36Hrs Before Zuckerberg Faces Congress For Questioning His Huge Payoffs Surface – Rigged From Start

36Hrs Before Zuckerberg Faces Congress For Questioning His Huge Payoffs Surface – Rigged From Start

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/ooPvkf
Over the past several weeks, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been in the hot seat after it was discovered that nearly 87 million users had their privacy infringed upon, sold to international ad campaigns so they could use it to continue to divide an already fractured country. In light of this discovery, Zuckerberg is now being called to testify about it all in front of Congress this week. The well-known social media mogul will be forced to answer questions about his involvement in this scandal, while others want to confront him for his role in silencing conservatives on his platform.

However, according to a recent report, the lawmakers in charge of questioning Zuckerberg may be tainted as evidence of payoffs have surfaced, which has many wondering if justice will be served.

The purpose of Facebook was to connect people with others so that they could share information about their lives, but evidently, Zuckerberg wanted to share everything whether the user wanted to or not. Over the last few weeks, allegations have surfaced that paint the social media billionaire in an unsavory light as it was discovered that Zuckerberg sold information to foreign advertisers. The information gathered was then used to create more division in the country during the tumultuous 2016 presidential election.
Now that this has been uncovered the American people want answers to this disgusting invasion of privacy, but just 36 hours before Zuckerberg is to be questioned more bombshells have been discovered. According to USA Today, several lawmakers have been outed as receiving some of the “biggest recipients of campaign contributions from Facebook employees directly and the political action committee funded by employees.”

“Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection next week are also some of the biggest recipients of campaign contributions from Facebook employees directly and the political action committee funded by employees.The congressional panel that got the most Facebook contributions is the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which announced Wednesday morning it would question Zuckerberg on April 11.

Members of the committee, whose jurisdiction gives it regulatory power over Internet companies, received nearly $381,000 in contributions tied to Facebook since 2007, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The center is a non-partisan, non-profit group that compiles and analyzes disclosures made to the Federal Election Commission.

The second-highest total, $369,000, went to members of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which announced later that it would have a joint hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee to question Zuckerberg on Tuesday. Judiciary Committee members have received $235,000 in Facebook contributions.

On the House committee, Republicans got roughly twice as much as Democrats, counter to the broader trend in Facebook campaign gifts. Of the $7 million in contributions to all federal candidates tied to the Menlo Park, Calif.-based social network, Democrats got 65% to Republicans’ 33%.

Of the 55 members on the Energy and Commerce Committee this year, all but nine have received Facebook contributions in the past decade. The average Republican got $6,800, while the average Democrat got $6,750.”

Now, many people may want to know who else has been on the receiving end of these hefty donations, and thankfully a list has been compiled. According to Roll Call, these are all the members of Congress who listed Facebook holdings in their 2016 financial disclosures, along with the minimum worth of their stocks and of any capital gains or dividends.

Rep. Joyce Beatty — $15,001 / $5,001 dividends
Rep. Steve Chabot — $15,001
Rep. James R. Comer — $1,001
Rep. K. Michael Conaway — $0* / $2,501 capital gains
Rep. Carlos Curbelo — $1,001
Rep. Mike Gallagher — $0*
Rep. John Garamendi — $1,001
Rep. Josh Gottheimer — $16,002
Sen. John Hoeven — $50,001
Rep. Mike Kelly — $15,001
Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy III — $81,004
Rep. Ro Khanna — $2,002
Rep. Jim Langevin — $115,002 / $5,001 capital gains
Rep. Brenda Lawrence — $15,001
Rep. Alan Lowenthal — $15,001
Rep. Roger Marshall — $0* / $1 capital gains
Rep. Michael McCaul — $1,000,002 / $30,002 capital gains
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi — $500,001
Rep. James B. Renacci — $150,002 / $5,001 capital gains
Sen. Pat Roberts — $1,001 / $201 capital gains
Rep. Tom Rooney — $15,001
Rep. Francis Rooney — $1,001
Rep. Brad Schneider — $200,002
Rep. Kurt Schrader — $15,001
Rep. Lamar Smith — $1,001 / $1 capital gains
Rep. Tom Suozzi — $15,001
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse — $31,003
Rep. John Yarmuth — $1,001
Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx

Trump’s Lawyer Michael Cohen’s Office Raided is a HUGE DEAL! | Mike Cernovich

Trump’s Lawyer Michael Cohen’s Office Raided is a HUGE DEAL! | Mike Cernovich

If you’re happy with the raid of Michael Cohen’s office, be sure to thank Jeff Sessions for making this all possible!

You can fund high impact journalism directly via Patreon, PayPal, Litecoin, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Basic Attention Token or Ethereum.

Patreon – https://www.patreon.com/MikeCernovich
PayPal – https://www.paypal.me/cernovich
Bitcoin – 121qBTYn6ke4Xr6mUW3vXE93DcWXG3fotY
Bitcoin Cash – 1Jkud5sXj7ejcfh64ptw8RTWVtyHpjgkzj
Ethereum – 0x8bc7FFACdB13c7337f18D59D1067Fd61b9d5eF5c
Litecoin – Ld1AbD9c1Lp37SMQXpVftMfnezdBDQYb9s
Basic Attention Token – 0x8bc7FFACdB13c7337f18D59D1067Fd61b9d5eF5c

Follow me on my Steemit blog for News and Politics: https://steemit.com/@cernovich
And on my website for Lifestyle and Personal Development: https://www.cernovich.com/

Follow me and subscribe to my new Bitchute channel for all my video content:
https://www.bitchute.com/cernovich/

For unparalleled productivity and focus try Gorilla Mind: https://www.gorillamind.com/

Change the way you think, feel and live your life with Gorilla Mindset:
https://www.amazon.com/Gorilla-Mindset/dp/B0118LOSES/

Trump Hater Jimmy Kimmel Picks The Wrong Time To Start A Fight, Gets Bad News

Trump-Hater Jimmy Kimmel Picks The Wrong Time To Start A Fight, Gets Bad News

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/oGKyYV
Trump-hater Jimmy Kimmel picked the worst time to start a fight with his recent bashing of President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania, and Sean Hannity. Now, the late show degenerate has gotten some bad news that should have him looking for a new job.

After Kimmel mocked our First Lady for her accent and then made gay jokes about Fox News host Sean Hannity and President Trump, he’s finding out that there are times you probably should keep your mouth shut. Like other liberals, Kimmel loves drawing attention to himself. Normally, that would be a good thing in show business, but for Kimmel, it seems to be having the opposite effect.

Not only did Hannity take Kimmel to task over his recent mocking of Melania Trump’s accent, as seen in the clip below, but the late-night host got some more bad news, which is now spreading across the internet, likely in light of his recent feud.
According to TV By The Numbers, Kimmel’s current season ratings are at the bottom of the barrel with only a measly 2.31 million viewers tuning in. It would appear that for all his liberal jaw-flapping and Trump-hating, Kimmel continues to be a massive failure.

Statistically speaking, Kimmel is a flop. It’s hard to imagine why a network would keep a guy like Kimmel on the air after he continually turns out such low ratings. With roughly 330 million people in the U.S., less than one percent tune in to watch Kimmel’s unfunny shtick.
In a contest between Jimmy Fallon, Jimmy Kimmel, and Stephen Colbert, Kimmel comes in last. Fallon reportedly averages 2.97 million viewers while Colbert grabs 3.89 million. Colbert is nearly doubling the number of viewers Kimmel pulls in. So, why does Kimmel still have a job if he sucks and how do most Americans know who he is if less than one percent of the population watches his show?

The liberal owned and run media largely is to blame for Kimmel’s unmerited and otherwise unlikely rise to fame. Like the majority of other late show hosts, Kimmel spews mindless insults at Trump and conservatives while the corporate media props him up as a funny guy who is liked and loved by America. But, the numbers don’t lie.

The truth is that not many people want to tune in to hear the latest from guys like Kimmel. In my opinion, Kimmel wouldn’t even be a blip on the radar if Trump hadn’t become president. Aside from the late show host’s rants about what our President is doing, he lacks any real ability to draw a crowd. And, after his latest gay jokes about Hannity and Trump, Kimmel will have even lower ratings due to the outrage from the viewers in the LGBT crowd who may have watched him.
A huge reason that ABC may want to start looking for new talent to replace Kimmel is the list of shows that get better ratings. That list includes Fox News’ Hannity, Tucker Carlson Tonight, HGTV’s Fixer Upper Special, Family Feud reruns on various networks, and Jersey Shore: Family Vacation on MTV, according to Breitbart.

It’s really bad when reruns of old shows are leaving you in the dust, but Kimmel is an important piece of the liberal media’s propaganda war against conservatives. The sad fact is that the left runs the show when it comes to what gets on the air and what doesn’t. Because liberals aren’t likely to stop enjoying a good Trump-bashing anytime soon, Kimmel will likely survive a while longer.

The true talent in American late shows left the building a long time ago. Guys like Johnny Carson and Jay Leno had a great following for one reason — they were entertaining. They didn’t always agree with what was going on in the political world, but it rarely became a reason to abandon their audience as so many other modern-day late show hosts have.
While many millennials aren’t as familiar with Carson and Leno, there are tens of millions of baby boomers who would tune in to watch reruns of those guys over Kimmel. The latest round of attacks against our President and his wife and Hannity are just proof that Kimmel only has one thing going for him — liberalism.

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx

Liberal Director Joss Whedon Says ‘Trump Just Die,’ Realizes His Big Mistake Too Late

Liberal Director Joss Whedon Says ‘Trump Just Die,’ Realizes His Big Mistake Too Late

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/2ngFuw
Liberal director Joss Whedon wants President Donald Trump to die. After publicly wishing for the president’s death, Whedon was served a heaping pile of karma, but once he realized his big mistake, it was already too late.

Avengers director Joss Whedon is apparently one of the many Hollywood elites suffering from what has come to be known as “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” or TDS. The condition tends to manifest itself in symptoms such as ill-advised tweets and rants blaming President Donald Trump for things out of his control, all while failing to give him the credit he is due.

Trump Derangement Syndrome began claiming victims as soon as the president pulled off a historic victory against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who the media and the left assured us would win the White House in 2016. When she didn’t, those who had banked on her presidency lost their minds.

Joss Whedon is just the latest celebrity to come down with a bad case of TDS. Whedon, whose Twitter feed is characterized by hysterical, partisan, apocalyptic vitriol, begged the president to “just quietly die.”

“Donald Trump is killing this country,” Whedon tweeted, according to Twitchy. “Some of it quickly, some slowly, but he spoils and destroys everything he touches. He emboldens monsters, wielding guns, governmental power, or just smug doublespeak. Or Russia. My hate and sadness are exhausting. Die, Don. Just quietly die.”
Of course, Whedon offered no evidence whatsoever to support his claims that President Trump is “killing this country.” That’s probably because no evidence exists. In fact, the opposite is true — Trump is quickly fulfilling his campaign promise to make America great again. Illegal immigration is down, the stock market is up, fewer people are collecting welfare, and taxes have been slashed. The list goes on and on.

The director’s allegation that President Trump offers nothing more than “smug doublespeak” is also laughable, considering the president is hated among the left for telling it like it is, no matter how politically incorrect.
While Whedon’s liberal nonsense will certainly make you roll your eyes, his death wish for Trump was more than just annoying, and it earned him a suspension from the folks over at Twitter. Once his account was restored, he updated his followers, saying, “Well I was put in twitter suspension but luckily there was also a jock, a weird girl, a socialite and a rebel and it turns out we’re all the same or something (?) anyway they all hooked up and I had to write this tweet so I’m not sure, trump still killing the country tho lol.”

According to The Daily Wire, Whedon’s “Breakfast Club” reference didn’t seem to resonate with many folks online, but his declaration that Trump is somehow “killing the country” no doubt helped further endear him to his fellow Hollywood celebrities.

Ironically, Whedon’s remark that his “hate” is “exhausting” might be the most eye-opening part of this entire ordeal. Indeed, the left is undeniably the party of hate, despite what they would have you believe. They bill themselves as “tolerant” and “accepting,” but if you have the audacity to disagree with them, they will quite literally try to destroy you. Whedon was right, although he didn’t know it at the time. His hate IS exhausting.

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx