Day: June 4, 2018

YUGE WIN! Supreme Court Just Made Final Ruling – Liberals Are PISSED!

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/1VGw9g
A wedding cake is not just a cake in a Free Speech analysis. It is the artistic expression of the person making it that is to be used traditionally as a centerpiece in the celebration of a marriage. While the state of Colorado disagreed with this assessment, it seems the Supreme Court does not concur.

The Supreme Court issues a limited ruling on Monday on a Lakewood baker named Jack Phillips. Phillips is the owner of Masterpiece Bakery and he refused to make a wedding cake for a same-s*x couple stating his religious beliefs did not allow him to be an active participant in an act his faith teaches is wrong. It was his contention that because of the first amendment, Phillips’ religious objections did not violate Colorado’s anti-discrimination law.

The court declined to rule on the big issue of this case which would potentially decide whether or not a business can invoke religious objections to refuse service to gay and lesbian people. The Supreme Court justices instead issued a limited ruling addressing what the court described as the significant anti-religious bias on the Colorado Civil Rights Commission when it ruled against Phillips.

According to Colorado’s local Fox News affiliate KDVR – “The justices voted 7-2 that the commission violated Phillips’ rights under the First Amendment.
Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion that the issue “must await further elaboration.”

Appeals in similar cases are pending, including one at the Supreme Court from a florist who didn’t want to provide flowers for a same-s*x wedding.

The same-s*x couple at the heart of the case, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, complained to the Colorado commission in 2012 after they visited Phillips’ Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood and the baker quickly told them he would not create a cake for a same-s*x wedding.

Colorado law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and the commission concluded that Phillips’ refusal violated the law. Colorado state courts upheld the determination.

But when the justices heard arguments in December, Kennedy was plainly bothered by comments by a commission member.

The commissioner seemed “neither tolerant nor respectful of Mr. Phillips’ religious beliefs,” Kennedy said then.

That same sentiment suffused his opinion on Monday.

“The commission’s hostility was inconsistent with the First Amendment’s guarantee that our laws be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion,” he wrote.

Liberal justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan joined the conservative justices in the outcome. Kagan wrote separately to emphasize the limited ruling.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.

In a statement issued after the ruling, Phillips’ Supreme Court lawyer praised the decision.

“Government hostility toward people of faith has no place in our society, yet the state of Colorado was openly antagonistic toward Jack’s religious beliefs about marriage. The court was right to condemn that,” said Kristen Waggoner, the Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel who argued Phillips’ case.

Waggoner said Phillips is willing to sell ready-made products to anyone who enters his store. But, “he simply declines to express messages or celebrate events that violate his deeply held beliefs,” she said.”
Of further issue and still an outstanding concern regarding that of religious freedom and freedom of expression has yet to be decided, however. The issue of whether America has even the pretense of freedom in a country whose very foundation is rooted in religious freedom and freedom of speech.

For businesses to conduct themselves in a manner contrary to their religious beliefs in a country founded on religious freedom is contradictory to our founding principles. Pick a position…either a private business has the ability to conduct itself in a manner consistent with freedom or it does not and if it does not? Just rename the United States of America and call it North Korea and get it over with. Your “free” country is d**d.

Craig and Mullins were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union in their legal fight against Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop stated of the limited decision it was pleased the court did not endorse a broad religion-based exemption from anti-discrimination laws.

Louise Melling, the ACLU’s deputy legal director stated – “The court reversed the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision based on concerns unique to the case but reaffirmed its longstanding rule that states can prevent the harms of discrimination in the marketplace, including against LGBT people.

The Classiest First Lady In History Has The Best Reply To The Classless Samantha Bee

Source: https://goo.gl/PmKc6T
The most classy First Lady you could find in the White House has finally responded to the boarish foul-mouth jokes by Samantha Bee who went after Ivanka Trump for no reason. Perhaps Bee went after the Trump daughter because she’s super successful and beautiful, but no one’s really sure what provoked the attack when Bee called her a “feckless c-nt.” Nevertheless, Bee persisted to go on with the attack that was unwarranted and unprovoked, sparking a national outrage of people blasting her network for the nasty double standard she’s trying to embrace as she hasn’t been fire yet. She’s lost a few advertisers, but that’s about it.

It was with such grace that the office of Melania Trump finally responded to questions about the blabbering Bee and their reply helps prove why Melania is one of the most class First Lady’s you’ll ever see parade around the White House. Their response took the higher road and reminded people of how to act when someone goes after your family with some lewd words and lack of humor. Had Samantha Bee said something that was actually funny, then people would take it as a joke, laugh, and move on. Except, there’s just one problem. Samantha Bee isn’t funy. She’s like the blonde Kathy Griffin – they’re just not good at comedy. It’s a subjective topic, but many would agree that the two can’t seem to muster up enough jokes to make people get a good laugh. The pair is more like a tag team of torture. Throw a little bit of Michelle Wolf in the mix and you have the three worst.

With all further ado, it was Daily Caller who broke the exclusive story about Melania’s office and their response to the blithering Bee:

“First lady Melania Trump’s office responded to TBS comedian Samantha Bee’s profane tirade against presidential adviser Ivanka Trump by saying it was an example of an “astounding” double standard.
The official spokeswoman for the first lady, Stephanie Grisham, gave The Daily Caller an exclusive statement on the issue on behalf of Trump.

“The double standard is truly astounding,” Grisham told TheDC. “Time and again the Trump family and members of this Administration are subjected to false reporting, hateful rhetoric and outrageous lies all in the name of freedom of speech or comedy, yet the mainstream media stays silent.”

Bee called Ivanka Trump a “feckless c**t” in a segment targeting her for posting a photo with her daughter over the weekend. Ivanka posted this photo with her youngest child to draw the ire of the late night host:

After NBC Lets Clinton Off The Hook, Juanita Drops The Hammer On His Manhood

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
Source: https://goo.gl/pvyn6c
NBC News essentially let former President Bill Clinton off the hook easy in an interview which aired on Monday. Clinton, whose entire political career has been plagued by sexual scandal, was not made to answer for his actions. So, Juanita Broaddrick stepped up to do what the media would not, dropping the hammer on Slick Willy’s manhood.

Juanita Broaddrick has ripped NBC for not asking Bill Clinton about raping her in a “Today Show” interview that aired on Monday. NBC’s Craig Melvin did ask Clinton about his relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, at which point the former president grew heated and defended his reprehensible actions:

Former President Bill Clinton insisted in a weekend interview that he doesn’t owe a personal apology to Monica Lewinsky, the former White House intern whose adult life has been defined by their inappropriate sexual affair and the global scrutiny that followed.

‘No,’ he told NBC in an interview airing Monday on the ‘Today’ show. ‘I do not – I have never talked to her. But I did say publicly on more than one occasion that I was sorry.’

‘I apologized to everybody in the world,’ Clinton said, implying that was enough.

And the flustered former president, more famous for his Don Juan-like seductions than for his policy legacy, portrayed himself, not Lewinsky, as history’s victim in the mass-media’s retelling of the 1990s saga. [Source: Daily Mail]

Clinton went on to claim that “a lot of the facts have been omitted to make the story work,” declaring, “I think partly because they’re frustrated that they got all these serious allegations against the current occupant of the Oval Office and his voters don’t seem to care.”
He also complained in the interview that he left the presidency financially ruined because of the costs associated with the legal consequences of his actions. “Nobody believes that I got out of that for free,” he said. “I left the White House $16 million in debt.”

Clinton is worth about $80 million today, thanks in large part to his aggressive schedule of speaking events, many of which paid him six-figure fees.

But, of course, Bill Clinton shouldn’t have gotten out of the Lewinsky mess scot-free. He abused his power, he degraded the highest office in the country, and he made America look bad on the world stage. NBC’s Craig Melvin did not see fit to confront Clinton over any of these things. Instead, he let the former president off easy, never pressing him further about the fact that he ruined Lewinsky’s life, yet has gone on to do quite well for himself.
Juanita Broaddrick was not about to do the same. She slammed NBC and Craig Melvin for ignoring the fact that not only did Bill Clinton have affair with Monica Lewinsky, but he raped her years earlier. “This is so disgusting,” Broaddrick tweeted. “Is there ANY reporter willing to ask Bill Clinton about RAPING me?”

“Would the NBC TODAY show like for me to come on and talk about my RAPE by Bill Clinton since they don’t have the ‘balls’ to ask him,” the 75-year-old continued. “Oh..Wait…… you are the same Network that delayed my interview until after the scumbag’s impeachment hearing was over.”

Bill Clinton still refuses to take responsibility for his actions decades later, which just goes to show that he hasn’t changed much — he’s still the same slimy, lecherous, predator he has always been. The fact that he tried to deflect when confronted about the Lewinsky affair by mentioning President Donald Trump is proof.

Of course, Clinton certainly didn’t expect to be confronted about his infamous affair with Monica Lewinsky during his interview with NBC. The media is traditionally easy on prominent Democrats like Bill and his wife Hillary, as well as their friends Barack and Michelle Obama. Indeed, these guys can do no wrong in the press’ eyes, so they’re never made to answer for their glaring indiscretions.
Perhaps the shock factor of finally having to answer for his wrongdoing was what angered Bill Clinton so greatly. This just goes to show how pronounced the double-standard truly is when it comes to Republicans and Democrats. Every day, President Donald Trump is confronted with women he allegedly had relations with literally decades before he ever ran for office. Yet, ask Bill Clinton about the affair he had inside the Oval Office and all hell breaks loose. And the fact that he raped Juanita Broaddrick? That never even happened, according to the mainstream media.