of late-night talk show content for left-wing comedian Chelsea Handler, whose show was canceled last October. Comedian Michelle Wolf’s Netflix talk show has taken on the Trump-bashing role that Handler’s show once owned.
Rice’s appointment sparked a backlash from those critical of her controversial role in American foreign policy — most notedly reports that it was Rice who ordered the government surveillance of President Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

According to estimates, Netflix is now more valuable than both Disney and Comcast and is the second most popular television network in the United States.

Politicization 101: Here’s How Comey Succeeded Where Nixon Failed

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/afVMQc
Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey role in #SpyGate makes Nixon’s “Watergate” scandal look like a garden tea party.

Like him or hate him, the bungling former FBI leader did enough bad things “right,” that he was able to keep Hillary Clinton out of prison and politicize the FBI to the point that it’s hardly recognizable from the well-respected bureau it once was.
A little over 40 years ago, Richard Nixon went from a landslide re-election winner to a president forced to resign in disgrace. Nixon’s downfall was the direct result of his unsuccessful attempts to politicize through patronage of an independent, straight-arrow FBI. The commonsense, ethical lesson from this for all government officials would be to avoid attempts to use our nation’s independent fact-finder as a partisan force.

There is as well, of course, a more perverse lesson to be learned from Nixon’s downfall at the hands of an independent FBI, to wit: there is much power to gain by politicizing the Bureau, but only if its upper-leadership team is all on partisan board. Emerging evidence increasingly suggests, sadly, that this was former FBI Director James Comey’s leadership strategy in our country’s most sensitive investigations.

In the years running up to the 1972 election, Deputy Associate FBI Director Mark Felt, serving under feisty bulldog J. Edgar Hoover, staunchly refused the entreaties of Nixon lieutenants to act politically, e.g., to whitewash an ITT/Republican bribery scheme and to lock up innocent war protestors. Felt, the natural successor to Hoover, fell out of White House favor as a result.

Following the death of Hoover in May 1972, Nixon appointed in place of Felt the decent but politically malleable L. Patrick Gray. When six weeks later five burglars were arrested in the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Democratic National Committee, Nixon’s Justice Department tried to limit, through Gray, the scope of the FBI’s investigation. Unfortunately for Nixon, regular Bureau agents, led quietly but spectacularly by Felt, fought these attempts, with a far worse result for Nixon than if the Bureau had been left alone to do its job.

In the years running up to the 2016 presidential election, Comey made sure not to make the same “mistakes” of Felt that plagued Nixon. The IRS conservative harassment scandal was swept under the rug. The Clinton Foundation, seemingly overtly corrupt, was given a pass even after the Uranium One sale by a large Clinton Foundation donor was approved by the Clinton State Department. Comey even went so far as to take the unusual step of exonerating Hillary Clinton for her grossly negligent handling of classified materials, not a decision that was his to make. More shockingly, he permitted the destruction of 30,000 Clinton emails and relevant hard drives. It strains credulity to contend that Comey would have done the same for President Donald Trump if the occasion arose.

Comey’s exoneration of Clinton clearly transgressed clear DOJ standards, although Comey makes a tenuous argument that this was made necessary by the clear bias of Attorney General Loretta Lynch. In so doing, though, he admits that the proper course would have been to recommend a Special Counsel. But, stunningly, he also admits in his recent book that he did not do so because the public might think she was guilty, a political calculation if there ever was one.

Recent revelations show, chillingly, that he involved the FBI in what appears to have been a plot to entrap, and even frame, a political opponent and his campaign regarding Russian collusion. This radical politicization of the Bureau makes any Nixonian scheme seem like child’s play. Nixon shamefully tricked the FBI into doing a routine background check on his enemy, journalist Daniel Schorr. Comey outdid Nixon by a wide margin, using his FBI to construct a false case of possible treason against a political enemy.

During the Watergate investigation, Felt sought not to frame anyone but merely to be allowed to fully pursue the bureau’s investigation, so that no one could accuse the FBI of conducting a “whitewash.” Felt and his bureau were resisting politicization, not pursuing it, even though helping the party in power, Nixon’s, would have brought accolades and perks to his leadership team.