The Zapruder Film – a Disney Production?

20 thoughts on “The Zapruder Film – a Disney Production?”

1. so your prove of changed timing is that the bystanders do not look at the limosine.

   this would mean that zapruda filmed what was happening just a few seconds ahead of the car.

   Why should he do this? Oh, of cause, i forgot, he must be without any doubt part of the conspiracy 😉

   of cause this is how conspiracy logic works: every bit of inconsistency is undoubtable prove – everything that does not fit indicates that you found another member of the conspiracy…

2. at 5:20 they mention the “odd blurred extension on its lower left side” but if you look closely, that isn’t anything to support this theory… its a no parking sign or something. You can see the metal loops going around the base to hold it on. This sign is supported in other photographs taken from the other side of the road.

3. BUSTED!!! Don’t tell me we gonna have to whait around 50 years before knowing thoday’s lies.

4. was jfk ok maybe only a sore head

5. hahaha this is so ******** lame

6. Nothing…. He has no rights to this film… He is also a Jewish Zionist… Another random coincidence.

7. O my god you actually think they would fake this and he would not have enought time to do this considering he turned in the footage the day it happened

8. Conspiracy with the film? Seems far fetched and too difficult to pull off. The level of secrecy and control required would be too significant.

   Three major flaws. Road sign: looks perfectly natural, no signs of editing. Lamp post: the discrepancy you note is actually a sign affixed to the post–didn’t you see the metal bands security it? Lastly, the passenger movement: shots were fired and people ducked for cover, not lurch forward from braking! This video is a senseless distraction, IMHO.

9. Even if the timings of the footage were changed, it doesn’t change the fact that Kennedy’s brains were blown out and that there is no evidence to convict Oswald. Shut up and make a proper conspiracy.

10. 7:13 the ducking guy in the background look weird. Check out his legs! Pretty quick movement there.

    It seems to be clearer on this video (2:00)
    /watch?v=E66__vymfPA

11. ‘Wound of Entry, part 2′ and J’FK Dr Crenshaw Parkland Hospital’ and ‘Phone Interview Dr. Charles Crenshaw’.

    On the wound of entry video, see JFK(Tippit) with a SMALL entry hole in the throat, before the tracheotomy. Notice the block-out patch above the right eye hairline covering the head shot entry hole.
    The throat shot was through the windshield (supports this film).
    Doctors who saw the wounds said there were 2 front entry wounds.

    These films are never allowed on the History Channel.

12. who is the limo driver…?

13. Agree.

14. what does Zapruder have to say about all of this?

15. It’s amazing that theres this much proof, but somehow people deny it because they’re so ignorant…bleh

16. the ‘blur’ at the base of the lamp post is a traffic sign, with metal straps top and bottom of sign !!! (5:28)

17. Just thinking, it seems like Mr Zapruder was not in any shock in the way he was handling the camera and panning it so steadily, given that he would not have known about the assassination? Wouldn’t anyone in his shoe be surprised or shocked a lil bit at least? I believe there is a consipracy, but the Zapruder film seems more like a conspiracy within a conspiracy.

18. There are many other films of the JFK assassination. They do NOT support this *****. Yes, there was a conspiracy and there were other gunmen. This video, however, is nothing more than an attempt to make investigators look into areas which are nothing more than dead ends.

19. Hahaha… Oh dear…. I’ve gone blind.

    Can’t be a conspiracy… I can’t see.

20. Who said Zapruder edited the film?

    Who owns the original version?

    How many years before it was released to the public?

Comments are closed.