Tag: Conspiracy News

Christian Baker Celebrated Big Win In Supreme Court, Has 6 Bold Words For Liberals

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/LfKsNH
The Christian baker who recently celebrated a big win in the Supreme Court has six bold words for the liberals in the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. You won’t want to miss this.

On Monday, June 4, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court handed a shocking victory to a Colorado Christian baker who refused for religious reasons to create a wedding cake for a gay couple, according to Breitbart. The Supreme Court’s decision sent a shockwave throughout the liberal world as they stopped just short of setting a major precedent, allowing Americans to claim exemptions from anti-discrimination laws based on religious beliefs.

In a startling 7-2 decision, the justices said the Colorado Civil Rights Commision showed an impermissible hostility toward religion when it found that baker Jack Phillips violated the state’s anti-discrimination law by rebuffing gay couple David Mullins and Charlie Craig in 2012. The state law prohibits businesses from refusing service based on race, sex, marital status, or sexual orientation. The ruling concluded that the commission violated Phillips’ religious rights under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.
The Supreme Court declined to issue a definitive ruling on the circumstances under which Americans can seek exemptions from anti-discrimination laws based on their religious views. Their ruling does, however, open the door for other similar cases to be heard by the Supreme Court.

During his first cable TV interview with Fox News‘ Fox & Friends, Phillips and attorney Kristen Waggoner with Alliance Defending Freedom expressed their support for the Supreme Court’s ruling. Phillips spoke first about his victory which included six bold words for the liberals in the Colorado Civil Rights Commision

“It was a big win. It was a big win for us and now we’re just looking forward to hopefully getting back into the wedding business and we’ll see how the court ruling affects that,” Phillips said.
I could not agree with more with Phillips. Instead of taking his tremendous victory from the Supreme Court and stepping back to a quieter lifestyle, he is going right back to doing what he loves under the guidelines of his faith. Phillips truly represents the core American values that conservatives fight for and try to preserve on a daily basis in America.

When asked to clarify his decision to get back into the wedding business, Phillips said, “I got into the bakery business, one of the main reasons is because I love doing wedding cakes. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission took that away from me, and now hopefully we can get back and do the baking that I love.”

Phillips’ attorney then weighed in when she was asked to clarify that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission did initially command Phillips to stop being a baker. “Well, it said a whole lot more than that, and Justice Kennedy reflected that in the majority decision. Jack loves and serves anyone who walks in his store. All walks of life but he has never promoted all messages through his cakes. He’s declined a number of different cakes. Halloween messages or cakes that would celebrate divorce so this was just one of many different cakes that he will not bake because he sketches, sculps, and hand-designs artistic expression,” Waggoner said.
When asked how he would respond to those who say that he’s making a bad business decision by turning away certain money-making opportunities that violate his religious beliefs, Phillips said, “Ultimately, I serve everybody who comes into the store. I just don’t create cakes with every message that people ask me to create for them.”

In response to being asked who are the people he would say no to, Phillips responded, “Like Kristen just said, I don’t do cakes for Halloween. I wouldn’t make cakes that were anti-American or that would disparage people in any way. Including people who identify as LGBT. If someone asked me to do a cake like that, then I would tell them no.”

Phillips did emphasize that he has received a good deal of support from his local community throughout this ordeal and hopes to get his business, Masterpiece Cakeshop, back into full operation.
In my opinion, Phillips represents the very best of us. His nearly six-year court battle through the liberal Colorado court system and appeals courts has been tremendously damaging to his personal life and his business as Waggoner noted during the interview. The truth of the matter is that Phillips was persecuted by the Colorado Civil Rights Commission because of his Christian faith, and now that liberal run state agency should answer for their wrongdoing and compensate Phillips for the enormous loss of business and quality of life he has sacrificed.

JUST IN: IG Report Will Implicate Comey

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/wDcZTP
DOJ’s watchdog group has concluded that disgraced former FBI Director James Comey defied authority while he was head of the corrupt bureau.

The much-anticipated IG report even uses the word “insubordinate” to describe Comey and his actions.
This is, of course, more vindication for President Trump, who fired James Comey and faced backlash from Democrats, and the lying liberal media.

The Justice Department’s internal watchdog has concluded that James Comey defied authority at times during his tenure as FBI director, according to sources familiar with a draft report on the matter.

One source told ABC News that the draft report explicitly used the word “insubordinate” to describe Comey’s behavior. Another source agreed with that characterization but could not confirm the use of the term.

In the draft report, Inspector General Michael Horowitz also rebuked former Attorney General Loretta Lynch for her handling of the federal investigation into Hillary Clinton‘s personal email server, the sources said.

On Tuesday morning, President Donald Trump complained of “numerous delays” in the release of Horowitz’s final report, which is expected to run several hundred pages long and be released in the coming days. The sources who spoke to ABC News were willing or able to address only a portion of the draft report’s complete findings.

“What is taking so long with the Inspector General’s Report on Crooked Hillary and Slippery James Comey,” Trump said on Twitter. “Hope report is not being changed and made weaker!”

There is no indication the president has seen – or will see – a draft of the report before its release. Horowitz, however, could revise the draft report now that current and former officials mentioned in it have offered their responses to the inspector general’s conclusions, according to the sources.

Almost from the start, the long-awaited report was expected to chastise Comey for his handling of the Clinton-related probe. But in apparently describing Comey’s defiance of authority, the draft report was criticizing a man who prided himself on his leadership style at the FBI and has since dedicated his post-government life to promoting a new generation of effective leaders.

The draft of Horowitz’s wide-ranging report specifically called out Comey for ignoring objections from the Justice Department when he disclosed in a letter to Congress just days before the 2016 presidential election that FBI agents had reopened the Clinton probe, according to sources. Clinton has said that letter doomed her campaign.
Before Comey sent the letter to Congress, at least one senior Justice Department official told the FBI that publicizing the bombshell move so close to an election would violate longstanding department policy, and it would ignore federal guidelines prohibiting the disclosure of information related to an ongoing investigation, ABC News was told.

In an interview in April, ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos asked Comey: “If Attorney General Lynch had ordered you not to send the letter, would you have sent it?”

“No,” Comey responded. “I believe in the chain of command.”

But in backing Trump’s ultimate decision to fire Comey last year, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein slammed Comey’s letter to Congress and said it “was wrong” for Comey “to usurp the Attorney General’s authority” when he announced in July 2016 that the FBI would not be filing charges against Clinton or her aides.

“It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement,” Rosenstein said in a letter to Trump recommending Comey be fired. “At most, the Director should have said the FBI had completed its investigation and presented its findings to federal prosecutors.”

Horowitz’s draft report cited Comey for failing to consult with Lynch and other senior Justice Department officials before making his announcement on national TV. While saying there was no “clear evidence” that Clinton “intended to violate” the law, Comey insisted the former secretary of state was “extremely careless” in her “handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

“I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say,” Comey said before cameras on July 5, 2016.

By then, Lynch had taken the unusual step of publicly declaring she would accept the FBI’s recommendations in the case, after an impromptu meeting with former president Bill Clinton sparked questions about her impartiality.

BREAKING: Foreign Firm Flagged By US Intelligence Got YOUR User Data For Horrifying Reason

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/PizK1C
Facebook user engagement has been in a freefall downward slide leaving the company scrambling to figure out new methods for boosting its user engagement since it came under fire for the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Zero Hedge reported on Facebook’s recent “dirty trick” for trying to boost its user engagement numbers – using phone numbers provided for two-factor authentication to send users data they can “engage with” but didn’t sign up for receiving via text message. They told “the story of Gabriel Lewis, who tweeted that Facebook texted “spam” to the phone number he submitted for the purposes of 2-factor authentication. And no, he insists he did not have mobile notifications turned on.
What’s more, when he replied “stop” and “DO NOT TEXT ME,” he says those messages showed up on his Facebook wall.”

Now in the latest bombshell revelation, we find that Facebook has also provided unrestricted access to user data to at least four Chinese electronics companies, including government-linked telecom giant Huawei.

These relationships were discovered and revealed as a part of a data sharing partnership program which included a minimum of 60 major device manufacturers, including but not limited to Apple, Amazon, Blackberry, Microsoft and Samsung. This data sharing partnership allowed these companies to integrate various Facebook features into their operating systems, thus giving them access to user data and that of the data of the users’ friends and family without their knowledge or consent.

Of particular concern is Huawei as lawmakers in Congress and top intelligence officials have previously raised red flags over whether or not the Chinese government might be able to demand access to data stored on Huawei devices or servers. Naturally, Huawei denies any such claims, yet the Pentagon chose to take definitive action and ban the sales of Huawei smartphones on U.S. military bases stemming from such concerns.
According to the Washington Post – Facebook data was only ever stored on Huawei servers, only directly on devices. WaPo notes – “A spokesman for Huawei did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Facebook late Tuesday confirmed that it had worked with Huawei, as well as three other Chinese firms, Lenovo, OPPO, and TCL. Facebook said those arrangements were “controlled from the get-go — and we approved the Facebook experiences these companies built.

Facebook’s statement followed a day of silence about its relationships with Chinese firms, which drew a sharp rebuke from Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va). Warner said in a statement Tuesday that Facebook’s relationships with Huawei and TCL raise ‘legitimate concerns, and I look forward to learning more about how Facebook ensured that information about their users was not sent to Chinese servers.’”

Amid the fallout from this most recent discovery, Facebook claims they plan to wind down their relationship with Huawei by the end of the week.

According to a New York Times report from Sunday evening, the data-sharing agreement allowed manufacturers to access information on relationship status, calendar events, political affiliations, and religion, among other things.

An Apple spokesman further revealed that the company relied on its private access to Facebook data to allow users to post on the social network without opening the Facebook app itself. This allowed manufacturers to access the data of users’ friends and family without their explicit consent. This is all in spite of Facebook insisting to all and sundry that they would not and had not allowed outside companies to access user data.

The NYT reports – “Facebook’s view that the device makers are not outsiders lets the partners go even further, The Times found: They can obtain data about a user’s Facebook friends, even those who have denied Facebook permission to share information with any third parties.

In interviews, several former Facebook software engineers and security experts said they were surprised at the ability to override sharing restrictions.”

FBI Director Demands Immunity NOW – Clintons On Brink Of Going Down After What’s Handed Over

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/ffcpGC
News broke overnight that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe is requesting legal immunity in exchange for his testimony on the agency’s handling of the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. This is huge news. That means that it’s just as corrupt as all of us suspected it was. Not only could it take the Clintons down, but whole bunch of people in the intelligence agencies and the Department of Justice. Good times.

McCabe’s lawyer wrote to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) yesterday seeking a guarantee of immunity for McCabe’s testimony before the panel. His attorney says that his client will plead the Fifth if prompted to testify otherwise. Now, that’s telling. Could it be this thing is finally going to get blown wide open and the nasty little corrupt sausage-making details exposed? I certainly hope so.

“Mr. McCabe is willing to testify, but because of the criminal referral, he must be afforded suitable legal protection,” Michael Bromwich, McCabe’s legal counsel, wrote to Grassley, according to CNN. Of course this is CNN we are referring to on this being leaked, so we will just have to see how it all plays out. “This is a textbook case for granting use immunity…If this Committee is unwilling or unable to obtain such an order, then Mr. McCabe will have to no choice but to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.” It’s either cut bait or fish here and at this point, I would give this guy immunity depending on what he has to offer up if it convicts the rest of these corruptocrats, especially Hillary Clinton.
Bromwich’s letter also makes clear that McCabe is willing to provide emails that “demonstrate that Mr. McCabe advised former Director Comey, in October 2016, that Mr. McCabe was working with FBI colleagues to correct inaccuracies before certain media stories were published.” Yeah, I bet he was. Grassley wrote to the FBI requesting that McCabe be released from a nondisclosure agreement that prevents him from providing the emails being requested, among other records.
If McCabe invokes his Fifth Amendment right instead of answering certain questions, it could set up a contentious confrontation with lawmakers. They could serve him with a subpoena and if he continues to refuse to testify, lawmakers could pursue a contempt resolution against him and refer the matter for prosecution by the DC US Attorney’s Office or enforce the subpoena through civil action in federal court.

McCabe has been under investigation via a criminal referral from the FBI’s inspector general. They have reportedly found that McCabe acted inappropriately by leaking information to a reporter and then lying about it to then-FBI Director James Comey. He’s also guilty of perjury. McCabe was fired last March, citing the internal review that found McCabe “lacked candor.” That’s FBI speak for ‘lying’. Of course, McCabe proceeded to insist he acted within his authority in authorizing FBI officials to talk to a reporter about an ongoing investigation surrounding the Clinton Foundation in 2016. Oh, but that wasn’t the case and he knows it. Now, the slippery bureaucrat is looking to make a deal and get immunity before he winds up behind bars for his misdeeds.

According to The Hill, Grassley has also invited Comey, as well as former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, to testify before the committee about the Clinton email investigation, sources told CNN. Both of them are in the crosshairs as well.
President Trump has shredded McCabe publicly for donations to his wife’s unsuccessful state Senate campaign in Virginia in 2015 from a group led by then-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D), a close Clinton family ally. It is a massive conflict of interest and McCabe should never have been made director of the FBI in the first place because of it.

Trump has called for an investigation into McCabe and rightly so. McCabe brought the investigation into Clinton’s misdeeds to a screeching halt, not because of her innocence, but because the FBI was covering for her to keep her out of jail and to help get her elected. In April, McCabe stated that he planned to retaliate by suing Trump for defamation and was considering other charges. None of which ever materialized. When that threat did not produce results, McCabe decided to save his own hide. Smart move. I certainly hope this moves forward and produces results.

Liberal Trans Professor Tries To Shut Down Conservative Speaker, Gets Rude Awakening

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/rp3AxD
After a liberal professor barbarically disrupted a conservative speaker in an attempt to shut down free speech, he learned a valuable lesson in constitutional freedoms.

The left unequivocally believes they have a monopoly on tolerance and morality. Ironically, their flagrant intolerance and penchant for underhanded tactics surface at the first hint of disagreement with their extremist values. This often prompts them to, at the least, shouting down opposing speakers, and, at the most, fascist violence.

When transgender liberal professor Joelle Ruby Ryan, a senior lecturer in the Women’s Studies department of the University of New Hampshire, heard that gay conservative comedian and political commentator Dave Rubin was invited to speak on May 1, he immediately resorted to the left’s choice strategy in fighting free thought. Ryan proceeded to disrupt Rubin’s event, leading protesters in attempting to drown out the speaker with noisemakers, obnoxious chants, and insolent screaming.
After relentlessly trying to shut down Rubin and bragging about the disruption on social media, Ryan’s career is deservedly in jeopardy. According to The College Fix, Ryan reportedly violated the university’s code on “harassing” and “hostile” behavior, placing him at the center of an academic review.

Part D of the code, section 3.5, states that “harassing…forms of communication,” as well as “any form of conduct that creates a hostile learning and/or working environment,” are forbidden.

Ryan has undeniably breached the code, which also stipulates that employees must allow for the “civil discourse” that Ryan delightedly confessed to suppressing. The rule states that educators “should exercise appropriate restraint, should show respect for the opinions of others, and should make every effort to indicate that they are not speaking for the institution.”
Further, subsection 3.5.2.1 forbids university members from engaging in conduct that creates “a hostile, intimidating, or offensive working and/or academic environment.” Section 3.5.2.4 similarly forbids “conduct [that] unreasonably interferes with an individual’s ability to participate in or benefit from an educational program or activity.”

Ryan bragged about his fascist behavior, posting the proof of his willingness to tyrannically shut down thought and speech with which he disagrees.

“We did something right! Glad we were able to disrupt this man’s hate speech as much as possible. He is nothing but a provocateur and ‘civil discourse’ with him is impossible,” Ryan admitted on Twitter.
However, once his behavior was reported to the university leadership, Ryan had nothing to say about his potential punishment.

Remarkably, the university seems to be taking the issue seriously and has expressed its dedication to the free exchange of ideas.

Via email, Erika Mantz, a spokeswoman for the university, told The College Fix: “The University is proud of these students for exercising their rights to speak freely. Unfortunately, there were disruptions before and during the event. The University will continue to work with students, staff and faculty to uphold both the letter of the law and the spirit of free inquiry.”

“The University cannot comment on its response to the behavior of any particular student or employee at the event, but notes that as a community we strive to cherish the right of all persons to speak to a robust variety of viewpoints and for members of this community to choose to hear those viewpoints,” Mantz added.

Only time will tell if the university truly values free speech and if it will appropriately reprimand Ryan for his infringement of it.

Universities have become a breeding ground for progressive indoctrination instead of higher education. Young people are learning to regurgitate their liberal professors’ ideological tenets, avoiding critical thinking and logic. As such, campuses across the U.S. are churning out vicious ideologues who are willing to sacrifice our exceptional freedoms for utopian ideals like diversity.
Hopefully, the university will terminate Joelle Ruby Ryan before he continues to propagate his far-left ideology while simultaneously infringing upon the rights of students and taxpayers.