Day: June 5, 2018

Roseanne Just Made Heartbreaking Announcement About Her Immediate Future

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/GCxBzZ
On Wednesday Roseanne Barr tweeted that she might actually fight ABC’s move to cancel her show after an offensive tweet for which she apologized for. Good for her! But what was also very interesting, and not far-fetched at all was the fact that she appeared to endorse the idea that former first lady Michelle Obama could have been behind her firing.

All this came about when ABC announced that it would be canceling her number one rated show “Roseanne” after Barr sent out a controversial tweet about Barack Obama’s top White House aide and friend, Valerie Jarrett.

“Muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj,” Barr wrote.

But on Wednesday, Barr continued by tweeting that the positive feedback she has been receiving from people who support her has emboldened her efforts to combat ABC. Barr said she is going to examine all of her options and fight back.
Although almost a week later her show is still, and probably will remain canceled, most of her fans are wishing that another network, like Fox who picked up “Last Man Standing,” would maybe pick up the show. But as fans keep fanning the flames on those rumors, Roseanne showed up to pour ice cold water on them.

Barr also responded to another tweet to dispell a fake story that Fox had already agreed to pick up the show in 3 months.

Meanwhile, a rumor that is, in fact, truth is the one which came out late last week that they would continue the show “Roseanne” without its superstar. And considering ABC belongs to Disney my bet is they will make it surrounding the kid who is confused as to how he is supposed to dress.

More on this via Slash Film:

“A Roseanne spinoff that wisely omits Roseanne is all but a done deal at this point. Multiple sources report that execs and creatives are working on a way to bring the show back with almost the entire cast and crew, while omitting Roseanne Barr herself. That’s fine.

A little over a week ago, ABC pulled the plug on their popular Roseanne revival after star Roseanne Barr posted a racist comment on her already-toxic Twitter account. Since then, there have been rumblings of a possible way to save the show without Roseanne being involved. Now, it seems like that’s all but a done deal. Earlier this week, TMZ reported that ABC was considering rebranding the show to make Sara Gilbert‘s Darlene, Roseanne’s daughter on the show, the new main character. Gilbert allegedly reached out to see if they would be interested in taking part in such a show, and co-star John Goodman apparently said he was “very interested.”

The Roseanne revival was really Gilbert’s project – she spearheaded the revival, and it was clear bringing the show back meant a lot to her. Unfortunately, that meant hitching the series to Roseanne Barr, a figure who has used her Twitter account to push conspiracy theories and racist views. Now, however, Gilbert might have a chance to bring the show back without all that toxic baggage.

Less than 24 hours ago, both Deadline and THR have both offered updates on what’s going on with all of this. Deadline says “there is no big news to report but there has been some progress”, adding that executive producers Tom Werner and Gilbert are both spearheading efforts to keep the show going with the original writers and crew. Deadline also says that while chances of a Roseanne-less Rosanne revival are getting better every day, there are also hurdles to overcome, such as “legal and rights issues that need to be settled as Barr was executive producer on the series and has ownership/backend.”

THR, meanwhile, says a “formal announcement could come this week” to make the new reboot official. Like Deadline, they also report that virtually everyone in the cast (except Roseanne Barr, of course) will be back, as well as the original crew, creative team and showrunner Bruce Helford. Multiple deals are being discussed – they just have to zero in on one.

This is for the best. The cast of the show – especially Goodman and Laurie Metcalf, who plays Roseanne’s sister – all deserve better than being tethered to Barr’s toxic orbit. Giving these actors a chance to step out of the shadow of the previous show and forge something potentially better is a winning scenario. We just need to see when and if it will happen.”

Not sure about all of you, but I for one won’t be watching “Roseanne” without Roseanne!

Scores Of FBI Agents Are Speaking Out Against Corrupted Hillary Probe – Afraid To Testify

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/iGg1VP
Although being subpoenaed to appear in front of a judge is something the majority of people would want to try to avoid, a new report has now come out that dozens of FBI agents are ready, able, and willing to have their day in court to expose the corruption that was going on during the Barack Hussein Obama regime.

Last Friday, on Hannity’s Fox News show, he was able to confirm that more than two dozen FBI agents are willing to be subpoenaed in order to testify about what was widespread abuses and political bias that occurred at the bureau during the Hillary Clinton email scandal when Obama was president.
And all this is being backed by a stack of evidence to back up Carter’s claim. Sara Carter is an investigative journalist whose reporting on Comey, the FBI and Clinton scandals have been proven correct time after time.

Here is more via Conservative Tribune:

“We have an (Inspector General) report coming out, and I’m told as many as 28 people that have knowledge of the Clinton email server scandal want to be subpoenaed so they can tell the story of corruption at the highest levels of the bureau at that they love,” Hannity said.

It appears that Hannity isn’t the only one who sees a major rift between top-level FBI figures, like former Director James Comey, and the hardworking agents who want to see justice served.

“Sara Carter, an investigative journalist whose reporting on Comey, the FBI and Clinton scandals has been proven correct with shocking accuracy, agreed with the Fox host.
“There are a lot of FBI agents that want to come out and speak,” Carter told Hannity. “A lot of them are current agents, which makes it very difficult for them, so they need to be subpoenaed. These are the things that Congress needs to act on.”

A growing stack of evidence backs up that claim.
The Daily Caller recently reported that several FBI agents have quietly come forward and admitted that many good people at the bureau are worried about speaking out because of career and legal reprisals from above.

FBI agents concerned about corruption are “hunkering down because they see good people being thrown to the dogs for speaking out and speaking out does nothing to solve the problems,” the Daily Caller quoted one agent who communicated via a former White House official.

Those rank-and-file agents believe the upper levels of the agency think they can get away with anything, while middle-level personnel are left powerless to speak out.

“It’s a question of basic credibility — Congress, the executive, and oversight are not seen to have any gravitas or seriousness,” The Daily Caller quoted its FBI source, who for obvious reasons wanted to stay anonymous. “The inmates have been running the asylum and they don’t respect, much less fear, their overseers. We know we’ll be hung out to dry.”

So-called “whistle-blower protections” are supposed to shield witnesses of abuse, but these are not always as strong as they should be.

“I’ve worked hard to strengthen legal protections, especially for FBI employees,” Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley said.

RELATED: Bill Clinton Portrays Himself as the Victim When Asked About Monica Lewinsky Scandal

“You have a right to cooperate with Congressional inquiries, just as you have a right to cooperate with the Inspector General. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying,” Grassley added.

But FBI members are apparently not convinced.

“Even with the enactment of the new (whistle-blower protection) law, what is the deterrent for retaliation against Whistleblowers?” an FBI source told the Daily Caller.

“The FBI executives will just stall, ignore, and run out the clock until the victim runs out of money for legal fees or else retires,” the agent noted.

Being ordered to testify under oath could be a sort of long-shot “Hail Mary” play to shine a light on the truth.

“That is why the new whistleblowers want to be subpoenaed,” the agent said, according to the Caller. “They simply don’t have the resources to fight the inevitable retaliation that will ensue, regardless of the new law.”
There is a clear hesitation for witnesses of “deep state” corruption to come forward — and that’s where Congress may come into play.

By subpoenaing FBI members who have direct knowledge of corruption and political games within the bureau, lawmakers could give the good people who are still with the agency the protection they need to expose the truth.”

After Trump Pardons Ex-Navy Sailor, He Immediately Gets Revenge On Hillary Clinton

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/Qnoyzx
Kristian Saucier was one of five people to receive a pardon from President Donald Trump. So what has the former Navy sailor done so far with his newfound freedom? Well, he turned right around and got revenge on Hillary Clinton, who is guilty of the same crime that put him behind bars.

While campaigning for the White House — and after taking office — President Donald Trump frequently voiced support for Kristian Saucier, who in March became the second person Trump pardoned. Trump often juxtaposed the Obama administration’s handling of Saucier’s case with that of Hillary Clinton, who got away scot-free for doing the same thing on a much bigger scale.

Now, Saucier, who served a year in federal prison for taking photos of classified sections of the submarine on which he worked, is planning to file a lawsuit against Obama administration officials, alleging that he was subject to unequal protection of the law. Saucier argues that the same officials who meted out punishment to him for his actions chose to be lenient with Hillary Clinton in her use of a private email server and handling of classified information.
“They interpreted the law in my case to say it was criminal, but they didn’t prosecute Hillary Clinton. Hillary is still walking free. Two guys on my ship did the same thing and weren’t treated as criminals. We want them to correct the wrong,” said Saucier. “My case was usually something handled by military courts. They used me as an example because of [the backlash over] Hillary Clinton.”

Saucier, who lives in Vermont, pleaded guilty in 2016 to taking photos inside the USS Alexandria while it was stationed in Groton, Connecticut, in 2009. He said he only wanted service mementos, but federal prosecutors argued he was a disgruntled sailor who had put national security at risk by taking photos showing the submarine’s propulsion system and reactor compartment and then obstructed justice by destroying a laptop and camera.

Saucier said that he recognized he had erred in taking the photos, which he said he wanted to show only to his family to show them where he worked. But he lashed out at Obama officials, saying that his prosecution was politically motivated, prompted by sensitivity about classified information amid the scandal involving Clinton’s emails. [Source: Fox News]

Saucier’s lawyer, Ronald Daigle, said on Monday that the lawsuit, which he expects to file soon in Manhattan, will name the U.S. Department of Justice, former FBI Director James Comey, and former President Barack Obama as defendants, among others. Daigle said that a notice about the pending lawsuit was sent to the Department of Justice and others included in it in December. There is usually a six-month period that must elapse before the lawsuit actually is filed.
“We’ll highlight the differences in the way Hillary Clinton was prosecuted and how my client was prosecuted,” said Daigle. “We’re seeking to cast a light on this to show that there’s a two-tier justice system and we want it to be corrected.”

Saucier has been able to pick up the pieces and rebuild his life with his wife and young daughter, thanks to President Trump’s pardon. A felony conviction left him scrambling to find work, but he finally landed a job collecting garbage. Now, he works on design and engineering projects for an industrial boiler company.

“Things are starting to go in the right direction,” he said. “I work with a group of really great people. I get to use my skills set. With a pardon, there’s no magic wand that gets waved and makes everything right. But I try to stay positive and look forward.”

Because of the loss of income during his imprisonment, as well as earning below his potential when he collected garbage, the 31-year-old and his wife Sadie lost their home to foreclosure. Then, debt collectors called and their cars were repossessed.
However, things are now headed in the right direction for the young couple, and they’ve got President Donald Trump to thank for it. Please share Kristian Saucier’s story if you applaud his efforts to hold Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration accountable!

Acosta Screams ‘Sarah Sanders Must Be Stopped’ After She ‘Kicks His Butt’ On Live TV

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/ChcxvV
CNN’s White House Correspondent Jim Acosta is out of his mind with rage at Sarah Huckabee Sanders. Acosta lost his temper yesterday after the press secretary caught him in a lie. But that’s not all. That caused the bitter CNN reporter to scream, “Sarah Sanders must be stopped,” as he took to social media ranting like a lunatic after Sanders kicked his sorry butt on live TV. You’ll love this.

The White House briefing room has become a battlefield where press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders suits up daily armed with her weapons: common sense and the truth. The enemy is the press corps filled with leftwing nutjobs who are armed with lies and falsehoods. Yesterday, CNN’s Jim Acosta pushed Sarah too far, and he paid the price.

It all started with the mainstream media’s preoccupation with a non-story they twisted to suit their false narrative about President Donald Trump. Grappling to find anything negative to report on the president, the press corps used an interview from Sunday morning with George Stephanopoulos and Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani.

The big issue the leftwing nutjobs twisted was this idea that the president can “pardon himself.” Stephanopoulos, a crafty seasoned Clinton politico, asked Guiliani a ridiculous question, “Do you and the president’s attorneys believe the president has the power to pardon himself?”
“That’s another really interesting constitutional argument, can the president pardon himself. He has no intention of pardoning himself, but that doesn’t say he can’t,” Giuliani says. “I think the political ramifications of that would be tough,” he adds.

Actually, the president can pardon himself, per the Constitution. But any president who had committed real crimes and pardoned himself no doubt would be committing political suicide, that’s what Guiliani is saying. It’s also a question which has absolutely nothing to do with Trump.

This was a masterful move by Stephanopoulos, and Guiliani probably should have just refused to comment on it at all. What the goal was for the leftists is to flood the news cycle with the soundbite, “President Trump will pardon himself.”
If you know nothing about the Mueller investigation and all you see or hear is “Trump will pardon himself,” that implies the president has committed a crime or crimes and he is hatching some plan to just pardon himself. This is how the game is played by the leftists, folks.

So with that backdrop, Sarah Sanders goes into Monday’s press conference and of course, the leftwing press corps asks question after question about this “pardon issue.” Sarah already knows the game, and she answers the “pardon question” saying, “The president has done nothing wrong so he wouldn’t need one [a pardon].”
But ole Jim Acosta hasn’t been called on yet. Sarah’s already gone over and over the ridiculous pardon issue when she gets to the whiny CNN reporter. Acosta is pumped up over a Huffington Post piece which quotes Guiliani.

“If he [Trump] shot James Comey, he’d be impeached the next day,” Giuliani said to the Huffington Post. He added, “Impeach him, and then you can do whatever you want to do to him.”

Rudy was pissed off as he spoke to Huffington Post. If you read the entire article, it’s quite clear the leftist outlet is pressing Guiliani also on this irrelevant “pardon issue.” The former New York mayor is just plain fed-up with having to explain the Constitution to these idiots, and his answer reflects his irritation.

So Acosta thinks he’s got Sarah Sanders on this Guiliani statement about shooting Comey. Jim’s excited, asking the press secretary, “So are those comments appropriate coming from the president’s outside lawyers about shooting Comey?”

Sarah Sanders is bored to tears as she looks at Acosta. She’s not impressed with Acosta’s so-called “gotcha question.” She dismisses his stupid ramblings with her panned answer, “You’d have to ask Rudy Guiliani about his specific comments, but thankfully the president hasn’t done anything wrong so we feel very comfortable…”
At that point, Sanders is cut off by Acosta yelling, “Sarah! Sarah, can ask I follow-up question? If I could just ask a follow-up…” Sarah talks over Acosta’s whines and calls on another reporter. As Acosta persists, Sanders says, “Sorry I’m just moving on,” then answering his pathetic cries for another question she says, “No, not today Jim.” Just like a mother scolding a child.

Wimpy Acosta kept shouting that other reporters got follow-up questions, which is a bald-faced lie. “No, they didn’t,” said Sanders, slapping him down. The entire dust-up takes only a few seconds, but it causes Acosta to become enraged as the press secretary utterly humiliates him