Day: April 11, 2018

Grammy Singer Releases Anti-Trump Video With Sick ‘Pink Pants’, Gets Nasty Surprise

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/YLXUJZ
If you thought the pink “p*ssy hats” were taking it too far, that’s nothing compared to Grammy-nominated singer Janelle Monae’s new video, which features “p*ssy pants.” The anti-Trump song “Pynk” is described by her promoters as a “brash celebration of creation, self-love, and sexuality,” while the truth is it’s so disgusting with its sick references to President Donald Trump that patriots just gave the singer a nasty surprise.

Singer Janelle Monáe debuted the music video for her latest feminism-heavy single “PYNK,” in which the Grammy-nominated star dons a pair of pants that resemble female genitalia.

In the politically charged music video, Monáe sings, “Pink like the inside of your…,” (yes, that) and, “Pink when you’re blushing inside, baby,” as she stands in a desert with a group of background dancers, wearing pants that resemble a woman’s vagina.

This is where the disgraceful Women’s March movement is leading girls and young women. The video should be rated X, as in pornography. One image in the music video shows actress Tessa Thompson in between Monáe’s legs as she stands in the desert alone, wearing the genitalia-inspired pants.
The majority of the lyrics are pornographic, so we will spare you, but what really shocked patriots was the references to President Donald Trump. Why is it that everything the immoral Hollywood crowd creates must include Trump-bashing? Chalk it up to Trump Derangement Syndrome.

The video features a woman wearing a pair of white underwear with the words “I grab back” captioned across the crotch, a reference to President Trump’s infamous Access Hollywood tape. You’d think these losers would go after those in their own industry, real monsters like Harvey Weinstein, but no, that isn’t the point of this debauched video. This is anti-Trump craziness at its worst.
The Hollywood Reporter wrote, “The rest of the video features similarly creative sexual innuendos, including pink sand poured onto an oyster, an ice cube on half of a grapefruit, a finger in a doughnut hole and a pink baseball bat dropped down from between a man’s legs.”

They add, “In a bedroom scene, Monáe wears some tighty whities with the bold pink words ‘sex cells’ — how meta in a video about sex! — while her lady bush peeks out from behind the underwear. Another close-up reveals a pair of white underwear reading, ‘I grab back.’ (Because what’s a 2018 music video without a Donald Trump reference?)”

Yeah, this isn’t edgy or provocative, it’s just gross. This isn’t empowering women, this is evil. No parent in their right mind would want their daughter to watch this garbage. That’s why patriots weighed in, making sure Janelle Monáe and her promoters know that not all Americans are fooled by her “woman power” video.

Jake Lee sarcastically tweeted, “Very ‘Classy’…It’s what every girl 16 and under should not only be singing but also be looking up to and idolizing….”
Bene Armavit tweeted, “More like exposes her easily led, cult behavior. Contributing to the decline of society by being ridiculous, graphic and promiscuous, that always works out well #lowestdenominator.”

“Do these morons not realize how idiotic they look? Holy sh*t… Yeah… This is how you get people to take your cause seriously… Parade around in p*ssy pants… In a ‘rap’ song. What dolts,” tweeted “_ill_be_damned_.”

Meanwhile, the super left media outlet Vox reports, “Judging by the music videos, Janelle Monáe’s new album Dirty Computer isn’t exactly going for subtle — and wow, we are blessed. After releasing dueling videos in late February for the Prince-esque jam ‘Make Me Feel’ and the take-no-sh*t rap ‘Django Jane,’ Monáe released a third video on Tuesday for ‘Pynk,’ which takes some of the subtext of those first two videos and releases it into the desert for a joyous coming-out party.”

How much you want to bet this porno video wins a Grammy in 2019? To say “we are blessed” by something so despicable proves that liberalism is a mental disorder. If anyone wants to know what patriots are fighting for, all you need to do is show them where our culture is at in America, and this sick perversion is a prime example.
This video is up on YouTube with no restrictions, trending at #2, and not censored in any way. But, conservative voices are censored every day on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter. Something just doesn’t add up; we are in a battle for the soul of this country, make no mistake about that.

BREAKING News Out Of IRAQ… Holy HELL!

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/32zeQR
Baghdad,IRAQ – Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi is taking extreme measures to protect the borders with Syria, saying that Islamic State will not be able to penetrate into Iraq ever again.

During his speech in his weekly conference, Abadi said, “security services achieved great progress to eliminate the remnants of Islamic State members,” Iraqi News reports.
“We took several measures to protect our borders with Syria from the remnants of ISIS,” Abadi said, adding that “Daesh (IS) will never penetrate into Iraq again.”

The Iraqi-Syrian borders are under the control of joint troops of military and border guards.

Islamic State continues to launch sporadic attacks across Iraq against troops. Security reports indicate that the militant group still poses threat against stability in the country.

Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi announced, in December, full liberation of Iraqi lands, declaring end of war against IS members.

Thousands of ISIS militants as well as Iraqi civilians were killed since the government campaign, backed by paramilitary troops and the coalition was launched in October 2016 to fight the militant group, which declared a self-styled “caliphate” from Mosul in June 2014.

As many as 3,298 civilians were killed and 4,781 others were wounded in 2017, excluding Anbar civilian casualty figures for November and December, which are not available, UNAMI said in a report in December.

The war against IS has so far displaced at least five million people.

God Bless.

Rep. Scalise Grills Zuckerberg on Anti-Conservative Algorithm Change, Favors to Obama Campaign

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/KRqtwB
House Majority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) questioned Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook’s recent algorithm changes, which preceded a spike in Facebook engagement to mainstream news outlets at the expense of conservative ones, as well as allegations by Barack Obama’s former media analytics director that Facebook granted special favors to their campaign in 2012.

“Getting into this new realm of content review, I know that some of the people who work for Facebook — Campbell Brown for example. ‘This is changing our relationship with publishers and emphasizing something that Facebook has never done before: it’s having a point of view.’”

Scalise also asked Zuckerberg if the people who, according to Zuckerberg, “mistakenly” censored Diamond and Silk on the platform were “held accountable” in any way.

Zuckerberg says the situation only unfolded as he prepared to testify, and he was not able to give details on the incident.

Rep. Scalise then cited a report that showed a “16-point disparity” in Facebook rankings between liberal and conservative publishing outlets following the social network’s recent change to its algorithm, intended to promote “quality news” in the words of Zuckerberg.

Rep. Scalise said the research indicated a “tremendous bias” against conservative news as a result of Facebook’s algorithm change.

Rep. Scalise, a former computer programmer, asked if Facebook had included a “bias” in its new algorithm. He also asked Zuckerberg who developed the algorithm.

Zuckerberg said that Facebook’s goal is to be a “platform for all ideas,” and that there was “absolutely no directive in any of the changes that we make to have a bias in anything that we do.”

Rep. Scalise urged Zuckerberg to “go back and look and determine if there was a bias,” and let Congress know. Scalise said it was “disturbing” to see the kind of disparity that emerged in the wake of Facebook’s algorithm change.

Obama favors

Rep. Scalise then asked Zuckerberg about comments made by Barack Obama’s former media analytics director, Carol Davidsen, who said that Facebook had given the campaign special favors in 2012. This was the first time in two days of hearings that Zuckerberg had been asked about the issue.

During the Cambridge Analytica scandal, Davidsen said that the campaign was able to “suck out the entire social graph” of the U.S. and that Facebook representatives were “very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”

If true, this could constitute an illegal corporate contribution under federal campaign law, according to a former Federal Election Commission member.

“We didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn’t otherwise have been able to do,” said Zuckerberg, confirming that he thought Davidsen’s comments were “inaccurate.”

He did not explain why he thought Davidsen — who oversaw Obama’s data operation in 2012 — could have got it wrong.

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx

Devin Nunes Warns FBI & DOJ To Come Clean, Unleashes Their Worst Nightmare

SOURCE : https://goo.gl/xiSHMq
President Donald Trump’s wingman in Congress, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), just warned the corrupt FBI and Department of Justice that they better come clean and turn over unredacted documents or face serious consequences. You don’t want to miss what he said as he unleashed their worst nightmare.

Millions of American patriots have watched in frustration as deep state hacks in the FBI and Department of Justice continue to skirt congressional authority and act as if they are a complete and separate branch of our government.

Now, in the fight with the deep state to secure unredacted documents, Nunes told FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that their days are numbered. Nunes’ warning came during an interview on Fox News‘ The Ingraham Angle with host Laura Ingraham on Tuesday, April 10, 2018.

“Our next guest is spearheading the effort to find out why the Department of Justice opened the Russian collusion probe in the first place. Surprise, surprise, the DOJ won’t give us straight answers. Joining me now exclusively, House Intel Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, a Republican from California,” Ingraham said as she started the segment.

“You’ve been trying to get documents for as long as I have been doing this show. People have been asking why is it that you haven’t yet held anyone in contempt of Congress. It’s a big deal to do that. Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress as I recall over the Fast and Furious documents. What gives here?” Ingraham asked.

“We’ve been in a situation where it’s trickle down documents. So, we issued the subpoena in August. We walked through piece by piece, every time we get a little bit more. As you know, we had to get out the major information, which was the information on the warrant against Carter Page, who was a Trump associate. So, since that time we’ve been investigating the State Department and we especially have an interest in this electronic communication,” Rep. Devin Nunes replied.

“EC, which is the document that establishes the justification, correct? For ultimately naming the special counsel,” Laura Ingraham said. Nunes corrected Ingraham and said that the EC document, which consists of two pages, was responsible for opening the DOJ’s counterintelligence investigation, which then led to the naming of Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Today, Mueller continues to conduct his witch hunt and waste millions of taxpayer dollars.

“I sent Chairman Gowdy (R-SC) over there to see it originally. It was fully redacted, so they couldn’t read anything. I called back several times, had conversations with Rod Rosenstein and with Director Wray, FBI Director. Mr. Gowdy and the investigators went over there again and there were only a few more things that were unredacted,” Nunes told Ingraham.

“So, now we’re at this point again. We’re at a boiling point where we need this. What is only a two-page document, it’s only a two-page, it’s less than two-pages from what I understand. And, you know, if the record wasn’t that every time they hide something from us, then we find out it was really bad and they hid it from us for a long time,” Nunes added.
When Laura Ingraham asked Rep. Devin Nunes about speculation that he was moving to hold FBI Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in contempt of Congress, Nunes said, “We are going to get the document. We are going to get the two pages. So, they can either cough them up now or it will get really complicated starting tomorrow night, and we’ll have to take all the necessary steps to get the documents.”

Ingraham asked Nunes to clarify his threat. “What are the chance you are going to hold Wray and Rosenstein in contempt of Congress?” she asked, to which Nunes then said, “We’re not only going to hold in contempt, but we will have a plan to hold in contempt and impeach,” according to Politico.

I could not agree more with Devin Nunes. It’s time for Rod Rosenstein and Christopher Wray to provide the unredacted documents, which were eventually used to justify a special counsel. In my opinion, both men should be held in contempt and impeached for behaving as if they aren’t accountable to our elected leaders. Americans are tired of unelected deep state hacks like Wray and Rosenstein hiding the truth. It’s time for heads to roll.

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx