REPORT: Obama Was So DUMBFOUNDED Over Trump’s WIN, He Went Into ‘SHOCK’

REPORT: Obama Was So DUMBFOUNDED Over Trump’s WIN, He Went Into ‘SHOCK’

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/DodZjS
source: https://goo.gl/jyrcn6
Why were liberals so shocked that President Trump soundly beat Hillary Clinton?

She was arguably the worst candidate they could have picked, and had to cheat her way through the primary.
And speaking of failures, Barack Obama was a terrible president.

This was the election for real HOPE AND CHANGE, and Hillary Clinton does not represent “change” in manner, shape, or form.

Problem is, liberals are so smug, and clueless they can’t see past their own elite noses to observe what’s really happening in their own country.

This is why a new book states that at the time of President Trump’s victory, Obama was so dumbfounded he was in “SHOCK.”

Former top adviser Ben Rhodes writes that Obama was actually “shell-shocked” by Trump’s win, which just goes to show how truly out of touch Obama and his cronies truly are.
President Barack Obama was veritably shell-shocked in the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory in 2016, and even asked aides “What if we were wrong?” as he struggled to come to terms with Hillary Clinton’s defeat, former adviser Ben Rhodes writes in a new memoir coming out in June.

The book, titled “The World As It Is,” highlights efforts by Obama’s brain trust to reassure him that he would have won re-election if he were allowed to run for a third term.

But Obama remained alternately optimistic and dejected, according to Rhodes, who has been feted as an aspiring novelist-turned national security wunderkind.

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. … Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”
“There are more stars in the sky than grains of sand on the earth,” the book quotes Obama saying in a message to Rhodes the day after the election.

“Maybe this is what people want.”

– Former President Barack Obama, trying to understand Donald Trump’s election win

Days later, Obama reportedly came back down to Earth, saying: “Maybe this is what people want. I’ve got the economy set up well for him. No facts. No consequences. They can just have a cartoon.”

Rhodes was promoted from presidential speechwriter to deputy national security adviser under Obama. He held that post during the raid that killed Usama bin Laden, as well as the U.S. intervention in Libya and the signing of the Iran nuclear deal.

The possibility that Trump could unravel that legacy apparently weighed on Obama, Rhodes writes.

“I feel like Michael Corleone,” Obama reportedly said, referencing “The Godfather” character as he prepared to hand over the White House to Trump. “I almost got out.”

According to Rhodes, he and Obama were not aware that the FBI had begun an investigation into the Trump campaign’s dealings with Russia until after the election.

The book also touches on some foreign-policy melodrama as Obama made his exit from the world stage, amid a shifting geopolitical climate that included Brexit and rising disenchantment with globalism.

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany had a “single tear in her eye” when she and Obama parted for the last time, and Obama noted that “she’s all alone” to defend his liberal principles, according to Rhodes.

In footage from an HBO documentary recording on election night in 2016, Rhodes himself was seen sitting alone outside on a bench, haltingly repeating that the situation was difficult to “process.”

This video of a shell-shocked Ben Rhodes after Hillary’s election loss taken from a new HBO documentary is incredible. pic.twitter.com/EnJllQ5rBX

— neontaster (@neontaster) May 30, 2018

But in his memoir, Rhodes says he should have predicted the result.

“I couldn’t shake the feeling that I should have seen it coming,” he writes. “Because when you distilled it, stripped out the racism and misogyny, we’d run against Hillary eight years ago with the same message Trump had used: She’s part of a corrupt establishment that can’t be trusted to bring change.”