Month: April 2018

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
“No One Expected This” Here’s Why The YouTube Shooting Disappeared From Headlines
SOURCE : https://goo.gl/rDCq2m

Has everyone noticed how this week’s YouTube shooting has magically disappeared from the headlines? While the Parkland School Shooting is still front page news two months later? Here are the reasons.

The shooter wasn’t a white male. In fact, it was a woman who was a “peaceful vegan,” who even fought for animal rights and supported PETA. This goes totally against everything the left stream media has told us about mass shootings. She wasn’t a man in his early 20’s who embraced the American gun culture.

The shooter used a 9mm handgun, not a big bad mean looking black AR-15 which the media can lie about. And a 9mm handgun is something that’s practically impossible to ban because it’s not part of the “Assault Rifle” narrative, although it can do just about as much damage as an “Armalite Rifle.”

The shooting happened in the looney state of California where they have the strictest gun control of all 50 states unless you are an illegal alien shooting at sea lions. In fact, starting next year every gun owner in California will have to pay the state $50 a year to get a special license to purchase ammo, even .22lr. And that ammo will be serialized and tracked to the person buying it. So the state will know how much ammo you buy.

Authorities, just like in the Parkland shooting were warned but they failed to protect the citizens. Yes, the father of this shooter notified police that his daughter was going to do something like this to YouTube. Police found her and let her go because they deemed her to not be a threat. And the left keeps telling us we don’t need guns because the police are there to protect us.

The shooter developed a hatred towards YouTube, which is owned by Google because they were censoring her videos. This is something the liberal media chooses to ignore considering it doesn’t affect them, but it does affect almost every publisher on the right. And that includes gun content, even if it’s just instructional on how to safely load and reload a firearm, even a shotgun which former Vice President Joe Biden said was enough for all your security needs.

Here is more on social media censorship via Paste Magazine:

“Take Twitter, for example. The online social networking service is often criticized for not protecting its users and allowing pretty much anything on its platform. Because it does allow anything on its platform and that’s part of why people love it so much.

Twitter is also kind of like a filing cabinet that records and preserves our digital history for us. You can go to Twitter, search a hashtag and find photos, articles and all the opinions you could ever want to hear on a particular moment from (recent) history. That’s pretty cool, when you think about it. But what’s not cool is finding tweets that you never saw, tweets that seemingly disappeared even though the 140-characters were typed.

Twitter has been caught removing tweets, hiding tweets and deleting trending hashtags. Such accusations have opened the doors to how such a prominent platform—which sources the news for over half the population-gets away with censorship before our very eyes.
It was just a few months ago that Twitter was accused of censoring tweets under ‘#DNCLeak’ during the WikiLeaks e-mail debacle. In this particular scenario, conservative Twitter users accused the platform of removing the hashtag from the trending bar, despite it displaying an estimated 250,000 tweets about the leaked employee e-mails from the Democratic National Committee.

On the other side of the political spectrum, of course, is the whole Milo Yiannopoulos situation, which involves permanent censorship in the form of banning. Another accusation comes from Trump supporters, which say the social platform concealed his tweets asking for campaign donations.

But is this censorship? Or is it just the work of a flawed algorithm?

Twitter, like other social platforms, works off an automated algorithm that determines what appears in your news feed and when. The information that shows up is based on an analysis of whom you interact with and what kind of tweets the algorithm thinks you’ll be more interested in seeing.

In some cases, you might not see a person’s tweets in your timeline because of the algorithm. Then, when you go to that person’s Twitter profile, there will be a slew of tweets you never saw. It could be as innocent as an algorithm only pushing certain tweets to the front of your feed-but that very fact shows the kind of power Twitter has.
credibl

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
Since 2015, More Than 1 Million Undocumented Immigrants Received Driver’s Licenses in California
SOURCE : https://goo.gl/sNfQjT

On Wednesday, the California Department of Motor Vehicles said that more than 1 million undocumented immigrants have received driver’s licenses.

The Safe and Responsible Drivers Act, also known as AB 60, passed in 2015 and allowed undocumented immigrants to receive a license, leading to an initial spike of 605,000 recipients, The Sacramento Bee reported.

The law allowed immigrants to obtain licenses if they verified their identity and proved they held residence in California, where the DMV now issues about 10,000 of those licenses per month.

But in the initial year of the law’s passage, California reportedly issued 452,000 licenses without proof of residency.

Former Assemblyman Luis Alejo, who authored the bill in 2013, said in a statement that the law “has dramatically improved the lives of a million immigrants and their families.”

“Immigrants are getting tested, licensed and insured, and this is making our roads safer for everyone,” he said.
The bill was intended to enhance public safety, something a Stanford University study supported. Stanford researchers found that the policy helped reduce the probability that hit-and-run accidents would occur and even prevented California drivers from spending $3.5 million in property damage costs.

Critics have argued, however, that the law legitimizes illegal immigration. The Heritage Foundation’s Hans von Spakovsky said the law “makes it easier for them to use this government-issued ID for many illegal purposes, such as applying for government benefits or registering to vote.”

Wednesday’s news added to the buzz surrounding California’s relatively lax immigration enforcement. Earlier this week, the Huntington Beach City Council voted to sue the state over its sanctuary policy limiting local law enforcement’s cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

The Justice Department also announced a lawsuit last month against the entire state of California, citing three separate state laws that it said “obstruct enforcement of federal immigration law and harm public safety.”

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
HELL YEAH! Trump Just Hurled His Prepared Speech Into Crowd, ‘To Hell With It’ [WATCH!]
SOURCE : https://goo.gl/pwv8BM

What makes people love President Trump is sometimes the exact same thing that makes people hate him… his straightforward attitude. He is crass and tells it like it is. Even if you do not agree with him. One thing you can never take away from him is he always shares his opinions on issues.

At a recent event, he showed himself as exactly this kind of person and his constituents at the rally loved it!

The Daily Wire reported,

“On Thursday, President Donald Trump participated in a roundtable discussion on tax reform in West Virginia where he decided to throw out his prepared remarks — literally.

Trump, flanked by Republicans Rep. Evan Jenkins and Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, started off by saying, “This would have been my remarks. It would have taken about two minutes … but to hell with it.” At that moment Trump threw his prepared remarks into the crowd which cheered in amusement.

Trump continued by saying that while he was reading over the first paragraph that the remarks were boring and he wanted to “tell it like it is.””
At the event the President discussed a plethora of different topics such as immigration, voter fraud, as well as tax reform. The President argued that there is widespread voter fraud in the United States and that many people voted multiple times in California saying,

“In many places, like California, the same person votes many times. You probably heard about that. They always like to say ‘oh that’s a conspiracy theory.’ Not a conspiracy theory, folks. Millions and millions of people. And it’s very hard because the state guards their records. They don’t want to see it.”

His argument was that Democrat politicians in power do nothing to remedy this issue because these individuals vote Democrat and the politicians want to stay in power.

When discussing immigration the president referred to the southern border between Mexico and the United States. He alleged that female migrants who have attempted to cross the border are being raped at levels that nobody has ever seen before. However, he provided no evidence of this allegation arguing,

“Remember my opening remarks in Trump Tower when I opened, everybody said, ‘Oh he was so tough.’ I used the word ‘rape,’ And yesterday it came out where, this journey coming up, women are raped at levels that nobody’s ever seen before. They don’t want to mention that. So we have to change our laws.”

Then turning his attention to the blue dog Republican Senator, Senator Joe Manchin, he said,

“So you’re going to have a chance to get a senator that’s going to vote our program. That’s going to help you in so many different ways. And you’re not getting that now.”

CNBC reported,

“California’s top elections official, Secretary of State Alex Padilla, said: “It is sad the president continues to recycle the same old lies. Frankly, it is tiring to have a conspiracy theorist in the White House.”

Trump has been emboldened in recent weeks amid the departure of multiple top aides and a renewed push to appeal to his voting base. Recently, the president has announced tariffs on China and directed National Guard troops to go to the U.S. border with Mexico, two actions to follow through on campaign pledges.

Trump has also repeatedly attacked Amazon, one of his favorite punching bags, for what he calls preferential treatment relative to other retailers.

The president was followed Thursday by West Virginia lawmakers and business leaders who talked about how families benefited from the GOP tax plan passed in December. Republican leaders have attempted to sell the tax legislation, the party’s signature achievement of 2017, ahead of November’s crucial midterm elections. Trump and some key Republican lawmakers have been pushing for a “phase two” of tax reform, which would include making individual tax cuts permanent, among other provisions.

More inflammatory issues such as immigration have apparently resonated more with GOP voters. Trump touched on the tax legislation briefly at the start of his remarks before moving to other topics. He criticized West Virginia’s vulnerable Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin for opposing the tax plan. The president was flanked by Rep. Evan Jenkins, R-W.Va., and West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, also a Republican, who are both trying to unseat Manchin in November.”
When it comes to President Trump nobody is off limits and he will hold them all accountable. Whether they are blue dog Democrats or conservative Republicans. The people love him for the way he speaks and it is a message that has resonated with middle-class America out West and in the Midwest. Until Democrats are able to understand the struggles of these Americans they will continue to lose their votes. While Republicans continue to hold onto the majority and win elections.

Share if you agree.

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
ACLU Just Issued CHILLING Statement Against Military Border Security
SOURCE : https://goo.gl/EszvuD

The left-leaning ACLU has come out swinging against our American military and homeland security.

Liberal leadership at the ACLU has stated that our military does NOT belong on the border protecting American citizens.
ACLU President Astrid Dominguez said in a statement that deploying U.S. military is a dangerous move and is contrary to the fundamentals of a “NORMAL and CIVIL society.”

The leftwing American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) responded to news that President Donald Trump is sending National Guard Troops to the Southern Border, claiming the military does not “belong” on the country’s frontiers.

“Military troops don’t belong at the border,” director of the ACLU Border Rights Center director Astrid Dominguez said in a statement Wednesday. “Deploying the military in U.S. communities is a dangerous move, contrary to the fundamental norms of a civil society.”

The ACLU statement did not mention that the administration of President Barack Obama sent the National Guard to the border in 2014 and again in 2015. Nor does it mention that President George W. Bush sent 6,000 significantly more Guardsmen than the roughly 3,000 Trump announced.

The ACLU’s sentiment was echoed by liberal politicians like Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), who called having troops at the border “Orwellian,” and Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, who claimed she would refuse to send her state’s Guardsmen to the border if Trump asked. Trump issued a proclamation asking governors to order their National Guard troops to participate, rather than a federalization order, meaning governors are within their rights not to do so.

CNN took a different tack Friday, claiming not that having U.S. troops at the border would be an “Orwellian” move “contrary to the fundamental norms of a civil society,” but that the troops “may not have much to do.” The same report described the now dispersed “caravan” of more than 1,000 Central American migrants intent on entering the United States without permission, “an annual event to draw attention to the plight of migrants.”

Undeterred, the president moved forward Thursday with plans to deploy 2,000-4,000 National Guardsmen alongside the Border Patrol. It is a move that attracted support from immigration hawks inside and outside the administration.

“The country can’t wait for Congress to pass new laws,” Center for Immigration Studies’ Jessica Vaughan wrote in a Thursday Fox News op-ed:
Dan Stein, president of the non-profit Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) expressed his support in a Wednesday statement. “The deployment of the National Guard and other military resources to the southern border, announced by the Trump Administration, is a necessary, tactical move that will help stanch illegal immigration and secure the border against the threats of terrorism and drug smuggling,” he said. “Illegal alien apprehensions are eclipsing 1,000 persons per day, and this is likely to increase given ongoing talks about amnesty, catch-and-release policies, and rampant abuse of our asylum laws”

Dan Stein, president of the non-profit Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) expressed his support in a Wednesday statement. “The deployment of the National Guard and other military resources to the southern border, announced by the Trump Administration, is a necessary, tactical move that will help stanch illegal immigration and secure the border against the threats of terrorism and drug smuggling,” he said. “Illegal alien apprehensions are eclipsing 1,000 persons per day, and this is likely to increase given ongoing talks about amnesty, catch-and-release policies, and rampant abuse of our asylum laws”

“It will be strong. It will be as many [troops] as are needed to fill the gaps today,” Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen promised Wednesday.

“The President was clear that this caravan needed to be stopped before it arrived at our southern border, and his efforts now appear to be successful,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement about the troops being sent to the border. “But let me be clear as well: we will not accept the lawlessness of these types of efforts and those who choose to violate our laws, and those who conspire to assist others to violate our laws, will face criminal prosecution.”

Please Subscribe: https://goo.gl/J8aMKx
BREAKING! Badass Congressman Just Pulled Out A Loaded Gun And Yelled He REFUSED ‘To Be A Gabby Giffords’
SOURCE : https://goo.gl/EkDSsb

As the battle to disarm America rages on between those of us that choose to personally defend ourselves by carrying a personal firearm and those that would choose to disarm Americans rages on, one South Carolina congressman stepped up to the plate to make his point in bold fashion.

U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman (S.C.-R) chose to pull out his own loaded .38-caliber handgun and sat it on a table for several minutes during a scheduled “coffee with constituents” meeting about gun violence prevention with his constituents at a Rock Hill restaurant. Norman was attempting to make a very valid point that inanimate objects do not commit crimes to those of his constituency that were calling for gun control. Yet many are accusing Norman of everything from brandishing a weapon to committing a felony.

While making the point that guns are only dangerous in the hands of criminals with his personal firearm sitting on the table in front of him, Norman then made the statement – “I’m not going to be a Gabby Giffords.” Norman was referring to the former Arizona congresswoman who was shot outside a grocery store during a constituent gathering in 2011 in Tucson, Arizona. Norman went on to state – “I don’t mind dying, but whoever shoots me better shoot well or I’m shooting back.”
Since the statement, the husband of former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords chose to respond to Norman’s comments, stating Norman is “no Gabby Giffords” and noting his wife’s dedication to ending the gun violence. Rather than focusing on education and training, Giffords and Kelly have chosen to advocate for gun control laws aimed at reducing gun violence. Kelly also called Norman an extremist who relies on intimidation tactics and perpetuates fear.

Kelly said in a statement – “Americans are increasingly faced with a stark choice: leaders like Gabby, who work hard together to find solutions to problems, or extremists like the NRA and Congressman Norman, who rely on intimidation tactics and perpetuating fear.”

Giffords and Kelly have campaigned and continue to actively campaign for full firearm confiscation believing that universal background checks are not enough. Meanwhile, Norman is a noted Conservative with the voting record to prove it.

Norman states he intends to display his personal firearm at future constituent meetings in an effort to make his point that people kill people, guns are simply tools. Norman states – “I’m tired of these liberals jumping on the guns themselves as if they are the cause of the problem.”

Naturally, some were quick to condemn Norman’s actions. School teacher Lori Carter of Charlotte, North Carolina stated she thought Norman’s move was contradictory in that Norman has no idea if someone at the meeting might have had mental health issues or concerns. Carter stated – “What was to prevent me from leaning across the table to take that gun?” Another woman said Norman’s actions upset her greatly as she felt “unsafe” by her representative’s actions.

The Charleston City Paper reports –

“Lori Freeman, a volunteer group leader with Moms Demand Action in Fort Mill, said she found out about the meeting on the congressman’s Facebook page and decided to go after he rebuffed a previous meeting request on the heels of the February shooting of 17 people at a high school in Parkland, Fla.
Freeman thinks Norman might have been encouraged to take out his weapon by another constituent who was at the table Friday morning.

‘This gentleman offered up that he was concealed carrying, and he asked if we felt safer because he was concealed carry,’ Freeman said in a phone interview with CP. ‘Once the gentleman said he was concealed carry, that’s when [Rep. Norman] reached into his blazer. He pulled his gun out, told us it was loaded, put it on the table, and let it sit there for five to 10 minutes.’

‘Honestly, it was just a strange feeling,’ Freeman said about Friday’s meeting. ‘I don’t know that I felt scared. I was trying to figure out if he was using it as an intimidation factor or to have some kind of bravado. I kind of felt angry more than I felt scared, I felt very angry that he was doing that to us. I felt that he didn’t know our history, if any of us were survivors of gun or domestic violence, if anyone may have also had a criminal history.’

Freeman maintains that both of her encounters with Rep. Norman have been mostly pleasant and that he even expressed support for a ‘red flag law,’ which would allow family members or law enforcement to temporarily restrict gun purchases to anyone deemed to pose a danger to themselves or others.”