[Watch in HD1080p – Those with impaired vision, please do not comment!] – Near a newly found Martian city, which will be closed in on in an upcoming episode, Freyk John Geeris found what might be a large Martian theme park. It looks like a laughing man from above, wearing a hat. In its left eye, clearly visible, you’ll discover a secondary facial feature, an eyeball, which in itself already makes it highly unlikely that this is a natural phenomenon. Together with the visible nose and mouth with lips and teeth, and the right eye visible just under the rim of the hat, on the left, it’s going to be hard for anyone, including any expert, to say this is all a trick of nature, unless they can come up with an example here on Earth that would prove the contrary. Then, if one examines the face a little closer, one can easily detect another two or three carved out faces on its surface embedded. Besides those, the Man In Hat is covered in structures of a variety of forms and sizes! Check it out for yourself, but please only comment if you have something sensible to say. Those with impaired vision, please do not comment at all. [Note: Although we would very much like to show you the unspoiled version, to prevent unauthorized copying and distribution for personal gain by Richard Hoagland and alike, this video has been tagged with a copyright notification throughout. Our sincere apologies.]
Tag: Life on mars
v
The name of Richard Hoagland – a bearded Viking warrior, still standing after all these years – is inevitably etched in the minds of all those who have contemplated the possibility that all may not be the way we are led to believe on the Moon and Mars. Informed and opinionated, and proud to have been a steady thorn in NASA’s side for over twenty years, Richard makes regular appearances as the Science Adviser on Coast to Coast AM – and has written two books, the most recent of which, Dark Mission, has climbed to near the top of the New York Times best seller list. We visited Richard at his Albuquerque home on two occasions. The first, in December 2006, generated the kind of spirited and wide-ranging restaurant conversation that really should have been captured on video. The second time, a year later, we channeled all our conversation on camera – three hours’ worth – and then celebrated with the restaurant conversation afterwards. The three of us were delighted with what we had captured. This interview, in three comprehensive parts, first chronicles Richard’s personal journey; then detailed photographic analysis evidencing NASA’s deception of the public for decades; and finally his personal views and conclusions about 2012. Richard – articulate, outspoken and controversial as always – packs a huge amount of information into the nearly three hours of edited interview. Whatever your personal views about NASA, the Apollo missions, or the possible real history of our solar …
Project Camelot interviews Richard Hoagland – Part 1 of 3.flv
The name of Richard Hoagland – a bearded Viking warrior, still standing after all these years – is inevitably etched in the minds of all those who have contemplated the possibility that all may not be the way we are led to believe on the Moon and Mars. Informed and opinionated, and proud to have been a steady thorn in NASA’s side for over twenty years, Richard makes regular appearances as the Science Adviser on Coast to Coast AM – and has written two books, the most recent of which, Dark Mission, has climbed to near the top of the New York Times best seller list. We visited Richard at his Albuquerque home on two occasions. The first, in December 2006, generated the kind of spirited and wide-ranging restaurant conversation that really should have been captured on video. The second time, a year later, we channeled all our conversation on camera – three hours’ worth – and then celebrated with the restaurant conversation afterwards. The three of us were delighted with what we had captured. This interview, in three comprehensive parts, first chronicles Richard’s personal journey; then detailed photographic analysis evidencing NASA’s deception of the public for decades; and finally his personal views and conclusions about 2012. Richard – articulate, outspoken and controversial as always – packs a huge amount of information into the nearly three hours of edited interview. Whatever your personal views about NASA, the Apollo missions, or the possible real history of our solar …