“No One Expected This” Here’s Why The YouTube Shooting Disappeared From Headlines

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
“No One Expected This” Here’s Why The YouTube Shooting Disappeared From Headlines
SOURCE : https://goo.gl/rDCq2m

Has everyone noticed how this week’s YouTube shooting has magically disappeared from the headlines? While the Parkland School Shooting is still front page news two months later? Here are the reasons.

The shooter wasn’t a white male. In fact, it was a woman who was a “peaceful vegan,” who even fought for animal rights and supported PETA. This goes totally against everything the left stream media has told us about mass shootings. She wasn’t a man in his early 20’s who embraced the American gun culture.

The shooter used a 9mm handgun, not a big bad mean looking black AR-15 which the media can lie about. And a 9mm handgun is something that’s practically impossible to ban because it’s not part of the “Assault Rifle” narrative, although it can do just about as much damage as an “Armalite Rifle.”

The shooting happened in the looney state of California where they have the strictest gun control of all 50 states unless you are an illegal alien shooting at sea lions. In fact, starting next year every gun owner in California will have to pay the state $50 a year to get a special license to purchase ammo, even .22lr. And that ammo will be serialized and tracked to the person buying it. So the state will know how much ammo you buy.

Authorities, just like in the Parkland shooting were warned but they failed to protect the citizens. Yes, the father of this shooter notified police that his daughter was going to do something like this to YouTube. Police found her and let her go because they deemed her to not be a threat. And the left keeps telling us we don’t need guns because the police are there to protect us.

The shooter developed a hatred towards YouTube, which is owned by Google because they were censoring her videos. This is something the liberal media chooses to ignore considering it doesn’t affect them, but it does affect almost every publisher on the right. And that includes gun content, even if it’s just instructional on how to safely load and reload a firearm, even a shotgun which former Vice President Joe Biden said was enough for all your security needs.

Here is more on social media censorship via Paste Magazine:

“Take Twitter, for example. The online social networking service is often criticized for not protecting its users and allowing pretty much anything on its platform. Because it does allow anything on its platform and that’s part of why people love it so much.

Twitter is also kind of like a filing cabinet that records and preserves our digital history for us. You can go to Twitter, search a hashtag and find photos, articles and all the opinions you could ever want to hear on a particular moment from (recent) history. That’s pretty cool, when you think about it. But what’s not cool is finding tweets that you never saw, tweets that seemingly disappeared even though the 140-characters were typed.

Twitter has been caught removing tweets, hiding tweets and deleting trending hashtags. Such accusations have opened the doors to how such a prominent platform—which sources the news for over half the population-gets away with censorship before our very eyes.
It was just a few months ago that Twitter was accused of censoring tweets under ‘#DNCLeak’ during the WikiLeaks e-mail debacle. In this particular scenario, conservative Twitter users accused the platform of removing the hashtag from the trending bar, despite it displaying an estimated 250,000 tweets about the leaked employee e-mails from the Democratic National Committee.

On the other side of the political spectrum, of course, is the whole Milo Yiannopoulos situation, which involves permanent censorship in the form of banning. Another accusation comes from Trump supporters, which say the social platform concealed his tweets asking for campaign donations.

But is this censorship? Or is it just the work of a flawed algorithm?

Twitter, like other social platforms, works off an automated algorithm that determines what appears in your news feed and when. The information that shows up is based on an analysis of whom you interact with and what kind of tweets the algorithm thinks you’ll be more interested in seeing.

In some cases, you might not see a person’s tweets in your timeline because of the algorithm. Then, when you go to that person’s Twitter profile, there will be a slew of tweets you never saw. It could be as innocent as an algorithm only pushing certain tweets to the front of your feed-but that very fact shows the kind of power Twitter has.
credibl